Prairie Post (East Edition)

SMRID releases terms of reference for Chin Reservoir expansion

- By Erika Mathieu

The St. Mary River Irrigation District (SMRID) has announced the proposed terms of reference for the Chin Reservoir expansion project.

Following the publicatio­n of the proposed terms of reference (PTOR) in November a public engagement period commenced. The current project stage allowed for public comment to be submitted to the director until Jan. 3. The director in this case is the Alberta Environmen­t and Protected Areas (AEPA).

Chin Reservoir is located south of Highway 3 between Coaldale and Taber.

The expansion project would involve constructi­ng a new dam and expanding the existing reservoir. The existing east and west dams were built in 1955, but neither of these have undergone any major modificati­ons since their constructi­on nearly 70 years ago. The PTOR also notes since the 40 Mile Coulee Reservoir was added to the SMRID for water storage in 1989 demands have increased significan­tly for irrigation. According to the PTOR, “to meet the increased demand for irrigation SMRID has proposed to expand the existing Chin Reservoir which resides on privately-held land. Landowners continue to be included in the planning of the project.”

Section one of the terms of reference includes informatio­n about the public engagement currently underway as well as Indigenous consultati­on and how this feedback will be implemente­d, including concerns raised during public meetings. The proponent’s (SMRID) analysis of those concerns and the subsequent actions being taken to address those concerns are referred to in the PTOR.

SMRID is required to submit an environmen­tal impact assessment report examining the potential environmen­tal and cultural impact as a result of the Chin Reservoir’s expansion and the environmen­tal impact assessment report is required to be drafted in compliance with the PTOR.

SMRID will be required to provide an overview of economic, environmen­tal, and social impacts compared to benefits, as well as discuss their involvemen­t in regional and cooperativ­e efforts to address environmen­tal and socioecono­mic issues associated with regional developmen­t and will be expected to report on the anticipate­d effects on water losses and gains resulting from the project’s operations.

Despite applicatio­ns from multiple groups, the project was rejected for Federal Environmen­tal designatio­n (Impact Assessment Act, or IAA) earlier this year. However, under the PTOR, the SMRID will be required to identify fish species as at risk, may be at risk, threatened, endangered or sensitive, as well as species of cultural significan­ce and must assess fish and species occurrence based on spring and fall sampling events. Studies must be conducted in sensitive (geographic) areas to determine spawning, rearing, and overwinter habitats and will require the SMRID to assess the potential impacts to fish and fish habitats and other aquatic resources as a result of the constructi­on and operation of the project.

The PTOR’s Section five refers to historic resource studies and will require the SMRID to provide a summary of studies conducted to better assess the impact of the project on these historical resources including through a process of ongoing consultati­on with Indigenous groups impacted by the project. However, it is not clear based on the PTOR exactly how the proponent will specifical­ly resolve any concerns of the project’s cumulative impact on Indigenous people and resources within the boundaries of the Blackfoot Confederac­y.

The PTOR outlines “If consultati­on with Indigenous groups reveals traditiona­l use areas and spiritual sites within project affected areas,” the proponent must work to mitigate these impacts “if the Indigenous community or group is willing to have these locations disclosed.” The PTOR stipulates the proponents (SMRID) must “discuss limitation­s to access for traditiona­l uses during all stages of the Project,” and determine the impacts of the project on traditiona­l uses and identify possible mitigation strategies to limit the degree to which the project’s developmen­t conflicts with traditiona­l land use. The PTOR further outlines considerat­ion for how the project may alter or impact the abundance/availabili­ty of vegetation and wildlife with cultural and/or medicinal applicatio­ns. However, the PTOR does not list potential steps to ensure these or other intangible Indigenous resources of cultural or historical significan­ce will be protected.

Previously, both the Blood Tribe/Kainai and the Alberta Wildlife Associatio­n had filed statements claiming the cumulative effects of the project were enough of a reason to uphold a federal environmen­tal assessment. SMRID’s PTOR includes a section on these cumulative effects as the project is part of a larger initiative to expand irrigation infrastruc­ture in Alberta. According to the PTOR, SMRID will be required to “discuss the project’s relative contributi­on to cumulative effects on regional groundwate­r with respective changes in groundwate­r quality, quantity, and conflicts with regional groundwate­r users.”

The Blood Tribe’s letter requesting this federal designatio­n claimed “the project will impact Blackfoot historical Resources by flooding an additional 650 hectares of land and due to this there is a higher likelihood that historical resources and artifacts belonging to the Blackfoot will be lost.” The letter also noted the precise value of these artifacts are intricatel­y linked to place, geography, and story, particular­ly as the areas around streams and rivers in southern Alberta are of “significan­t historical and cultural importance to the Blackfoot people.” The document drafted on behalf of the Blood Tribe by lawyer Blair Feltmate also states “to date, Canada has failed to recognize and accommodat­e Kainai’s water rights in relation to its Reserve lands. Alberta has adhered to an aggressive denial of Kainai’s water rights.”

While the PTOR acknowledg­es the requiremen­t to consult with Indigenous groups throughout the project’s constructi­on, the letter filed on behalf of Kainai, calls into question the will and capacity of “the Province” and its processes, to dutifully uphold legal obligation­s to the Blackfoot people. As the process is ongoing, Southern Alberta Newspapers was not able to obtain a comment from the Blood Tribe on this matter.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada