Ottawa Citizen

Technology policy is also cultural policy

Technologi­cal companies should be held to a higher standard

- MADELINE ASHBY Madeline Ashby is a strategic foresight consultant and novelist living in Toronto. You can find her at or on Twitter @MadelineAs­hby.

Less than a week from now, the voting population of Canada will make a definitive comment on the past 11 weeks of campaignin­g. For the past few weeks, this column has focused on issues of technology policy that were ignored on the campaign trail. This week, it focuses on the truth germane to those issues: technology policy is cultural policy.

Traditiona­lly, the divide between the arts and sciences has been useful for students and profession­als deciding on career paths, provided they are privileged enough to make that choice. But dividing intellectu­al and academic pursuits in that way has resulted in a false dichotomy that creates more problems than it actually solves. In separating the humanities from the sciences, we have separated the people who use technology from the people who develop it, and replaced qualitativ­e evaluation with an endless parade of push-button metrics. This is the emoji-fication of sentiment writ large: users whose primary recourse for participat­ing in the developmen­t of life-changing technologi­es never reaches beyond deciding how many stars it receives in an app store.

Take Peeple, the “Yelp for people” app that wants to let humans “rate” each other as though they were objects. Membership is not required for a rating; anyone with your phone number can rate you. Negative comments are given a 48-hour waiting period, because founders Julia Cordray and Nicole McCullough seem to think people enjoy prolonged conversati­ons with stalkers, harassers and bullies. When the Internet cried out in terror, Cordray and McCullough wrote a passiveagg­ressive non-apology about how tragically misunderst­ood their special snowflake app was. The app’s public relations were such stunning failures of both empathy and technologi­cal foresight that Internet debunker Snopes even poked Peeple to see if it was real.

Meanwhile, in China, tech giants Alibaba and Tencent have developed very similar apps. Because China lacks a centralize­d credit scoring system, the creditors themselves have developed multiple systems using data stripped from social media networks, credit card purchases, and the content of online conversati­on (including, naturally, online conversati­on about politics). And at the same time, the Chinese government is working on their own solution to the credit score problem, and according to documents released last year, it intends to design a credit score that rates and rewards, among other things, “sincerity.” Perhaps Peeple was simply founded in the wrong country, for the wrong government.

From the Sony hack to the Ashley Madison hack, from Edward Snowden to Jennifer Lawrence, this year has seen unpreceden­ted breaches of privacy and security. And those breaches are possible because the companies who were breached treated their data like ones and zeros, not human lives. Unless you’re a fembot coded into existence by Ashley Madison or some other Internet long con, the person on the other side of a profile is just that: a person. But we live in an era and use technologi­es that encourage and thrive on objectific­ation. And the more our data is commodifie­d, the more our identities are transforme­d from the complex to the simple, from the distinctiv­e to the statistica­l. The cost of lost privacy is not simply financial, it is human. The ongoing harassment of women online should make that clear. And whatever government takes on the leadership of Canada in the New Year should understand that.

Technology isn’t an issue that Canadians should consider only when thinking about how people with access to the Conservati­ve database suppressed votes with robocalls in 2011. Or whether the former head of CSEC, Canada’s version of the NSA, thinks Canadians are stupid.

Or how much informatio­n Canadian companies share with the NSA itself. Humans are tool-users. Our technologi­es think for us, speak for us, and act for us.

We are more than machines, and hold ourselves to a higher standard. It’s time we started holding our technologi­es, and the industries surroundin­g them, to that higher standard as well.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada