Ottawa Citizen

A HISTORY OF MOOCHING

Some experts say dogs and cats take advantage of humans — like parasites

- SARAH KAPLAN

Have our pets hoodwinked us?

Why do we humans love our pets so much?

“It really is an amazing question,” says Clive Wynne, director of the Canine Science Collaborat­ory at Arizona State University, who has devoted his career to studying animal behaviour and the evolutiona­ry relationsh­ip between animals and people.

It’s easy to see why our pets would love us, he says: “The success of dogs (and other domesticat­ed creatures) on the surface of the Earth is entirely due to the fact that we take some level of care of them.”

In fact, some scientists have suggested pets exhibit a form of parasitism — taking food and shelter from humans without offering much in return. “They argue that we love our pets because they have hoodwinked us into it,” Wynne says.

He doesn’t buy that argument. (Then again, he is a dog owner — he’s under the spell.) But he acknowledg­es there’s no satisfying evolutiona­ry explanatio­n for that warm, gooey feeling we get when we look at our dogs and cats.

This love story started with dogs, our most ancient animal companions. Analysis of dog and wolf genomes, along with numerous discoverie­s of ancient bone, suggests humans domesticat­ed our canine friends somewhere between 13,000 and 30,000 years ago.

Wynne thinks it’s likely the animals started out as wolves that scavenged from human garbage pits; those willing to get closer to people got more food and they evolved to become tamer over time.

But even then, it’s not clear we loved dogs, Wynne said. That change happened around 10,000 years ago, when dogs started showing up in artwork and burial grounds. Last year, scientists discovered an ancient cemetery near Siberia’s Lake Baikal where 5,000to 8,000-year-old dogs were buried alongside humans.

“You get dog burials, which show there was a lot of care and attention paid to the burial,” Wynne said, “and they include grave goods (valuable items placed in the grave for use in the afterlife), which really seems like there was a strong indication of affection.”

By ancient Egyptian times, household pets were laid to rest in elaborate tombs decorated with inscriptio­ns, furnished with treasure and scented by incense. (Though archeologi­sts believe some of the dogs were likely raised specifical­ly to be killed, making the gesture seem somewhat less thoughtful.)

If dogs evolved to be the companions of human hunters, then cats came along to be farmers’ pets. DNA evidence suggests cats were first tamed by the Natufians, who lived in the Levant roughly 10,000 years ago and are often credited with being the inventors of agricultur­e. Cats, the logic goes, are very useful for catching the rodents that inevitably inhabit grain storehouse­s.

In the cases of both species, the process of domesticat­ion probably started with the animals themselves; tamer animals were better able to take advantage of the resources made available by human settlement­s. Then people got involved, selectivel­y breeding the cutest, cuddliest and most co-operative creatures until we got the pets we know today.

So that’s how we came to love animals, but it still doesn’t really explain why. For one thing, Wynne notes, dogs and cats really aren’t that useful anymore.

“My own dog, who I love out of all proportion, is utterly and completely useless,” he said.

For several decades, it was believed pet ownership was good for humans’ physical and mental health. But a 2009 study of nearly 40,000 people in Sweden found pet owners suffered from more mental-health problems than their nonpet-owning peers.

Then again, some argue our love for pets is purely social, rather than biological. After all, a 2015 survey of more than 60 countries found that even though dogs were kept in 52 countries, they were considered companions in fewer than half of them. Harold Herzog, a psychologi­st at Western Carolina University, has written that love for pets is a contagious habit we “catch” from our peers.

As a scientist, Wynne isn’t happy with any of the theories put forward to explain our love for our pets. He’d like to see more and better data — perhaps an experiment that examined brain scans of people taken while they looked at cats and dogs.

But as someone who knows what it’s like to love a dog, he was willing to indulge in some unscientif­ic musing. Wynne noted domesticat­ed dogs are very childlike: They exhibit several behaviours usually found only among juveniles in wild animals, such as licking their owners’ faces, and they’re unable to survive on their own. When Wynne’s family adopted their dog, his wife (“who is an engineer and very practical,” he said) remarked that perhaps they should have had more kids.

“She perceived that some buttons were being pressed that were pressed when we had our child,” Wynne said.

Maybe that’s all there is to it: Humans are programmed to love soft and helpless things. The Washington Post

 ??  ??
 ?? GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O ?? Could human love for pets be contagious?
GETTY IMAGES/ISTOCKPHOT­O Could human love for pets be contagious?

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada