Why are Alberta farmers reluctant to use carbon credits that can potentially help lower emissions? New School of Public Policy report
As the province with the most beef cattle, the second-largest number of farms and farmed area in the country, and as one of Canada’s biggest producers of crops, Alberta is a huge part of the national agriculture sector. It has also been responsible for the highest level of agricultural greenhouse-gas emissions in the country.
However, there has been little exploration to date of the effectiveness of using carbon credits to encourage Alberta farmers to practise farming techniques that lower emissions, while earning extra revenue without jeopardizing their agricultural output.
Today, the School of Public Policy with authors Nimanthika Lokuge and Sven Anders, released a report that provides a comprehensive review highlighting the gaps in existing knowledge related to agricultural carbon credits/offsets with particular interest on Alberta. The report also examines farmer’s reluctance to participate and what Alberta policy-makers can do to change that.
According to the authors, “Participating in a carbon-credit system allows farmers to generate credits for reducing emissions; they can then sell those credits for cash on a credit market to emitters who need to purchase carbon-offset allowances for exceeding their mandated emission limits. Despite there being an active carbon-offset market in Alberta, however, farmers in the province hardly participate. This appears partly due to a history of regulatory risk: the agriculture sector has seen the revocation of carboncredit eligibility for certain practices, and invalidated credits can lead to significant financial losses for farmers. Farmers are also reluctant to participate due to the inadequacy of offset credit revenues in covering the foregone costs of implementing emission-reduction practices given current carbon-offset prices and the emissions level per farm.”
Some lower-emission farming protocols have proved profitable for farmers by improving efficiency, even without carbon-offset incentives. While farmers may adopt these practices for their own reasons, they are reluctant to participate in Alberta’s carbon-offset market unless they are sufficiently rewarded. Market conditions thus far have not encouraged them to do so. Alberta farmers may continue to largely sit out the carbon-credit market until returns for earning credits become more stable and more rewarding. Alberta policy-makers should emphasize the intrinsic efficiency benefits to farmers of implementing these protocols for their own sake. Convincing farmers in the province to invest in emission-reducing technologies for the purpose of making money in the current Alberta carbon market will, for the time being, remain a difficult sell.