Amid turmoil of #MeToo, what’s next in law, life?
Experts, lawyers and lawmakers grapple with rights and equality
The intemperate remarks of a then-U.S. presidential candidate, the ostracization of a Hollywood mogul and last week’s stunning fall from grace of the leader of Ontario’s loyal opposition: Suddenly, allegations of harassment, assault and abuse are everywhere.
But it’s hardly sudden for some victims, who’ve maintained silence for years. They are coming forward; they’re being heard.
To get a handle on just what truly qualifies as sexual misconduct, Joanne Laucius speaks to experts in law, academia and advocacy. The answers, it turns out, depend on whom you ask.
And as the cultural reckoning with sexual harassment sweeps across North America, Stuart Thomson writes, Canada’s labour minister has declared a crisis in her own workplace.
Patty Hajdu said women have been fending for themselves for far too long on the Hill, where older, powerful men socialize with younger, precariously employed staffers — with the addition of “liberal access to alcohol.”
Bill C-65 aims to extend labour code coverage to Hill staffers.
But alleged transgressions are not limited to sex.
David Reevely explains how an Eastern Ontario Tory MPP has become embroiled in an internal party investigation into whether he physically accosted a woman who has since become a fellow candidate for the next provincial election.
Ontario’s Progressive Conservatives have hired an investigator to probe a complaint from their candidate in the south Ottawa riding of Carleton that she was physically accosted by Ottawa Valley MPP Randy Hillier at a party convention in Ottawa in 2016.
Goldie Ghamari, the nominated Tory candidate in the new south-Ottawa riding of Carleton, wrote on Twitter Sunday night that “a sitting #PCPO MPP harassed me, intimidated me, & used his body to bully and scare me out of getting involved in politics.”
She didn’t name the MPP, but challenged him to come forward before the story — this story — broke.
Hillier, the MPP for Lanark-Frontenac-Lennox and Addington, promptly did. The two had met at their party’s Ottawa convention in March 2016, he replied, but never had any physical contact or unpleasant words. He wished her well in her campaign and looked forward to seeing her in caucus in the next election, he wrote.
This story arises from an anonymous Twitter message I got and followed up on last week. Ghamari answered questions I asked, starting last Thursday. The two politicians tell versions of events that disagree in important ways and the Progressive Conservative party wants to get to the bottom of it.
“While Ms. Ghamari declined to pursue her complaint at the time, the party has now hired a third-party investigator to provide clarity on what occurred that evening. We will provide further details upon its completion,” a high-ranking PC party official said, asking not to be named because, amid the chaos of leader Patrick Brown’s departure, there’s actually nobody in the Tory party whose job it is to speak for it at the moment.
In Ghamari’s telling, Hillier noticed her outside the convention centre in the evening of March 5, 2016. She was getting fresh air and checking her messages; he was having a cigarette. He walked up, slung an arm around her shoulders and pulled her in close. Hillier is tall, stocky and solid. Ghamari is slight — five-foot-two and 110 pounds, she says.
“He was smoking, his cigarette was in his left hand, and it was clear that he was drunk. It was just very obvious from the way he was walking and I could smell the alcohol on his breath,” she said. “His fingers were digging into my shoulder and his cigarette was still in his hand as well, so when he’s doing that … it was almost right in my face.”
At the time, Ghamari was on the fringes of the Progressive Conservative party, considering running for office but not declared yet. Nepean-Carleton MPP Lisa MacLeod and Carleton-Mississippi Mills MPP Jack MacLaren were close to open war for control of the Tory operation in Eastern Ontario. MacLeod’s riding was being cut up in a redistribution and she hadn’t yet said whether she intended to run in Nepean or Carleton.
In some quarters, Ghamari’s interest in running before MacLeod had made her choice was seen as gauche. She certainly was not part of MacLeod’s circle. Even after Ghamari won, MacLeod criticized her as a bad choice for the party who put a fairly safe seat at risk.
“Are you Goldie from Nepean?” Ghamari said Hillier asked. “Are you running against Lisa?”
Ghamari was surprised and confused and didn’t recognize the MPP, she said, and said no, she wasn’t.
Ghamari goes by “Goldie” but her legal name is Golsa. Due to a quirk at the convention, her badge identified her as Golsa from Kingston and the Islands.
“He seemed sort of shocked and he grabbed my lanyard, my name tag, and looked at it and then he was like, ‘Huh,’ and then he just walked away.”
The exchange was brief but frightening, she said. It wasn’t until later that she realized she’d been talking to Hillier.
“It doesn’t seem like a lot but that physical contact was unwanted, I didn’t know who this person was, and it was very obvious that he was intimidating me using his body,” Ghamari said. “The way the cigarette was so close to my face, and just with him being right in my face, it was just a very — I feel like if it was someone else, another woman, she would have been incredibly intimidated and might not even have run (for office).
“I believe that it is inappropriate for someone to go up to a perfect stranger, make very intimate physical contact, where pretty much the entire side of their bodies are touching, put them in a one-armed bear-hug, bring them in close, lean in close to their face — literally within a centimetre — and have a very intimidating presence and inquire as to one’s intentions,” Ghamari said. “Especially if you don’t know that person, you don’t know how they heard about these intentions. I just think it was inappropriate.”
Hillier’s account, conveyed in an interview Monday, is different in key ways. He and Ghamari did encounter each other outside the convention centre, he said, but it was in the afternoon and the sun was still up.
“There was some small chatter and pleasantries exchanged. And there was (nothing) further — I found out who she was, because up until that moment, I had no idea who she was,” Hillier said.
He’d had a beer or two but was sober at the time, he said.
“Of course — you know. It’s, at conventions, and not just conventions, I do enjoy a beer,” he said. “There was business to be done, as well as social time, so there’s no falling over drunk or anything like that.”
He never touched her or came close to it, he said: “I didn’t get closer than five feet to her.”
The two also have different versions of how the party dealt with the situation.
Ghamari said she mentioned the incident to a friend who was also involved in the party. The friend put her in touch with Bob Stanley, the party executive director (until this past weekend, when interim leader Vic Fedeli dismissed him), who set up a conference call with Nicolas Pappalardo, who was then Brown’s chief of staff (he resigned in February 2017 to rejoin his family business in Toronto).
Ghamari’s recordings of the calls have the two senior party officials questioning her for details and saying all the right things. A party MPP physically accosting someone is not OK, they told her, and promised to investigate.
She wanted a written apology saying it was wrong for Hillier to have touched her, she said, and that would be enough.
In another call among the three, Ghamari said Pappalardo reported to her that he’d asked Hillier what happened and Hillier said he’d spoken to Ghamari, but had never touched her. He said he’d had some drinks at the convention in the evening, but that their encounter was in the afternoon, not after dark. He was willing to apologize if he’d said anything to offend or concern her, but that was all.
Since Hillier had denied anything untoward happened, Pappalardo wasn’t sure what to do, Ghamari said.
Ghamari suggested checking the security-camera footage.
The convention centre does have an extensive security-camera operation, Stanley reported back, and keeps recordings for several weeks. But the evidence on the tape was mixed.
It did show Ghamari and Hillier separately heading out the doors of the convention centre in the evening, Stanley said. But any interaction between them outside was in a blind spot, not captured by any camera.
“I was just basically told if I wanted to take it to court, I could take it to court, and that’s up to me,” Ghamari said.
Hillier agrees that Pappalardo talked to him about Ghamari’s complaint, though he said nobody asked him for an apology.
“I was approached by Nic Pappalardo after the convention, the chief of staff of the party,” Hillier said. “He told me there was an allegation from a young woman that a middle-aged man, they didn’t know who the person was, but a middle-aged man who somewhat had a similar description to me, had intimidated a young woman in the Ontario Landowners Association hospitality suite at the convention.
“Now, of course, anyone who knows me knows that I wouldn’t be caught dead anywhere near an Ontario Landowners Association hospitality suite, nor would I be welcomed.”
The landowners’ association does not come up on the recordings I’ve heard of her conversations with Stanley and Pappalardo. All the details she gives them are about an incident outside the convention centre.
Hillier and Pappalardo had a followup conversation, Hillier said.
“He told me that they reviewed all the security tapes from the convention centre and also inquired from other people who was at the Ontario Landowners Association hospitality suite, and my version of the facts were borne out,” Hillier said. “That was the end of it, essentially.”
In his Monday email, Pappalardo said “the video did show them both exiting the building in the evening and going off camera. She is seen coming back in a few minutes later.” But he agreed that whatever might have happened between them, there’s no security footage of it.
“At that time, I explained to Ms. Ghamari that Mr. Hillier had denied the incident and that I was unable to find any helpful video evidence,” Pappalardo said. “We had also concluded there were no identifiable eye witnesses. I suggested to her that under the circumstances, the ball was in her court and that she was free to launch a formal complaint under any applicable law or standard in the appropriate forum and that we would fully co-operate. Given her legal background, I had no doubt she understood her options. That was our last exchange on the subject.”
According to Hillier, Ghamari is resurrecting an old complaint for political reasons.
“We know that there’s a lot of turmoil in the party at the moment. But clearly, one would, I think it would be reasonable to believe that there’s some political motivations behind these new allegations at this time,” Hillier said. “The record is clear that Ms. Ghamari was a candidate that was selected by Patrick Brown. There was some level of dispute and consternation with her nomination. We know, with what has transpired recently in the party, that there were those people who were supportive of Brown and people who were less supportive. And it’s clear Ms. Ghamari and I were on different sides of this divide.”
Ghamari said she was reluctant to talk about the incident, but it’s part of an important discussion.
“I would not put this at the level of any sort of inappropriate sexual behaviour. I don’t ever want it to be perceived that way,” she said. “But I think in the sense of how women are generally treated in certain industries and certain professions, it’s something that unfortunately is far too common and I think part of the reason why women might not get into these industries as much is because of behaviour like this. I’m glad that it’s coming out, in all different areas, because I think it’s important for everyone to be treated respectfully. I think it’s important for everyone to be treated as equals. And I think everyone should have a fair chance to do whatever they want to do based on their merits and their capabilities.”
… that physical contact was unwanted, I didn’t know who this person was, and it was very obvious that he was intimidating me using his body.