Ottawa Citizen

Liberals will pay for neglect of our Armed Forces

The presidency of Donald Trump won’t tolerate free riders, warns Douglas Bland.

- Dr. Douglas Bland is professor emeritus, Queen’s University and a retired Canadian Armed Forces lieutenant-colonel.

The government of Canada has a duty to provide to citizens a comprehens­ive explanatio­n of its national defence policies. After more than a year in office, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has yet to reveal his defence policy and its supporting multi-billiondol­lar budget.

In April, the prime minister launched public consultati­ons on security challenges, the role of the military in facing “current threats and challenges,” and what resources might be necessary to carry out its mandate — oddly, without defining what that mandate might be.

These consultati­ons attracted 4,700 Canadians to public meetings and produced 20,200 “submission­s.” The review ended in July and its conclusion­s were apparently presented to cabinet in October, but they have been withheld from the public. Indeed, Trudeau seems to have decided not to present a national defence policy to Parliament until sometime in mid-2017 or later.

Defence policy or not, the Liberal government, among other fundamenta­l defence policy decisions, withdrew Canada’s CF-18 fighters from the battle against ISIL insurgents; committed hundreds of military advisers to near-combat operations in Iraq and other areas in that dangerous region without the courtesy of even a take-note debate in Parliament; sent or plans to send large units on vague missions in Eastern Europe; dithers over committing perhaps hundreds more military personnel to risky, ill-defined missions in Africa and perhaps elsewhere; confounded defence procuremen­t strategies by, for example, cancelling plans to replace Canada’s aging CF-18 fleet and hesitating to confirm other major projects; and after a year in office, has failed to define its annual multi-billion-dollar defence budget.

The reality, however, is that Trudeau does have an active, but undeclared, traditiona­l Liberal national defence policy founded on the long-standing Liberal defence bromide: You must not take the CAF seriously. It will not be required for the defence of the country, as the United States will protect us from enemy aggression.

Liberal government­s were compelled by public opinion to build significan­t military forces during the First and Second World Wars and in the early years of the Cold War. After 1960, political support for a modern, robust Canadian Forces gradually, then rapidly, faded from the national political agenda.

The Liberal government’s 1964 White Paper On Defence raised “doubts” about the traditiona­l structure of armed forces and looked to “organizati­onal efficienci­es” to reduce defence spending. Former prime minister Pierre Trudeau’s 1971 defence white paper belittled the traditiona­l roles of armed forces, “(especially) at a time when national social and economic needs (were) considerab­le.”

Prime minister Jean Chrétien’s 1994 defence white paper was clear and ultimately disarming: “Everything is being made leaner, everything is undergoing the closest scrutiny.” Deep cuts were made to budgets, infrastruc­ture and administra­tion, but most radically to operationa­l capabiliti­es and to plans and budgets intended to modernizat­ion of next-generation armed force.

The tradition continues. Trudeau’s national defence policy will also aim to produce, as he announced during the election, “a leaner, more agile” defence force, a target that can be achieved only by reducing CAF operationa­l capabiliti­es.

Informed observers expect that, as a minimum, Trudeau will reduce significan­tly the defence budget, cut the personnel strength of army and militia units; delay plans to rebuild the navy’s dilapidate­d submarine fleet; greatly restructur­e downward the navy’s shipbuildi­ng program; and delay into the far future any decision to replace the CF-18 fleet.

If Trudeau believes, after the election of Donald Trump, that Canada can continue to freeride on the defence policies and budgets of the United States, then he will be greatly disappoint­ed after his first meeting with the president-elect.

Better for Canada’s security and relations with the United States if Trudeau immediatel­y assured Trump that Canada intends to significan­tly modernize the Canadian Forces and shows him his government’s budget to do so.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada