Regina Leader-Post

TANK MOVIE FURY RUNS ON EMPTY.

- KATHERINE MONK

The horror. The horror. You can’t have a credible war movie without conjuring a little bit of Marlon Brando’s ghost as Col. Kurtz uttering the dark heart of human truth.

We are beasts. And in the perpetual apocalypse that is now, accessing the monster within seems to get easier and more socially acceptable. Witness the moral carnage that is the Kardashian­s or the ambient blood and gore on cable television and the once black-and-white line between ordinary decency and the grotesquel­y depraved goes all grey.

Yet we still exhibit a hopeful desire to recalibrat­e the moral GPS because a movie such as Fury is asking tougher questions than its marketing poster with Brad Pitt in army fatigues might suggest. A Second World War movie that begins during the final weeks of combat in Europe, Fury introduces us to an intrepid — if somewhat scurrilous — crew of soldiers in a Sherman tank they nickname Fury. They are headed by Wardaddy (Pitt), a scarred survivor who promised he would do his best to keep his boys alive. They are grateful for his skills in battle, but their respect is tainted by fear because Wardaddy has a darker side — and so do they.

The only innocent is Norman (Logan Lerman), a kid plucked from the steno pool to become a gunner. At first, he just doesn’t have the stomach for it. He resists when Wardaddy asks him to open fire and shoot other humans. But eventually, in the scorching, blood-soaked heat of combat, he warps. And it’s here, in this internal war zone, that most of David Ayer’s movie is stationed.

Opting for a cross between long, moody quiet moments and a clear desire to be a tank version of Das Boot, Ayer keeps his drama contained inside the tank so he can maximize the personal dynamics and show us the different shades of moral grey. In the same stroke, he essentiall­y removes the external enemy.

Unlike those early movies that taught an entire postwar generation how to hero-talk like John Wayne and fight like Jimmy Cagney, Fury does not feature scenes with screaming, unrepentan­t German officers assuring us of their evil. It shows us soldiers struggling to deal with the reality of war, which is killing others and watching your own die around you.

We have to feel this horror in our guts, so Norman is assigned the role of audience touchstone and gives us a righteous platform to keep our feet out of the mud. But his slide is inevitable and provides the secondary stage of Ayer’s movie as the tank burrows ever deeper into German territory and ever deeper into the dark heart of Fury’s occupants.

Ayer wants us to get to the next level. He wants us to question the whole notion of nobility in war because just about everything the men do is unspeakabl­e and completely unredeemab­le.

Ayer seems to have a knack for these kinds of characters. As the screenwrit­er behind The Fast and the Furious as well as Training Day, he understand­s how to exploit Hollywood expectatio­n for his own ends. But Fury doesn’t fire on every cylinder. The movie drags and sometimes feels shapeless and there’s a whole lot of Bible talk that’s supposed to nod to our current reality and the ridiculous idea that God could be on anyone’s side in war. But for the most part this dialogue is empty and feels random — like getting a Bible lesson from someone who never read the Bible.

Then again, that could be the point: The boys in the sardine can are making it up as they go along, trying to stay alive another day, knowing the road back to redemption may be a bridge too far.

 ?? GILES KEYTE/ Sony Pictures Entertainm­ent ?? Fury asks tougher questions than the sight of Brad Pitt in army fatigues might
suggest.
GILES KEYTE/ Sony Pictures Entertainm­ent Fury asks tougher questions than the sight of Brad Pitt in army fatigues might suggest.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada