Prairie Post (East Edition)

Twelve decades of 'Elites Against the People'

- By Lee Harding Lee Harding is a Research Associate for the Frontier Centre for Public Policy.

Democratic capitalism is a remarkably empowering and wealth-generating structure. Although wealth is not a zero-sum game, power may well be. In Chapter 17 of his 2011 book The Fruits of Graft: Great Depression­s Then and Now, Wayne Jett explores how certain elitists have actively sought to undermine the masses and usurp political and economic power for themselves.

In H. G. Wells’ 1901 book Anticipati­ons, Jett finds the elites’ perspectiv­e and plan laid out in stark fashion. Anticipati­ons says that humanity was historical­ly and properly divided into a “superior class” and the “human machinery” of the “working cultivator, peasant, surf or slave.”

The problem was the mechanizat­ion of the Industrial Revolution and “the appearance of great masses of population” enabled “an entire disintegra­tion of that system…. [W]ithout a total destructio­n and rebirth of that fabric, there can never be any return.”

Wells said commoners should never threaten elites because they were a “bulky, irremovabl­e excretion of vicious, helpless and pauper masses… drifting down towards the abyss…inferior in their claim upon the future…[which] cannot be given opportunit­ies or trusted with power…. To give them equality is to sink to their level, to protect and cherish them is to be swamped in their fecundity.”

Anticipati­ons forecast that the “ascendant or dominant nation” would be the one “that most resolutely picks over, educates, sterilizes, exports or poisons its people of the abyss …” He envisioned a time when a new republic “can prevent the birth of just the inadaptabl­e, useless or merely unnecessar­y creatures in each generation.”

This new republic would “hold life to be a privilege,” guiding it with eugenics and imposing death “with little pity and less benevolenc­e.” Instead, “[T]hose swarms of black, and brown, and dirty-white, and yellow people, who do not come into the new needs of efficiency … they will have to go.”

Even book publishing would not be entrusted to “a government of ‘the gray,’” (democracy), but to “intelligen­tly critical men … of the new republic… developing the morality and education system of the future.”

In Anticipati­ons, market competitio­n was denigrated as “the region of the scramble.” True market competitio­n could only threaten the Plutocrats’ economic hegemony, just as true democracy threatened their political power.

“The emergent new republic will be attacking that mass of irresponsi­ble property that is so unavoidabl­e and so threatenin­g under present conditions … [with a] scheme of death duties and heavy graduated taxes upon irresponsi­ble incomes….”

This would severely cripple the upper middle class, while tax-free foundation­s could allow the elites to leverage protected funds to remold the world. In this way, the “competent” elite could “expropriat­e and extinguish incompeten­t rich families”— the wealthy who didn’t share this vision.

“[W]hether violently as a revolution or quietly and slowly, this gray confusion that is democracy must pass away inevitably … into the higher stage … the world-state of the coming years.” Through “elements of technical treason,” the higher class and even leading officials in government­s would join in “a new republic as a sort of outspoken secret society” of “a confluent system of trust-owned business organisms … universiti­es and reorganize­d military and naval services” that mimicked a state.

Did public figures distance themselves from the one who penned such radical ideas? Strangely, no. After Anticipati­ons was published, Wells had a public audience with U.S. President Theodore Roosevelt, whom Wells later called, “the creative will in man” he esteemed.

Before Anticipati­ons, Wells named Woodrow Wilson among the “intelligen­tly critical men of the new republic.” Under Wilson’s presidency (1913-1920), the Federal Reserve Bank, graduated income taxes, and estate taxes were introduced, fulfilling Wells’ vision and making tax-free foundation­s all the more crucial.

In the 1920s, Wells had an affair with Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood who prepared the way for the developmen­t of the birth control pill. Wells called her “the greatest woman in the world; the movement she started will grow to be, a hundred years from now, the most influentia­l of all time in controllin­g man’s destiny on earth.”

Wells also met three times with President Franklin Roosevelt in the 1930s. He found Roosevelt “continuall­y revolution­ary in the new way without ever provoking a stark revolution­ary crisis” and called him “the most effective transmitti­ng instrument possible for the coming of the new world order.”

Wells died in 1946 but the vision he espoused did not. In 1991, the late David Rockefelle­r echoed Wells when he said, “The supranatio­nal sovereignt­y of an intellectu­al elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determinat­ion practiced in past centuries.”

Rockfeller, who died in 2017, was part of three organizati­ons Jett portrayed as carrying on the elites’ vision: the Bilderberg Group, the Council on Foreign Relations, and the Trilateral Commission. Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger fondly eulogized his “friend” Rockefelle­r in the Washington Post upon his passing.

Kissinger mentored his Harvard University pupil Klaus Schwab, who founded the World Economic Forum. Schwab’s Great Reset means we’ll own nothing–while he and his ilk are happy. At that time the “destructio­n and rebirth” Wells envisioned will be complete.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada