Open banking ‘almost inevitable’
Fintechs back system where consumers own rights to their financial information
TORONTO Upstarts in the financial sector say the data-driven concept of “open banking” could inject a healthy dose of competition into Canada’s highly concentrated financial services industry. But it may take some convincing to get the bigger players to embrace the idea.
Last week marked the deadline for submissions to the federal government’s consultation on the framework, which if adopted could allow consumers and businesses to make their financial transaction data available to third parties.
That information is currently controlled by banks and other financial institutions used by the consumer. If that data was portable, however, other parties could potentially use it to better price or tailor products or services, such as an app that would let a customer keep tabs on all of their accounts at various banks through a single dashboard, without violating their bank’s terms and conditions.
A spokesperson for the Department of Finance Canada said they had received more than 95 submissions for the consultation, the results of which will be made public.
Among the parties that made submissions in favour of some degree of open banking were Toronto-based alternative lender Equitable Bank and Portag3 Ventures, a venture capital fund backed by Power Corp. of Canada that has invested in fintech companies such as robo-adviser Wealthsimple.
Equitable, Canada’s ninth-largest independent lender, said a framework that supports the idea of customers owning the rights to their own financial data would increase “the competitive intensity ” of the banking industry.
Andrew Moor, president and CEO of Equitable, said their view is people should shop for the best banking services they can get. “We don’t really think that that’s necessarily provided by one institution,” he said. “And open banking makes all of that much easier.”
Portag3 Ventures, meanwhile, predicted in its submission, published on its website, that open banking would “stimulate” competition in the sector. “Canada lacks a specific focus on competition in regulating financial services, especially compared with the U.K. and Australia, countries with very similar banking sector market structures,” the submission stated.
The current consideration of open banking comes as technology is disrupting industries around the world. Despite the sea change, Canada’s banking sector has remained under the control of a handful of financial institutions. Portag3 noted that, in Canada, the Top Six Canadian banks hold 90 per cent of assets “and also dominate in all aspects of retail banking.”
While Canada’s major lenders have spent billions on technology and innovation, including partnerships with upstart financial technology players, they appear to be lukewarm to the idea of open banking — or anything that risks opening the financial system to third parties.
Sue Britton, CEO of the FinTech Growth Syndicate, said the types of fintechs that financial institutions are partnering with are more business-to-business firms that complement a bank’s operations, rather than compete with it. “The primary focus of the Canadian financial institutions is to largely build things themselves and continue to more improve things like the customer experience than the price we pay.”
None of the big five banks responded to questions for this article. However, the Canadian Bankers Association’s submission to the open-banking consultation divided the industry group’s concerns, and potential remedies, into four main areas: consumer protection, privacy and confidentiality, financial crime and financial stability.
For example, the CBA said when more parties are transmitting and storing financial-transaction data, the risk of identity theft increases as well. “Along with the benefits it could provide, key risks should also be addressed,” a CBA spokesperson said in an email.
Even if there are security concerns, the banking sector is still preparing for open banking.
A report published in January by consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers included a section featuring Bank of Montreal CEO Darryl White, who the study said saw open banking “as an exciting development for Canada.”
“If we can figure out how to solve for security, transparency and control, we can have an open banking system in this country that could work very well, in my view,” White is quoted as saying.
The CBA has also been calling on the federal government to create a digital identification system, with open banking cited as a reason.
One provider of financial services software, including products that can be used with open banking, says the level of interest from financial institutions and their executives has picked up. “I think that we’re hearing and we’re seeing a lot of them trying to figure out what they can do and what they should do to be ready for this change,” said Meenaz Sunderji, senior vice-president of partner growth and sales at Zafin, a Toronto-based financial technology company.
Nations other than Canada are already tinkering with open banking. Global consulting firm McKinsey noted in its annual banking review in November that 22 countries, accounting for 60 per cent of worldwide banking revenues, are mandating some form of the system.
Consulting firm Ernst & Young recently ranked Canada as eighth out of 10 of its global peers when it comes to readiness for open banking. Meantime, an advisory committee appointed by the government will assess the merits of open banking, the finance department spokesperson said. The committee will then evaluate “implementation considerations” later this year, “with the highest regard for consumer privacy, security and financial stability.”
However, the changes in technology and the fact that other jurisdictions are adopting some form of the system could force the country to take the plunge. “I think it’s almost inevitable,” Moor said.