FOR GOOD DRAMA, YOU CAN'T BEAT COLLEGE FOOTBALL
Safe, not safe — make no mistake, decisions are based on money, John Feinstein writes.
If you have been following the wildly popular new soap opera, “As Big Ten Football Turns,” you know there were more rumours in the last week than there are players at the conference's 14 schools.
A formalized decision from the league's presidents and chancellors to reverse their previous position and begin play in October was supposed to come over the weekend, but nothing happened on Sunday. Or Monday.
Tuesday's big news: The president of Nebraska was caught on a hot mike, saying a decision was coming that night.
That's how ludicrous the whole thing had become.
Finally came Wednesday's official announcement: The conference will begin play the weekend of Oct. 24 and play eight games in eight weeks, with the regular season ending on Dec. 12.
Oh, and the College Football Playoff committee has pushed its announcement of the four teams that will play for whatever passes as a championship this season to Dec. 20. That accounts for both the start and end dates for the new Big Ten season.
Welcome to U.S. college football in 2020.
Let's review for a moment. First, in mid-August, the Big Ten and the Pac-12 weren't playing. The ACC, the SEC and the Big 12 were playing — although the jokes about the Big 12 have been coming fast and furious since Saturday, when Iowa State lost to Louisiana, Kansas State was downed by Arkansas State and Kansas lost to Coastal Carolina.
All three winners are members of the powerhouse Sun Belt Conference. Perhaps that league should be promoted to the Power Five while the Big 12 champion is awarded a spot in the New Orleans Bowl — or whatever that bowl's corporate name is this year.
The Big Ten's Hamlet just-ended routine was part of a dizzying spectre that's been playing out all summer and has now stretched into the fall.
The drama began in late May, when Notre Dame president John Jenkins wrote an opinion piece in the New York Times explaining that Notre Dame would bring students back to campus in mid-August because, even though there were risks involved, higher education made those risks worthwhile. What Jenkins meant to say was, “We're playing football no matter what.”
Notre Dame even took the unprecedented step of agreeing to be part of a conference for a year, forced to do so because the ACC (in which it is a full-fledged member in every sport but football), SEC and Big 12 were all playing conference opponents only (plus one walkover non-conference game).
The fact that the ACC has only one serious national contender in Clemson no doubt softened the blow for Notre Dame.
The Big Ten and Pac-12 presidents, in the meantime. decided
“higher education” wasn't worth the risk and announced there would be no football in the fall in their conferences.
College leaders desperately need games so they can collect their television money. Staging the College Football Playoff, a massive cash cow, is an absolute must. Even If the only teams still standing in December are Notre Dame and three Sun Belt teams, there will be a playoff. That's no different than college basketball, which will hold an NCAA tournament next spring — or, if need be, next summer.
And again, it's all about higher education.
When the Big Ten finally got around to announcing the return of football, its proclamation was full of the usual platitudes, including this remarkable quote from Ohio State head team physician Jim Borchers: “Everyone associated with the Big Ten should be very proud of the groundbreaking steps that are now being taken to better protect the health and safety” of players and communities.
It's remarkable that, five weeks after months of discussion led to a decision that it wasn't safe to play this fall, it is now safe to play. Let's hope the league's new protocols indeed prove to be groundbreaking — for the sake of the players, most of whom are no doubt thrilled to be getting a chance to play. They will be the ones — not the presidents, not the network executives or any of the athletic directors — who will be putting themselves at risk.
I enjoy college football a great deal. To me, fall Saturdays are a lot more fun than fall Sundays, and I sincerely hope positive tests in the coming weeks will be minimal, as will further postponements and cancellations. I hope the presidents in conferences and at schools that have decided to play are making the right decision, and it's a safe one.
But it would be nice if those making the decisions would be honest and say, “Hey, this about the money.”
That's not going to happen.
And football — a.k.a. “higher education” — will march on. Washington Post