Coalition urges CRTC to block websites with pirated content

A new coalition wants the federal broadcast regulator to block websites that provide access to pirated content to stop the thousands of Canadians who illegally stream movies, live sports and television shows.

Content creators, unions and some of Canada’s largest communications companies including BCE Inc., Rogers Communications Inc. and Quebecor Inc. filed an application on Monday asking the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission to take action against pirated content, which they say chips away at Canada’s $55-billion cultural industries and the 630,000 jobs they provide.

The group called Fair Play Canada wants the CRTC to create an “Independent Piracy Review Agency” that would identify websites that blatantly steal content. The CRTC would then require all Canadian internet service providers to block said websites. If a party took issue with the mandatory blocking list, they could take it up with the Federal Court of Appeal.

The application comes as more consumers access content online, legally or illegally.

While Netflix continues to grow in Canada (there are an estimated six million subscribers), broadcasters are dealing with cord cutting as television subscriptions and revenue dip despite a growing population. Meantime, a 2017 study from Sandvine estimated that more than one million Canadian households used Android boxes with applications that allow them to access pirated TV for free or for cheap.

But the piracy-fighting proposal is controversial. While many across creative industries support the idea — the measures intend to get pirated content off-line faster, and thus keep consumers in paid environments — others criticize it for violating net neutrality, the principle that internet providers treat all content equally.

The fear is that companies could get overzealous in blocking, especially given providers such as Bell, Rogers and Quebecor own both content and the distribution channels.

Bell floated the idea of blacklisting websites in government hearings on NAFTA last fall, prompting internet lawyer Michael Geist to write a series of posts criticizing what he called an aggressive, anticonsumer, anti-speech proposal. He highlighted the risks of allowing a third-party panel to block websites without court oversight. Consumer advocacy group Open Media also opposed the idea.

The coalition represents more than 25 organizations including the CBC, TIFF, Unifor, Cogeco Connexion, Corus Entertainment Inc., Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment (MLSE), Ethnic Channels Group and DHX Media.