Ottawa Citizen

U.K.’s pro-Huawei signals give Canada breathing space on 5G decision: expert

Britain believes Chinese telecom’s equipment can be used with safeguards

- JIM BRONSKILL

Canadian officials will be “cheering from the sidelines” over fresh signals that Britain believes it can manage any security risks posed by Huawei Technologi­es’ involvemen­t in building a next-generation wireless data network, says an intelligen­ce expert who closely studies the issue.

British media reports say the U.K. National Cyber Security Centre has concluded that with care and safeguards, Huawei equipment can be used in “5G” networks, amid pressure from the United States to ban the Chinese supplier.

If Britain gives Huawei a cautious green light, it will allow Canada room to make an independen­t decision, said Wesley Wark, an intelligen­ce expert who teaches at the University of Ottawa.

“Whether such an approach can prevail in Canada in the face of U.S. pressure is the question for us, as it is for Britain and Europe,” Wark said Monday.

The federal government is weighing Huawei’s possible participat­ion in 5G wireless systems that will allow Canadians to do more on cellphones and other internet-connected devices at vastly greater speeds.

China’s National Intelligen­ce Law says that Chinese organizati­ons and citizens shall support, assist and co-operate with state intelligen­ce work, prompting national security concerns in Canada.

Some security analysts argue that a Huawei role in 5G could give it access to a wide range of digital data gleaned from how, when and where Canadian customers use their electronic devices. In turn, government security agencies of a communist country with global ambitions would prize such informatio­n.

Huawei, though it is one of China’s marquee internatio­nal companies, emphasizes it is not a state-controlled enterprise and says it would never spy on behalf of Beijing or anyone else.

Still, three of Canada’s partners in the Five Eyes intelligen­ce-sharing group — the United States, Australia and New Zealand — have forbidden the use of Huawei products in 5G network developmen­t, though the U.S. ban is limited to government agencies — at least for now.

The Trump administra­tion is said to be developing an executive order that would effectivel­y ban U.S. firms from using components from China in key telecom networks.

The U.S. lacks a leading corporate player in the 5G supplier game, fuelling suggestion­s that Washington’s drumbeat of fear is propelled by commercial worries as much as security and legal concerns.

Tension and speculatio­n concerning Canada’s coming decision on 5G have been heightened by the December arrest of Huawei’s chief financial officer, Meng Wanzhou, in Vancouver following a request from U.S. authoritie­s and the subsequent detention of two Canadians by China on security grounds.

Wark pointed to Huawei’s history of fostering technologi­cal innovation in Canada and supplying quality gear to major telecommun­ications providers as reasons to assess the security risks on rational, technical grounds.

He says an important marker in the British debate came recently in an opinion piece published in the Financial Times by Robert Hannigan, former head of the British signals-intelligen­ce and cybersecur­ity agency, the Government Communicat­ions Headquarte­rs.

Hannigan argued that British security officials had never found evidence of Huawei involvemen­t in Chinese state-sponsored cyberespio­nage, and that political fashion or trade wars should not eclipse rational assessment of risk.

“Canadian officials will be cheering from the sidelines as the Canadian government ponders its own internal review of the threat posed by Huawei,” Wark said. “The British approach, if it proves to be one of managed risk, will give Canada breathing space to resist the U.S. campaign and develop a similar strategy.”

On Monday, China’s government accused the U.S. of trying to block its industrial developmen­t by alleging that Chinese mobile network gear poses a cybersecur­ity threat to countries rolling out new internet systems.

The U.S. argues that Beijing might use Chinese tech companies to gather intelligen­ce about foreign countries. The Trump administra­tion has been putting pressure on allies to shun networks supplied by Huawei, threatenin­g the company’s access to markets for next-generation wireless gear.

Washington is trying to “fabricate an excuse for suppressin­g the legitimate developmen­t” of Chinese firms, said the spokesman for the Chinese foreign ministry, Geng Shuang.

U.S. Vice-President Mike Pence, speaking last weekend in Germany, urged European allies to take seriously “the threat” he said was posed by Huawei as they look for partners to build the new 5G mobile networks.

The 5G technology is meant to vastly expand the reach of networks to support internet-linked medical equipment, factory machines, self-driving cars and other devices. That makes it more politicall­y sensitive and raises the potential cost of security failures.

Pence said Huawei and other Chinese telecom equipment makers provide Beijing with “access to any data that touches their network or equipment.” He appealed to European government­s to “reject any enterprise that would compromise the integrity of our communicat­ions technology or our national security systems.”

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada