Prairie Post (West Edition)

The role of RCMP in Alberta needs to be deeply examined

- BY RICHARD B. FADDEN, O.C. Dick Fadden is a resident of Ottawa and a retired public servant, He was formerly the Director of the Canadian Security Intelligen­ce Service and National Security Advisor to the Prime Minister.

Since its creation, the RCMP has been an icon — sometime shining, sometime tarnished. But the objective here is not to review the Force’s past but rather to look to its future role and mandate by asking if the way policing is currently set up in Canada is in the national interest.

So, in looking at the future role of the RCMP, we should consider both the interests of the Federal government and of the provinces and territorie­s. The RCMP is charged with providing three baskets of services: federal policing, provincial/ territoria­l and municipal policing in eight provinces and three territorie­s and a range of technical services available to all police forces in Canada.

This has been the case for some decades now and the key issue is whether this arrangemen­t suits the policing requiremen­ts for Canada for the future.

I do not believe this to be the case and suggest that what today is required of the Force is beyond its capacity to effectivel­y deliver. Delivery of the three baskets of services is immeasurab­ly more complex than it was a few decades ago and it is unreasonab­le to ask one organizati­on to do it all. Two other issues are relevant. The first arises from the fact that the contracts between the Federal Government and the provinces bind the Force to provide those services while Federal policing imposes no such obligation on the Force.

The practical result is a strong tendency on the part of the RCMP to empathize provincial policing to the detriment of federal policing. Supporters of the current arrangemen­t argue that the ability of the Force to shift resources in emergencie­s should trump other considerat­ions. This may once have been true but it is no longer so.

For example, shortly after 9/11, the Force shifted a significan­t number of personnel from contract policing to federal policing to deal with the new terrorist threat. To state the obvious, policing Red Deer is materially different then dealing with internatio­nal terrorism.

It is unfair to individual officers to ask them to work in areas for which they are not trained and it is definitive­ly not in the national interest! This argument applies across the board to all elements of federal policing and the same is true of contract policing which is as complex an undertakin­g as federal policing — just very different!

The above issues all point to the need for contract provinces and the Federal government to reconsider the RCMP’s role in provincial policing both to allow for provinces to provide for their policing needs and to allow a reconstitu­ted RCMP to focus on the ever-growing requiremen­ts of federal policing.

This change will in no way affect the absolute requiremen­t in modern policing for all forces to cooperate and, as appropriat­e, share technical, personnel and financial resources. It works for Ontario and Quebec and there is no reason to believe that it cannot work in Alberta and elsewhere. It is in the national interest that it be made to work before the national icon that is the RCMP is put at ever greater risk of tarnishing.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada