Saskatoon StarPhoenix

Cities must lead on climate fight

- The editorials that appear in this space represent the opinion of The StarPhoeni­x. They are unsigned because they do not necessaril­y represent the personal views of the writers. The positions taken in the editorials are arrived at through discussion among

The flood waters from southern Alberta have already subsided from Saskatoon’s iconic river, but that doesn’t mean the impact of these storms won’t still be felt.

While it will be months before the total cost of the damage to such places as Calgary, Canmore, High River, and the Siksika and Morley First Nations will be known, estimates already top out at more than $5 billion for the disaster.

Much of that damage is uninsurabl­e, meaning the lion’s share will be picked up by federal disaster programs. And even some of the uninsurabl­e damage is likely to be covered by insurance companies, who are reeling from the public relations problem of telling homeowners they aren’t covered.

According to the Globe and Mail, insurance companies are backing down from threats they wouldn’t pay out anything in flooded areas even if there is evidence of sewage backup — which is insured — if it happened to coincide with surface flooding, which isn’t covered. A campaign of “naming and shaming” companies such as TD Insurance, RBC Insurance Services and Alberta Motor Associatio­n (AMA) Insurance, was having an impact.

The companies were worried about the loss of future business, given that earning a reputation for not paying out claims deters people from buying insurance in the first place. But, as National Bank Financial analyst Peter Routledge notes, the decision to pick up the tab for uninsurabl­e damage could end up spreading the cost to other customers through higher premiums.

“One way or another we are going to pay for this ... through increased municipal taxes and insurance rates,” says former Calgary councillor Bob Hawkeswort­h. “And eventually, the cost of inaction is going to be greater than the cost of action.”

Mr. Hawkeswort­h wants to put in place a carbon tax to raise money to cover extreme weather events. He suggests this is the proper place to raise the money since, according to climate scientists, it is the increase in carbon in the atmosphere that is contributi­ng to the increased occurrence of extreme weather events.

The former councillor isn’t alone in suggesting that such events require forethough­t. Former Toronto mayor David Miller says government­s must do more to prepare for these once-rare weather events. Toronto, which is now locked in a heat wave, also got hit with an unusual flood this summer.

But Mr. Miller points out that, of all levels of government­s that have a say over such preparatio­ns, it is municipali­ties that have most at stake and that also contribute most to the problem. According to a group representi­ng the world’s largest cities committed to fighting climate change, most greenhouse gas emissions can be traced to cities, Mr. Miller says.

While this year’s flooding will cost Calgary some $300 million to $400 million, municipali­ties can mitigate these costs by changing building standards, incorporat­ing natural flood controls into building codes and regulation­s, and taking active steps to reduce emissions.

The Alberta government has committed to changing regulation­s to discourage people from building in flood-prone areas. But this is a battle for the long-term, and leadership can’t wane once the flood waters subside.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada