Ottawa Citizen

SALLY ANN: YES OR NO

Visions of need differ

- Tim Richter is president and CEO of the Canadian Alliance to End Homelessne­ss. Twitter: @

The heated debate on the Salvation Army’s proposed Vanier project reminds me of Henry Ford’s quote, “If you always do what you’ve always done, you’ll always get what you’ve always got.”

The Salvation Army has been a leader in social services since it first arrived in Canada in 1882. Today, it plays a leading role in nearly every homeless system in Canada, including Ottawa.

As an early adopter of “Housing First,” homelessne­ss data systems, prioritiza­tion and co-ordinated access, the City of Ottawa has been breaking new ground in the drive to end homelessne­ss in Canada. The Salvation Army has also been a key partner with the city in the delivery of Housing First.

Both the city and the Salvation Army have shown a willingnes­s to collaborat­e and drive innovation, which is one reason the project the Salvation Army proposes in Vanier seems so out of place. By keeping a focus on shelter and transition­al housing, the Vanier project is more of what we’ve always done.

The controvers­y over the Vanier project presents an opportunit­y for the City of Ottawa and the Salvation Army to do something truly transforma­tional.

Let’s look at the numbers. Today, there are 943 emergency shelter beds in Ottawa. According to data released by the Ottawa Alliance to End Homelessne­ss, 7,170 different people used an emergency shelter in Ottawa in 2016. Of them, 618 people were experienci­ng chronic or episodic homelessne­ss.

This means that, for most people experienci­ng homelessne­ss in Ottawa, the experience is short-term; they are likely in and out of homelessne­ss within days and never come back. A minority are homeless long-term or repeatedly. This minority, about nine per cent of the annual total, uses a disproport­ionately large share of the shelter beds — potentiall­y as many as 50 per cent.

While there will always be a need for some emergency shelter for short-term use, if we want to reduce homelessne­ss we need to get people into permanent housing and keep them there. A significan­t part of Ottawa’s shelter demand comes from people who are effectivel­y using shelter as housing, which begs the question: Should we replace a shelter with a shelter, or replace a shelter with housing?

What if we took the Salvation Army’s proposed $50-million investment in shelter and transition­al housing and instead put that into permanent supportive housing for chronicall­y homeless people? What if we combined that new housing with the city’s Housing First investment­s and affordable housing constructi­on; shifted shelter operating dollars to shelter diversion and rapid rehousing programs; and used city homeless system data to target these interventi­ons?

Ottawa would soon find its homeless system transforme­d and be achieving dramatic reductions in homelessne­ss.

Admittedly, this is easier said than done, but Ottawa can look to Finland for inspiratio­n. Faced with similar shelter statistics, the Finns shifted focus to a Housing First approach and began by converting a 236-bed Salvation Army shelter in Helsinki to an 86-unit permanent supportive housing complex. In the last three years, Finland has reduced homelessne­ss 10 per cent nationwide, when every other European country has seen increases. In Finland, the Salvation Army is a leader in the housing system, but it has shifted toward permanent housing and away from shelter and transition­al housing.

There are lessons closer to home too. Facing a rise in family homelessne­ss like Ottawa, the Region of Waterloo developed a family shelter diversion program in 2014 that reduced family shelter use by 64 per cent. Using a Housing First approach, Hamilton has reduced chronic homelessne­ss 35 per cent in just two years and Edmonton has reduced overall homelessne­ss 43 per cent since 2008.

There’s no better time than now for the City of Ottawa and the Salvation Army to forge a new path. The federal government is about to release a national housing strategy, while Ontario has made a commitment to end chronic homelessne­ss, and both government­s are making long-term investment­s in housing and Housing First initiative­s. Leadership and innovation will find strong support from senior government­s.

I would look at the heated debate on the Vanier project as a blessing in disguise: It’s a chance to take a step back and dream up a bigger, bolder plan to transform Ottawa’s homeless system with the Salvation Army taking a leading role.

The Salvation Army’s mission includes a desire to be a “transformi­ng influence in the communitie­s of our world.” Revisiting the Vanier project would be a good start.

 ??  ??
 ?? TONY CALDWELL ?? Denise Beauchamp, a homeowner in Vanier, is one of many people who do not want a proposed new $50-million Salvation Army facility for shelter and transition­al housing as a neighbour.
TONY CALDWELL Denise Beauchamp, a homeowner in Vanier, is one of many people who do not want a proposed new $50-million Salvation Army facility for shelter and transition­al housing as a neighbour.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada