Prairie Post (East Edition)

Better ideas are possible with the equalizati­on realizatio­ns

- COURTESY CANADIAN TAXPAYERS FEDERATION

For decades, half of the country has loudly grumbled about Ottawa’s equalizati­on scheme while the other half has remained diligently silent and neither side has done anything. But Saskatchew­an Premier Scott Moe is changing that with a proposal to reform the program.

Premier Moe’s proposal is simple: keep paying out half of the money through equalizati­on’s current formula and pay out the rest as a per-capita transfer to each province.

Let’s compare that to the current scheme.

The federal government will hand out $19 billion to so-called have-not provinces through equalizati­on this year, so each Canadian’s per-capita bill is $516.

That’s where the equality in equalizati­on ends. For example, the Quebec government will collect $11.7 billion from equalizati­on and Manitoba will get $2 billion. Prince Edward Island will get $419 million, making it the biggest per capita winner with the provincial government netting about $2,240 per Islander.

Ontario collects some equalizati­on money, but, after accounting for the per-capita shares of the program’s costs, taxpayers there lose about $449 per Ontarian.

Alberta, British Columbia, Newfoundla­nd and Labrador and Saskatchew­an will get nothing from equalizati­on.

Premier Moe’s proposal would change that.

For example, the Saskatchew­an government would collect $301 million and Ontario’s take would jump by $3.2 billion.

On the other side, Manitoba would lose $674 million and Quebec would lose $3.7 billion.

Premier Moe’s plan has one benefit: taxpayers would have more of their money stay in their own provinces. That’s important for taxpayers from contributi­ng provinces who have been sending $500 each to distant provincial government­s with no accountabi­lity year after year. Those longsuffer­ing taxpayers will appreciate the change.

The math is interestin­g, but the politics in other provinces might give this proposal a chance.

“The program has not worked for Alberta, even during the depths of our recession,” said Alberta Finance Minister Joe Ceci. He promised to review Saskatchew­an’s proposal. Alberta opposition leader Jason Kenney, who has threatened to hold a referendum on equalizati­on, called Saskatchew­an’s plan a “worthwhile discussion.”

More importantl­y, equalizati­on reform could be a lifeline for newly elected Ontario Premier Doug Ford. Ontario got hit with another credit rating downgrade before the new premier could even hang pictures in his office. Premier Moe’s proposal includes 3.2 billion reasons for Premier Ford to get Ontario on board for equalizati­on reform.

Of course, it’s a sure bet the provinces losing money will fight the proposal. But, even within that opposition, there’s a breeze of change. Last November a Quebec politician called on the province chart a new course.

“What I want to tell Quebecers is that a CAQ government will aim for zero equalizati­on,” said François Legault, the leader of the Coalition Avenir Québec party, which leads in the polls for this fall’s provincial election. “A CAQ government will eliminate the wealth gap with the rest of Canada.”

If Quebecers are strengthen­ing their ambition for economic selfsuffic­iency, maybe, just maybe, resistance to reforming equalizati­on will soften.

As with all proposals, Premier Moe’s plan isn’t perfect.

First, it leaves half of a failing program in place.

Second, instead of freeing half of the country entrapped in dependency on equalizati­on, per-capita transfers create a risk of entrapping the other half.

Third, it muddies accountabi­lity with the federal government collecting billions and provincial government­s spending them. It would be better if Ottawa cut equalizati­on in half to cut the GST by one point and the provinces could raise taxes if truly necessary. It’s always better to make the government spending taxpayers’ money responsibl­e for collecting it.

Some will scoff and say it’s impossible to get equalizati­on right and they’re probably correct. But, if perfection is unattainab­le, better is still a benefit. And instead of a deadlock of grumbling and silence, Premier Moe’s concrete proposal is a place where the path to something better can start.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada