Ottawa Citizen

Readers respond

- ELLIE TESHER Advice

Feedback: Regarding the female pharmacist concerned about a male physician’s persistent touching and suggestive comments (July 28): Reader #1: “I’m a male surgeon. That’s a horrid situation of harassment. The pharmacist should immediatel­y report this.

“While there’s sometimes a culture of ‘specialize­d’ comments in hospitals, it’s often mutual and built up after years of trust in a close-knit team.

“The medical staff are responsibl­e to the chief of staff for conduct.

“This is because hospital Human Resources (HR) usually cannot fire or discipline physicians.

“Any member of the public can complain to the College of Physicians about behaviour.” Reader #2: “This is a typical onesided story from a “completely innocent” person being abused by her/his superior.

“While I don’t support the doctor’s behaviour, I think this just didn’t happen overnight.

“The doctor did step over the line. But the woman didn’t include other details – e.g. if she had any personal gains while allowing the doctor to progress with his inappropri­ate behaviour.

“Did the doctor help her to get a promotion, a better-paid job? Does she now have more fun and/or more freedom, and less workload? Does he cover for her when she’s not working but was supposed to work?

“Does he take her out for lunches, buy her presents, take her on business trips?

“Did she like his attention, or flirting with the doctor?

“Why didn’t she say anything initially? She could’ve politely declined his advances and been clear that she’s not interested. She didn’t do that.

“I work for a huge organizati­on. Annually, we’re required to complete a module about ‘Respect at the Workplace.’

“It states that there’s nothing wrong with asking someone to go out (ONCE only), regardless of their marital status.

“I think she played a big role in letting him cross the line and she has to take responsibi­lity for that.

“However, if she tells him that she doesn’t want to continue with this relationsh­ip, there’s a chance that she’ll lose some or all of the perks.

“So it seems best (Ellie: presumably the writer is being sarcastic here) for Ms. Touched Too Much to be selfish, report him, and let him lose his job.

“Instead, she should’ve been ‘Touched once and never again’ or ‘Never touched in the First Place.’ Ellie: As has happened too often with workplace harassment complaints from either men or women, the pharmacist who tried (albeit misguidedl­y) not to cause trouble, is presumed to have enjoyed the harassment, and/or stayed with it for personal gain.

While we can’t interrogat­e her (as Reader #2 would prefer), she wrote that she’s 34, happily married, and would never cheat.

She said she didn’t want to make a scene despite discomfort when the doctor pushed his body against her, and so tried to ignore him.

She asked me if he was “harmlessly flirting” as she had “no experience with dating and flirting in the adult workplace.”

She said she’s “never shown signs” of being interested.

She was clearly worried that the doctor would take this behaviour further.

I stand by my response to her: “If he tries anything further, say calmly and firmly, ‘This is inappropri­ate,’ and get your report to hospital officials immediatel­y.” Read Ellie Monday to Saturday. Email ellie@thestar.ca. Ellie chats at noon Wednesdays, at thestar.com/elliechat. Follow@ellieadvic­e.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada