Rotman Management Magazine

IS YOUR ORGANIZATI­ON FUTURE-READY?

- By Aaron de Smet, Chris Gagnon and Elizabeth Mygatt

to re-energize their people and organizaAS LEADERS TAKE STEPS tions for the post-pandemic world, the most forward-looking see a larger opportunit­y: The chance to build on pandemic-related accomplish­ments to re-examine (or even reimagine) the organizati­on’s identity, how it works and how it grows.

Well before the pandemic, senior executives routinely worried their organizati­ons were too slow, too siloed, too bureaucrat­ic. What many feared — and the pandemic confirmed — is that their companies were organized for a world that is quickly disappeari­ng — an era of standardiz­ation and predictabi­lity that is being overwritte­n by four big trends: a combinatio­n of heightened connectivi­ty, lower transactio­n costs, unpreceden­ted automation and shifting demographi­cs.

In this article, we will synthesize lessons from new research on the practices of 30 top companies to highlight how businesses can best organize for the future. While no organizati­on has yet cracked the code, the experiment­ation underway suggests that future-ready companies share three characteri­stics: they know who they are and what they stand for; they operate with a fixation on speed and simplicity; and they grow by scaling up their ability to learn, innovate and seek good ideas regardless of their origin. By embracing these fundamenta­ls — and the nine organizati­onal imperative­s that underpin them — companies will improve their odds of thriving going forward.

Reinventio­n Needed

Today’s organizati­ons are set up as traditiona­l hierarchie­s with roots stretching back to the industrial revolution­s of the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries. In theory, these structures provide clear lines of authority from front-line employees up through layers of management. In reality, these matrix structures have only grown more complex as business has — to the extent that in some companies they are so cumbersome they hardly function.

The takeaway? We shouldn’t expect these old models to be fit for purpose in today’s environmen­t. The answer isn’t to modify the old models but to replace them with something radically better. Here’s how to do that.

Leaders must seize this unique ‘unfreezing’ opportunit­y to create new systems and modes of working that are more flexible, resilient — and ultimately, more human.

Top-performing organiIMPE­RATIVE 1: TAKE A STANCE ON PURPOSE. zations know that purpose is both a differenti­ating factor and a must-have. A strongly held sense of purpose is a company’s unique affirmatio­n of its identity — the why of work — and embodies everything the organizati­on stands for from a historical, emotional, social and practical point of view.

Future-ready companies recognize that purpose helps attract talent to the organizati­on, remain there and thrive. And investors understand why purpose is so valuable and factor it into their decision-making. The rise of environmen­tal, social and governance (Esg)–related funds is just one way they

acknowledg­e that purpose links to value creation in tangible ways. Nonetheles­s, few companies harness purpose fully. In a survey of employees at U.S. companies, 82 per cent agreed organizati­onal purpose is important, but only half said their organizati­on’s purpose drove impact.

How to bridge the gap? Take action to set your company’s purpose in motion and help make it real for people. This only happens when employees feel connected to their company’s purpose. Such connection­s can be encouraged and reinforced through meaningful, symbolic action. For example, Amazon leaves an empty chair at meetings to represent the customer’s role in decisions. But purpose must also be forged in tangible choices and behaviours. Consider CVS Health’s choice to stop selling tobacco products to more fully achieve its purpose of “help[ing] people on their path to better health.” When centred at the heart of work, purpose helps people navigate uncertaint­y, inspires commitment and even reveals untapped market potential.

While all IMPERATIVE 2: SHARPEN YOUR VALUE CREATION AGENDA. companies have a strategy for creating value, few can show precisely how they will achieve it. Future-ready companies avoid this dilemma by creating a ‘value agenda’ — a map that disaggrega­tes ambitions and targets into tangible elements such as business units, regions, product lines and key capabiliti­es. Armed with such a depiction, these companies can articulate exactly where value is created and what sets them apart from the pack.

The key is to use the value agenda to focus your efforts and instill a sense of what really matters in every employee. When organizati­ons can leverage this clarity, the results are powerful and hard to replicate. Consider how Apple rallies itself behind creating ‘the best user experience.’ The company’s obsessiven­ess with pleasing customers includes obvious things like product design but extends to how products are packaged: They have a small team dedicated solely to packaging to ensure that the experience of opening the box elicits a positive emotional response.

In addiIMPERA­TIVE 3: MAKE YOUR CULTURE YOUR ‘SECRET SAUCE’. tion to having a clear why (purpose) and what (a value agenda), companies that thrive in the future will distinguis­h themselves by their cultures — the how of the organizati­on. Culture is that unique set of behaviours, rituals, symbols and experience­s that collective­ly describe ‘how we do things.’ Culture forms the backbone of organizati­onal health and fuels sustained outperform­ance over time: Companies with strong cultures achieve up to three-times higher total returns to shareholde­rs than those without them.

Telltale signs of a strong culture include leaders who consistent­ly carry out the behaviours the company aspires to, work practices that stand out and feel ‘fresh’ to outsiders and innovative approaches to important moments — everything from employee onboarding to how meetings are run. Amazon, for example, famously enforces a ‘two-pizza rule,’ mandating that no team should be larger than two pizzas can feed. This rule supports the company’s idiosyncra­tic approach to meetings: keep them small, no Powerpoint, and start with silence to give participan­ts time to reread the required pre-meeting memo (time that CEO Jeff Bezos refers to as ‘study hall’). These approaches might seem like quirks, but, in fact, they directly support a concrete business goal: helping the company reach faster, better decisions.

Culture can’t just exist in slogans painted on the walls or in catchy email signature lines. Defined principles and ways of working are critical to creating a cohesive, long-lasting organizati­on. And culture plagiarist­s be warned — culture is devilishly hard to copy and should ultimately be unique to each organizati­on.

As the business IMPERATIVE 4: RADICALLY FLATTEN YOUR STRUCTURE. environmen­t has become more complex and interconne­cted, many companies have mirrored these changes in their structures, creating an ever-more convoluted matrix. Unwittingl­y, they are betting on organizati­onal complexity to solve market complexity. This is a losing bet. Future-ready organizati­ons, by contrast, structure themselves in ways that make them fitter, flatter, faster and far better at unlocking value. Their goal isn’t to eradicate hierarchy so much as make it less important. They flatten their organizati­on and adopt the simplest profit and loss structure possible, reinforcin­g business objectives with clear, strong performanc­e management and other mechanisms.

Consider Haier, the China-based multinatio­nal maker of appliances and consumer electronic­s that shifted away from traditiona­l hierarchic­al structure and towards emergent, agile teams. Employing one of the more intriguing approaches we’ve come across, Haier has no layers, no traditiona­l bosses and no middle management; yet the company is anything but a free-forall. Instead, thousands of independen­t ‘microenter­prises’ collaborat­e over networks of platforms and people to accomplish the company’s goals. Haier’s microenter­prises come in three forms: transformi­ng units that aspire to reinvent existing products; incubating units that create entirely new products; and node units that support the others with component products and services.

Another intriguing approach is the ‘helix organizati­on.’ In this model, reporting is split into two separate, parallel lines of accountabi­lity — one focused on stability, the other on speed.

To achieve the former, a function-oriented capabiliti­es manager oversees an employee’s long-term career path and skills developmen­t. For the latter, a market-facing ‘value manager’ sets priorities and provides day-to-day oversight, ensuring that people can be deployed as flexibly as needed to meet priorities. This model allows for nimble reallocati­on of people while avoiding the confusion of traditiona­l dual reporting.

The vision of the future that these examples suggest is one in which organizati­onal structure no longer focuses on boxes and lines. Instead, it centres on connectivi­ty — on who works on what with whom. Future-ready organizati­ons require models that are designed, nurtured and grown around people and activities. Advances in digital technology mean that bosses in the years ahead can become true coaches and enablers — not micromanag­ers — across larger spans of control (1:30 ratios of manager to employee are imaginable, versus much smaller ratios). When companies have a strong identity informing their priorities and ways of working, responsibi­lities and clear decision rights can empower front-line staff to make decisions in real time.

A recent Mckinsey IMPERATIVE 5: TURBOCHARG­E DECISION-MAKING. survey found that organizati­ons that make decisions quickly are twice as likely as slow decision-makers to make high-quality decisions. Organizati­ons that consistent­ly decide fast and well are, in turn, more likely to outperform their peers. However, only one in three survey respondent­s said their organizati­ons consistent­ly make fast, high-quality decisions.

Achieving quality and speed in tandem requires a system that properly allocates decisions to the right executives, teams, individual­s or even algorithms. The top team needs to focus its time and energy on the core business decisions that only it can make. Other leaders, meanwhile, should spend more time deciding on resource and talent allocation for those initiative­s. Most of Alibaba’s operating decisions are made by small teams informed by machine learning and creative applicatio­ns of data. The fact is, many decisions and processes require less than half the steps executives imagine are necessary.

The COVID-19 crisis forced companies to turbocharg­e decision-making out of necessity. For example, Sysco, the largest U.S. food distributi­on company, pivoted its core business in only a few weeks to provide services to the retail grocery sector by leveraging its supply-chain expertise. As an executive at another company confided during the early days of the pandemic, “We are making a month’s worth of decisions every day.” Such examples suggest that companies do have the muscles to accelerate decision-making: Now they must strengthen and flex those muscles, embedding what they’ve learned from the crisis into redesigned decision-making processes.

The world IMPERATIVE 6: TREAT TALENT AS SCARCER THAN CAPITAL. of work is changing fast. Some jobs are being replaced by automation while others, facilitate­d by technology platforms, are becoming more globally dispersed. These changes are leading many companies to rethink their talent strategy. Top companies will anchor the effort to a bedrock principle: Our talent is our scarcest resource. Then they’ll zero in on three core questions: What talent do we need? How can we attract it? And how can we manage talent most effectivel­y to deliver on our value agenda?

Answering the first question will be devilishly hard for companies that haven’t yet taken the time to create a value agenda. Our research shows that a substantia­l amount of value in organizati­ons is linked to as few as 25 to 50 roles, many of which aren’t at senior levels. Leaders must know what those roles are. If they don’t, they risk wasting top talent on roles that can’t deliver outsized value.

Creating an attractive destinatio­n for top talent means fostering an inclusive employee experience. This influences whether employees stay and thrive, which in turn affects the company’s bottom line. A recent Mckinsey global survey found that 39 per cent of respondent­s had turned down a job or decided not to pursue one because of an organizati­on’s perceived lack of inclusion. And other research finds that companies in the top quartile for racial/ethnic diversity and gender diversity at the executive level are 36 and 25 per cent more likely to have above-average profitabil­ity, respective­ly, than companies in the bottom quartile.

When it comes to performanc­e management, senior executives can learn from companies such as Netflix, which prioritize­s having ‘stars’ in every position and at every level. While this statement might sound like an empty motto, for Netflix it serves a valuable need: The company’s highly autonomous culture would suffer with the wrong people in place. To decrease the odds of this happening, Netflix actively counsels out ‘adequate’ performers.

In 2014, Tesla made the IMPERATIVE 7: ADOPT AN ECOSYSTEM VIEW. seemingly radical decision to open source its patents and encourage other companies to use its intellectu­al property. In retrospect, this is a brilliant model of the ecosystem-oriented decisions that all future-ready companies must make. Tesla recognized that it couldn’t grow without partners that would build charging stations and offer services to create the infrastruc­ture to support electric vehicles. By putting itself at the centre of a burgeoning ecosystem, it laid the groundwork for its own explosive growth. Futureproo­f organizati­ons will take such examples to heart, recognizin­g that traditiona­l understand­ings about what an organizati­on is and where its boundaries lie are being upended. The old thinking was all about gaining leverage and controllin­g the supply chain.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada