Ottawa Citizen

Informatio­n crusader digs for LRT paperwork

Rideau Transit Group keeps tight grip on records of $2.1B project’s problems

- JON WILLING

Ken Rubin wants to know what’s going on beneath the surface.

But the Ottawa access-to-informatio­n expert is hitting one roadblock after the next as he tries to get access to records showing problems that have arisen during the constructi­on of the city’s largest ever infrastruc­ture project, the Confederat­ion Line LRT.

His battle underscore­s the level of secrecy, or confidenti­ality, that’s accompanie­d the building of city’s $2.1-billion light-rail line., due in part to the contractor’s tight control of informatio­n.

“You can’t bury your head in the tunnel,” Rubin said. “You have to come out and relate to people.”

Rubin is fighting to get complete disclosure of the “non-conformanc­e” reports produced in 2015 and 2016 kept by the city on the LRT project.

Rubin said the city and contractor Rideau Transit Group should remember that it’s the largest project in the city’s history and that taxpayers want to know about its progress, even if there are blemishes.

He appealed to the informatio­n and privacy commission­er of Ontario last January after getting a sense that there were, in his view, delays by the city and RTG.

The city authorized the release of 64 reports in early August 2017 but Rubin continues to fight for the disclosure of more records.

The reports contain informatio­n about the deficienci­es found in the constructi­on and other processes.

Each report has details of the glitch and how it was fixed.

Dozens of inspection reports documentin­g deficienci­es, such as bad welds and crummy workmanshi­p, illustrate the quality control in effect during the constructi­on of Ottawa’s LRT line.

The Citizen reviewed 64 “nonconform­ance” reports produced during audits of constructi­on along the LRT line. The city sent the documents to researcher Ken Rubin after he made an access-toinformat­ion request for all reports produced in 2015 and 2016. He is still seeking more records.

Such reports are common in the constructi­on industry as builders’ work is inspected to ensure its quality.

Non-conformanc­e reports — hundreds have been produced on the LRT project — can be made by the quality-control experts working either for the private contractor­s or for the city.

Substantia­lly more will be produced by the constructi­on firm itself, said Steve Cripps, the city’s director of O-Train constructi­on.

According to Cripps, non-conformanc­e doesn’t always relate to the physical constructi­on of the LRT line. A report could be generated if someone forgot to follow a process, such as sending documentat­ion to a department.

“When the system works right, it’s not supposed to be the city being Big Brother, saying, ‘I caught you and I’m issuing a non-conformanc­e report.’ It should be all parties catching things and correcting them,” Cripps said.

It might seem odd, meanwhile, to have the contractor inspect its own labour and issue deficiency reports, but Cripps said that’s how quality management works.

Cripps said when the contractor doesn’t agree with a city-identified deficiency, the disagreeme­nt can be dealt with by different levels of the organizati­ons. In the worstcase scenario, the disagreeme­nt goes to a formal dispute resolution process, which hasn’t yet happened with the Ottawa LRT.

During an inspection of an architectu­ral concrete mock-up at Cyrville station, city staff wrote down several deficienci­es, such as staining and discolorat­ion. The contractor objected to the city’s analysis, prompting the city to fire back. “It will be more effective to work on resolving the numerous concerns expressed on the architectu­ral concrete quality, taking into account that the architectu­ral concrete pouring is well advanced on the project instead of objecting to this (non-conformanc­e report),” the city wrote.

According to RTG’s written responses to Citizen questions, the consortium “maintains a rigorous quality management system in accordance to the city’s expectatio­ns” and internatio­nal standards.

The consortium couldn’t provide informatio­n on the number of non-compliance reports that have been generated on the project, the number of subcontrac­tors on the project and whether any subcontrac­tors have been removed because of the quantity of deficienci­es or the quality of workmanshi­p.

The city recently retained an independen­t safety auditor, TÜV Rheinland, to make sure the LRT system has been designed, constructe­d and commission­ed to safety standards. It’s not an unusual step. The firm will be working until the trains start carrying passengers at some point in 2018.

Cripps said his office is happy with the quality of constructi­on on the Confederat­ion Line LRT so far.

“When we do audits we’ll always find some things, but there hasn’t been anything of substance that shows a major breakdown in their (quality control) systems,” Cripps said. “That’s really what it’s all about, having the systems in place and the people to implement those systems.”

When we do audits we’ll always find some things, but there hasn’t been anything of substance that shows a major breakdown ...

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada