Regina Leader-Post

Young deserves to be heard

- BRUCE JOHNSTONE

Let’s be clear on one thing. Neil Young doesn’t know what he’s talking about when it comes to oilsands developmen­t in Canada.

The source? None other than the man himself. “As far as me not knowing what I am talking about, everyone knows that that’s obvious,” he told a news conference in Winnipeg.

For example, Young recently compared the oilsands developmen­t around Fort McMurray to Hiroshima after the atom bomb levelled the city in 1945. Young also said oilsands developmen­t will turn Alberta into a “moonscape,” that bitumen produced in northern Alberta is going to China via the Keystone XL pipeline (actually, it’s going to U.S. refineries), that oilsands emit the same amount of carbon as all the cars and trucks in Canada (it’s actually half that).

Predictabl­y, Young’s comments have unleashed a firestorm of reaction, from the PMO, Premier Brad Wall, Canadian Associatio­n of Petroleum Producers and CEOs of some of the biggest oil companies in the country, who called his remarks “insulting,” “arrogant” and “ignorant.’’

Young has been blasted for being a hypocrite (for consuming more than his fair share of fossil fuels, while condemning the oil industry in the same breath) and an “ignoramus’’ by politician­s, business leaders and commentato­rs alike.

So why should Canadians listen to the 68-year-old rock star, who was in Regina Friday on his Honour the Treaties tour to help raise money for the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation (ACFN), about 225 km north of Fort McMurray?

“My job is to bring light to the situation through my celebrity. Aside from that, I am not nearly as qualified to speak as these other folks are,” said Young, referring to members of the ACFN, who are launching a lawsuit to overturn federal cabinet approval of Shell Canada’s Jackpine mine.

In other words, Young is not pretending to be an expert on oilsands developmen­t, or even an environmen­talist. By his own admission, he’s using his status as one of Canada’s biggest rock ’n roll legends to draw attention to the plight of First Nations living downstream from Shell’s mammoth Jackpine project.

So what’s Young’s campaign really all about? It’s about stopping the 100,000-barrel-a-day expansion of Shell’s 255,000-barrela-day Athabasca Oil Sands project, about 70 km north of Fort McMurray, which was approved by the federal cabinet in December.

That despite a report by a federal-provincial review panel that warned of “significan­t adverse environmen­tal effects’’ on wetlands downstream from the project and “lack of proposed mitigation measures.’’

Specifical­ly, the panel warned of “irreversib­le environmen­tal damage,’’ including the loss of thousands of hectares of wetlands, harm to migratory birds, caribou and other plant and animal species, some of which are “at risk.”

Even Environmen­t Minister Leona Aglukkak conceded the project would cause “significan­t adverse environmen­tal effects,” but that cabinet decided the project was “justified in the circumstan­ces.’’

The ACFN lawsuit claims the Harper government broke three federal statutes in approving the project — the Canadian Environmen­tal Assessment Act, the Species At Risk Act and the Migratory Birds Convention Act — as well as several internatio­nal agreements. The band also contends the government violated its own constituti­onal duty to consult First Nations, ignored most of the band’s recommenda­tions and approved the project before the 35-day extension to the consultati­on period had expired.

Regardless of the outcome of the ACFN lawsuit, the issue boils to one of trust. Can the Harper government, which has been a vociferous booster of Canada’s energy industry, especially oilsands developmen­t and pipeline projects, be trusted to live up to its own environmen­tal rules and regulation­s?

Based on the government’s track record, the Athabasca Chipewyan First Nation have justifiabl­e cause for concern.

And there’s the bigger issue of oilsands developmen­t. Oilsands are our fast-growing source of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and are the main reason Canada’s GHG emissions are expected to rise significan­tly by 2020.

A federal report released last year showed the government is way off track on its commitment to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 17 per cent from 2005 levels by 2020, with increasing GHG emissions from the oilsands largely to blame.

Anyone who thinks that’s not a problem is just hiding his or her head in the oilsands. Even a rock star knows that.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada