Regina Leader-Post

Is exercise about length or frequency?

- JILL BARKER

When it comes to exercise frequency, the rule of thumb is to perform some form of aerobic exercise most, if not all, days of the week. While there’s plenty of debate about how long each bout of exercise should be, 10 to 30 minutes of sustained physical activity (depending on intensity) is usually considered sufficient.

Ask the same question about weight training, and the answer isn’t as simple. The American College of Sports Medicine suggests a minimum of two strength workouts a week, with the acknowledg­ment that more are likely needed if the goal is to improve muscle size and strength. The recommenda­tion leaves plenty of room to experiment with training frequency, but individual­s are further advised to allow muscles

48 hours to recover before heading back to the weight room. Too fast a return jeopardize­s results, say the experts.

But like any exercise-related recommenda­tion, there’s science and then there’s practice, with plenty of gym rats and personal trainers recommendi­ng hitting the weight room most, if not all, days of the week.

Keep in mind that in cardiovasc­ular conditioni­ng, the primary muscle being trained is the heart. In the weight room, however, discussion­s about frequency revolve around how many times a week a given muscle or set of muscles should be trained. There are plenty of bodybuilde­rs who hit the gym daily, but will tell you that they train most muscles a maximum of once a week, focusing on a high number of repetition­s per session. Then there are those who recommend doing fewer repetition­s more often, with six-day-a-week cycles not uncommon.

If you review some of the scientific literature concerning exercise frequency for optimal gains in muscle size, you’ll get a whole host of results — but unless other variables (like the amount of weight lifted and the number of repetition­s) are standardiz­ed, it’s hard to compare one set of results to the next.

In an attempt to add clarity, a team of American and Australian researcher­s reviewed the results of several studies not only by the number of times an individual hit the weight room per week, but also by the number of repetition­s performed per muscle group per week.

What they found is that when it comes to improving muscle size, frequency wasn’t an important indicator of success. High- and low-frequency training schedules resulted in similar increases in muscle size, provided the total number of reps performed over the course of the week was similar.

The studies included trained and untrained men and women and compared a variety of workout frequencie­s ranging from once to six times a week. Most of the data was based on two to three sets of eight to 12 reps per muscle group, which is considered a standard weight training protocol.

The conclusion that total volume is a more important measure of muscle gains than frequency held true whether training the smaller muscles of the upper body or the larger muscles of the lower body. It also held true whether the individual­s were exercise novices or veterans.

The researcher­s compiled all the study subjects and results into a single bank of data, gathered from 800 individual­s.

What’s also interestin­g about this study is that it suggests 48 hours between workouts may not be necessary for muscle growth, at least among weight room veterans.

That said, the researcher­s also pointed out that there’s a wide variety of individual­ized responses to training frequency and volume, so you shouldn’t be surprised if your results don’t match those reported in the studies.

But that’s not the most important take-home message — once again, science has proven that there’s a fair amount of wiggle room in traditiona­l exercise prescripti­ons, be it cardio or weight training.

It’s also important to remember that variables such as volume, frequency and intensity need to be looked at as a whole, not a series of parts — adjustment­s to one can frequently be offset by adjustment­s to another. More volume and less frequency will likely offer similar results to less volume and more frequency.

So if you can only make it to the gym once or twice a week, you should consider longer workouts than someone who hits the gym more often.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? For some weight room veterans, waiting at least 48 hours between workouts may not be necessary for muscle growth.
GETTY IMAGES For some weight room veterans, waiting at least 48 hours between workouts may not be necessary for muscle growth.
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada