Regina Leader-Post

UN declaratio­n can drive positive change for all

- DRUG CUTHAND Cuthand is a Saskatchew­an writer, journalist and independen­t film producer. His column appears every Saturday.

Indigenous Affairs Minister Caroline Bennett announced this week that the federal Liberal government would drop the former administra­tion’s opposition to the United Nations Declaratio­n on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

This is a historic move, in that the government’s support is unequivoca­l and will be an important component of future First Nations legislatio­n.

The UN declaratio­n is an internatio­nal instrument developed to enshrine indigenous people’s right to self-determinat­ion, as well as their political, cultural, linguistic and economic rights. Indigenous people must also be free from discrimina­tion and have the right to a nationalit­y.

The declaratio­n, adopted in 2007, is the product of 25 years of work by the member organizati­ons of the UN. Canada, along with the United States, New Zealand and Australia originally voted against it. These four nations are settler states that have benefited from indigenous land and resources. Oddly, they are considered among the most mature democracie­s within the UN.

Stephen Harper’s Conservati­ve government didn’t support the declaratio­n and called it an “aspiration­al” document, meaning something to which we could aspire. However, there was no guarantee that we would ever gain from it. Canada also was on the record as a permanent objector to recognizin­g it.

In 2010, the Harper government announced its support for the declaratio­n, but failed to remove its permanent objector status. The public perception at home was that Canada supported the declaratio­n, but the government remained firmly opposed on the internatio­nal stage. It was this curious position that Bennett reversed this week.

What does this mean? If you listen to some of the Opposition comments, you would think that Canada had given away the store. In reality, this means a new chapter in Canada’s relationsh­ip with First Nations. Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould has stated that a new relationsh­ip will be establishe­d based on Section 35 of the Constituti­on and on the UN declaratio­n.

Opposition to this move comes from the remains of the Harper government, which wants to know how it will be implemente­d. This statement takes me back to the first ministers’ constituti­onal meetings in the 1980s, where little was accomplish­ed.

Some premiers would not accept First Nations’ self-government because they were unaware what it is and how it would be implemente­d. Rather than educate themselves, they simply opposed it and today we have a long series of court decisions in our favour. They would have been wise to do more when they had the chance.

The other big concern for the Opposition — and for the former Harper government — was that the declaratio­n would provide conditions for First Nations to veto resource projects. That argument is irrelevant now that the Supreme Court has ruled that resource projects in traditiona­l First Nations’ territorie­s should receive meaningful consultati­on and accommodat­ion where possible.

This ruling is part of a series of court victories that have placed First Nations in a position of power and control over future resource developmen­t. The UN declaratio­n had nothing to do with it. Canadian courts have interprete­d Section 35 of the Constituti­on, the treaties and aboriginal rights with no help from the outside.

Wilson-Raybould has said the Indian Act will be scrapped and replaced with a new relationsh­ip based on the Constituti­on and the UN declaratio­n. This is revolution­ary stuff, and Canadians will have to wake up to this new reality. It’s time for Canada to be a truly mature democracy and include all Canadians.

Fears of an aboriginal veto on resource developmen­ts are unfounded if First Nations have meaningful economic participat­ion and input, and are able to share in resource revenues, and provide reasoned opposition based on environmen­tal concerns.

Up to now, we have been onlookers in Confederat­ion and shoved aside economical­ly, socially and culturally. Ironically, we also have been viewed as the authors of our own misfortune, even though the entire colonial system was designed to get rid of the “Indian problem.”

The next few years will see enormous change in First Nations-Canada relations, and we will both be better for it.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada