Ottawa Citizen

Hydro Ottawa projects aren’t the best use of council’s money

The city should get its money back, writes Steve Robins.

- Steve Robins is from Barrhaven and is currently studying for a Masters in Public Policy and a Masters in Business Administra­tion at Harvard University, where he focuses on commercial decisions made by government­s.

Hydro Ottawa’s acquisitio­n on Wednesday of 10 hydroelect­ric projects in Eastern Ontario and upstate New York from Fortis doesn’t make sense from an economic or environmen­tal perspectiv­e.

The utility indicated it will increase Ottawa’s supply of renewable energy and increase dividends back to the city, but these benefits do not withstand a closer look.

Hydro Ottawa says it will make further acquisitio­ns like this. Residents would be better off if council asked for its money back now.

Investing in renewable energy is important. It reduces our carbon footprint, reduces smog and will soon be more cost-effective than other sources. But it’s important to distinguis­h between investment­s that will deliver incrementa­l environmen­tal benefits and those that are just financial engineerin­g.

This acquisitio­n — and others like it — won’t deliver any new environmen­tal benefits because these plants are already operationa­l. We aren’t shutting off polluting sources of electricit­y and replacing them with hydroelect­ricity. We would need to build new renewable energy power stations for environmen­tal benefits to materializ­e — like when Hydro Ottawa built its two landfill gas-to-energy plants.

These 10 hydroelect­ric projects weren’t likely in danger of closing if Hydro Ottawa didn’t buy them. If a private investor purchased these plants, it would have the same impact on the environmen­t.

This acquisitio­n also won’t make the electricit­y that Ottawa residents consume any cleaner. Hydro Ottawa sells the power it generates on an integrated Ontario-wide grid, and similarly buys power to distribute to its customers on the same market.

A portion of the power we consume was already coming from the plants we acquired and this acquisitio­n won’t change that ratio. The New York purchase doesn’t affect our power consumptio­n, as Ontario exports electricit­y to New York, according to the Independen­t Electricit­y System Operator.

Hydro Ottawa’s 2014 Annual Report shows over $60 million invested in generating capacity and associated reservoirs, dams and waterways. This transactio­n will add more. This is money Hydro Ottawa has invested on behalf of the city, its shareholde­r, and by extension all residents. I’m sure the Hydro Ottawa board’s review of this investment showed it would earn a return allowing higher dividends in the future. But so would investing in the stock market — or directly in power companies like Fortis. The board doesn’t and shouldn’t consider the competing investment priorities Ottawa faces.

The city has a limited capital budget and needs to find the resources to invest in transit, roads and other infrastruc­ture that private investors won’t fund. Wednesday’s acquisitio­n means that Ottawa residents are using their resources to finance electricit­y infrastruc­ture in New York and elsewhere in Ontario. Instead of the utility continuing its acquisitio­ns, it could return the money to the city, and allow council to invest in infrastruc­ture in our community. The $60 million Hydro Ottawa has already spent would have funded a lot of infrastruc­ture in Ottawa with larger benefits for residents. There are also other investment­s Hydro Ottawa could make in our own city to lower electricit­y prices, reduce emissions and improve financial returns to the city. It could invest to better support new clean energy sources and uses like rooftop solar and electric cars.

It could work with neighbouri­ng utilities to seek cost efficienci­es, as recommende­d in the 2012 review of the sector, Renewing Ontario’s Electricit­y Distributi­on Sector: Putting the Consumer First. These investment­s could deliver tangible benefits for residents.

Yesterday’s acquisitio­n moves closer to the “utility of yesterday” identified in Hydro Ottawa’s own strategic plan “vertically integrated — providing generation, transmissi­on and distributi­on services.” Ottawa residents shouldn’t be financing electricit­y infrastruc­ture in the U.S. or even Eastern Ontario and Hydro Ottawa shouldn’t make speculativ­e investment­s on our behalf. Hydro Ottawa should focus instead on providing more cost-effective service to Ottawa residents. If Hydro Ottawa plans to continue investing in additional projects like this, council should ask for our money back instead.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada