Ottawa Citizen

THE MAN TASKED WITH CLEANING UP THE SENATE’S IMAGE

- JOHN IVISON jivison@nationalpo­st.com Twitter.com/IvisonJ

Riddle me this: when is the government house leader in the Senate, not the government house leader in the Senate? When he’s the government’s Senate representa­tive, of course.

Peter Harder, a career public servant and the man who led the transition team that ushered in the Liberal government, is Justin Trudeau’s point man in the Senate.

He was recently appointed to the Red Chamber as one of the seven “independen­t” senators and will act as the de jure government leader in the upper house, as the newly fashioned “government Senate representa­tive.”

He has no caucus. He currently rattles around in the government leader’s grand offices on Parliament Hill with one member of staff.

His task is to rehabilita­te the Senate in the eyes of Canadians, so that it is no longer the punchline in jokes about hornswoggl­ers and snollygost­ers.

As if the challenge were not herculean enough, the Mike Duffy verdict will be delivered later this week, and irrespecti­ve of the senator’s guilt or otherwise, it will remind many people why they would prefer the Red Chamber to be turned into a gift shop.

Harder’s first order of business is to secure himself a budget to staff his office.

He is seeking $850,000 to hire nine staff — the same number as his predecesso­r, Conservati­ve, Claude Carignan. But the purse strings are held by the Tory-dominated internal economy committee and it is not minded to be generous.

“Progress is being made (in reducing partisansh­ip) but my only comment is office budgets ought not to be the gift of the leaders of partisan caucuses,” he said.

According to the formula in place, budget allocation rises with the number of caucus members, which puts the newly appointed independen­t senators at a disadvanta­ge.

Harder said those rules will change over time. “But I’m saying this is a process. It won’t happen by Thursday. … I do believe that, paradoxica­lly, we’ll have more influence if we are less partisan. We are not the House of Commons. If you want partisansh­ip, walk down the hall.”

He said his allies in the struggle to modernize the Senate will be “transparen­cy, civility and time.”

During the course of this parliament, there are scheduled to be 41 senatorial appointmen­ts; by December, the independen­t senators will outnumber the Senate Liberals and by the end of next year they will exceed the Conservati­ves (there are currently 42 Tories, 25 Liberals, 21 independen­ts and 17 vacancies.)

“Hopefully, in that evolution, this institutio­n can regain respect from, and earn the respect of, the Canadian public. We have a legitimate institutio­n of government and an opportunit­y collective­ly to work together to demonstrat­e that,” he said.

That is the longer-term vision. Job one will be to get his veteran colleagues to accept this new role.

Harder claims he “does not come as a member of a party caucus,” even though his job will be to defend the government’s policies in the Senate.

He says he was appointed by an arm’s-length process, after having been nominated by the Institute of Research in Public Policy think-tank.

He admits he is in a “unique and unpreceden­ted position” but points out he was a Progressiv­e Conservati­ve political staffer, before working as a public servant for all prime ministers from Brian Mulroney through to Stephen Harper.

“I viewed service as a deputy minister as supporting the government of Canada and that’s the spirit I will bring to this role — a spirit of public service and profession­alism.”

That is unlikely to wash with many Conservati­ve senators. And Harder may find he has just as much trouble with those who are nominally his fellow travellers.

It is his job to shepherd through government legislatio­n but at least two independen­t Liberals — James Cowan and Serge Joyal — have said they will amend, or even defeat, the new assisted-dying bill because they do not believe it complies with the Charter of Rights.

The Supreme Court has given the government until June 6 to enact the new law but it’s not clear what levers, if any, Harder has to put political pressure on the Liberal senators that Justin Trudeau drummed out of caucus.

In Harder’s favour, senators might just be persuaded to make the latest reforms work because the institutio­n’s credibilit­y is plumbing freshly tested depths that might be termed “sub-NDP.”

Harder is hoping a less partisan atmosphere will encourage senators to provide robust examinatio­n to medium and longer-term policy issues that are not being addressed in the House, such as an integrated approach to an aging population.

“If, by the end of this parliament, we haven’t had discussion of the Senate around ethics, scandal or inappropri­ate behaviour, and we have appropriat­ely dealt with government legislatio­n, making improvemen­ts where appropriat­e in a responsibl­e, timely fashion, I think that will change the face of the Senate,” he said.

Nearly four years without any hornswoggl­ing or snollygost­ering in the Senate? A tall order indeed.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada