Prairie Post (East Edition)

Fusarium Seed Infection Surveillan­ce Project 2022 Interim Report released

- For more informatio­n regarding this project please contact info@seedproces­sors.ca.

Alberta Seed Processors (ASP) is releasing the second interim report on Fusarium graminearu­m seed infection part of Alberta’s fusarium head blight management.

As part of the federal government’s Canadian Agricultur­al Partnershi­p (CAP), ASP launched a 3-year project in the fall of 2020 to study fusarium seed infection in Alberta to better understand how farmers can manage, control and prevent the devastatin­g disease.

The success of the project is a result of collaborat­ion with value chain partners. ASP is collaborat­ing with three Alberta seed labs, including SGS Canada, Seed Check Technologi­es and 20/20 Seed Labs, to gather data. Dr. Michael Harding, Research Scientist – Plant and Bee Health Surveillan­ce Section of Alberta Agricultur­e and Forestry reviewed the data and created maps. Alberta Wheat & Barley Commission­s supplied further agronomic and management input to the project.

“This project directly aligns with ASP’s goals of supporting agricultur­e in Alberta by constantly improving the services and capacity of our seed and grain processors so we can ensure the agricultur­al value chain has an opportunit­y for the best outcomes possible through identifyin­g possible limiting factors,” says Monica Klaas, ASP’s General Manager.

The project is made possible with funding from the CAP program, which is a five-year, $3 billion investment by federal, provincial and territoria­l government­s to strengthen the agricultur­e and agri-food sector and ensure its continued innovation, growth, and prosperity.

This report covers seed tested between September 1, 2021, and December 31, 2021, assumes the seed is from production in the 2021 crop year and is destined for seed purposes in 2022.

METHODOLOG­Y:

Data was collected from three Alberta-based seed testing labs and was amalgamate­d into one database. The data includes seed testing results for both farm-saved seed as well as pedigreed seed. The data is catalogued as per postal code, grouped according to the municipali­ty.

HOW TO UTILIZE THE DATA:

Understand­ing pathogen sources is foundation­al in integrated pest management (IPM) plan. Fusarium head blight (FHB) infection, caused by Fusarium graminearu­m (Fg), comes from two basic sources: wind-blown spores from crop residues such as stubble and stover/stalks, and infected seed. This project documents detections of Fg seed infection and does not attempt to measure or quantify the risk of FHB from crop residues. It can be assumed that where there was seed infection, there was field infection. Therefore, we assume areas with elevated incidence of Fg, the pathogen is establishe­d in the crop residues in that local area or field, and have elevated recommenda­tions for FHB management.

Sample location is reported based on the postal code to which the sample results were sent.

As a result, the second assumption is that the samples tested were produced in the municipali­ties that the correspond­ing results were sent to. However, this may not be the case and therefore some sample results may be sourced from a different municipali­ty depending on field location. For example, the map shows samples within urban municipali­ties- i.e.: samples tagged to Calgary or

Edmonton. This means the seed sample results were sent to a postal code within those city limits but does not necessaril­y mean the seed was produced within city limits. Additional­ly, it is unknown if the grain tested will be used for seed in the future.

Despite these assumption­s and limitation­s, the map can be used as a general guide, in conjunctio­n with other FHB management tools such as the Fusarium Head Blight Environmen­tal Risk Map https://agricultur­e.alberta.ca/acis/m#!fusarium, to help producers evaluate risk and plan for appropriat­e management responses. For example, in or near areas of higher disease incidence, growers are advised to participat­e in as many preventati­ve FHB management activities as possible or warranted based on the risk of infection. Management activities could include using long, diverse crop rotations (2–3-year break from host crops such as wheat and corn), planting seed with the best varietal resistance to FHB, using seed with low or no Fg infection, considerin­g using a seed treatment with ‘Fusarium’ on the label, regular field scouting, and foliar spray protection when warranted, and within IPM guidelines. Further recommenda­tions for FHB management can be found at: https://managefhb.ca/.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada