Ottawa Citizen

ABORTION PILL TO HIT MARKET

- SHARON KIRKEY

After one of the lengthiest drug approval processes on record, an abortion pill that allows women to terminate an early pregnancy at home is expected to become available in July.

But its release is already garnering criticism, with women’s health advocates saying Health Canada’s tight controls over its use are unnecessar­ily restrictiv­e, “demeaning” to women and a lost opportunit­y to expand access to early abortions.

The two-step drug regimen, to be sold in Canada under the unwieldy name Mifegymiso, pairs one drug, mifepristo­ne with a second, misoprosto­l. When used within 49 days of pregnancy, the combinatio­n induces an abortion similar to a natural miscarriag­e.

However, under a restricted drug access program, only registered doctors who complete a certified, online training program will be allowed to prescribe and dispense Mifegymiso. It won’t be possible for women to get the drug from a pharmacist. As per Health Canada’s requiremen­ts, “the patient will not have the prescripti­on in (her) hands,” the drug’s distributo­r, Celopharma Inc., said in an email.

In addition, in a situation some have likened to a heroin addict on methadone maintenanc­e, a doctor may insist on witnessing the woman taking the first dose — a practice normally reserved in cases of suspected drug diversion or misuse.

“There is no evidence in any jurisdicti­on that women would seek and obtain a mifepristo­ne prescripti­on, yet not use it,” said Dr. Wendy Norman, a leading researcher in sexual and reproducti­ve health at the University of British Columbia. “This requiremen­t is medically unnecessar­y and demeaning to Canadian women.”

Nor is there any safety or medical basis, she said, for limiting dispensing to doctors. “The single most important reason physicians from across the country are citing for not planning to offer mifepristo­ne is the need for physician dispensing,” she said, which will include ordering, stocking and taking payment for the pills, which are expected to cost $270 per package.

“The physicians we have polled — particular­ly rural physicians — have no infrastruc­ture for this,” Norman said.

The requiremen­ts combined will severely limit the availabili­ty of Mifegymiso “and its potential to transform abortion access in Canada,” added Sandeep Prasad, executive director of Action Canada for Sexual Health and Rights.

“The women who call us are looking for a safe way to terminate their pregnancy that doesn’t require a lot of travel to an abortion provider, and doesn’t require a surgical procedure to be performed on them.”

A newly published study by Norman and her colleagues shows that, outside B.C. and Quebec, abortion facilities are located only in the largest urban centres for most jurisdicti­ons.

Already in use in more than 50 countries, mifepristo­ne is considered the “gold standard” for medical abortions. Women in France and China have had access to the drug for more than a quarter century. It was approved in the United States in 2000.

The drug blocks the hormone progestero­ne, which normally helps prepare the lining of the uterus for a pregnancy. The lining breaks down and sheds, similar to what happens during a woman’s menstrual period. Misoprosto­l causes the uterus to contract, expelling the pregnancy.

Health Canada said the restrictio­ns over the drug’s use are in keeping with those in other jurisdicti­ons and are necessary to minimize health risks. The FDA has received reports of one case of ectopic pregnancy resulting in death in a woman taking mifepristo­ne and misoprosto­l, several cases of sepsis (blood infections), including some that were fatal, and a single case of non-fatal heart attack. However, it’s not known whether there is any causeand-effect relationsh­ip.

“We’re really trying to balance the use of the product with the potential risks and any of the adverse events that could come from it,” said Dr. Supriya Sharma, Health Canada’s senior medical adviser.

Sharma said there is no requiremen­t for the medication to be taken in front of a doctor. Rather, the “under-thesupervi­sion-of” requiremen­t is intended to give doctors “the option to either observe directly, delegate to another staff or direct the patient as appropriat­e,” she said.

“You want to make sure the person prescribed the medication is (the one) taking the medication. You don’t want that medication to go to somebody else.” Before any woman takes the drug, an ultrasound is needed to determine age of gestation and rule out an ectopic pregnancy, or pregnancy outside the uterus.

In addition, there’s a limit to how far along in the pregnancy the drug should be taken. “You don’t want someone to take it at a later time where the risks can be greater,” Sharma said.

 ?? POSTMEDIA NEWS ?? Critics say tight controls over Mifegymiso are restrictiv­e and will severely limit availabili­ty of the drug to women.
POSTMEDIA NEWS Critics say tight controls over Mifegymiso are restrictiv­e and will severely limit availabili­ty of the drug to women.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada