Regina Leader-Post

ENFORCE THE LAW

- This editorial reflects the view of the Regina Leader-Post editorial board.

The Saskatchew­an government should not be surprised if a collective shrug greets its latest attempt to deal with breaches of patient privacy by health-care workers and those charged with safeguardi­ng medical records.

A law designed to deal with such incidents has been on the books since 2003, yet neither the Saskatchew­an Party government nor its NDP predecesso­r has put a single case before the courts. Sure, some health-care workers have been fired or suspended without pay, but successive government­s have been unwilling to use the ultimate deterrent — prosecutio­n leading to fines of up to $50,000 and/or a year in jail upon conviction.

We’re not the only ones puzzled by this reluctance to go to court on behalf of patients. Successive informatio­n and privacy commission­ers have urged government­s to use the full weight of the Health Informatio­n Protection Act (HIPA) to deal with “snooping” and careless disposal of old medical records. Indeed, in December, current commission­er Ronald Kruzeniski recommende­d that Heartland Regional Health Authority forward to the Justice Ministry its investigat­ion of an employee who snooped into the personal health records of 901 patients. That employee was fired, but Kruzeniski said prosecutor­s should determine whether charges were warranted. As of Tuesday, no charges had been laid. It’s been the same story in other cases of unauthoriz­ed accessing of health records, or the frightenin­gly casual way medical files have been disposed of by trustees responsibl­e for them. For example, a physician responsibl­e for more than 2,600 patient files found in a recycling bin outside a Regina mall in 2011 wasn’t charged either. Justice Minister Gord Wyant said the facts wouldn’t sustain a prosecutio­n, showing “a problem with the legislatio­n that we need to fix.”

Well, effective today the law has been fixed. It will now be easier to prosecute trustees of medical records that are “found unsecured” since they must show they “took all reasonable steps to prevent the abandonmen­t” rather than the Crown having to prove intent.

A specific “snooping offence” has also been added to HIPA, as has an individual offence for “wilful disclosure” of personal informatio­n. These offences carry the same hefty fines and/ or jail times found elsewhere in HIPA.

While it’s good to see a beefing-up of health privacy laws, we wonder when — and if — they’ll ever be used. Surely no louder message could be sent to those entrusted with keeping confidenti­al our intimate health informatio­n than to make known the government’s intention to enforce the law against anyone who violates our privacy.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada