Saskatoon StarPhoenix

Advocate ‘not overly optimistic’

- ANDREA HILL

A whitewater park for kayakers, surfers and other water sport enthusiast­s is unlikely to open near the Saskatoon weir any time soon, even if a hydroelect­ric project is developed in the area.

“We’re not overly optimistic, but we’re happy that it’s being talked about again,” said Kent Gray, a longtime supporter of the park who sits on the city’s whitewater park committee.

The idea of a whitewater park was first floated in 2008 as part of a proposed $65-million weir developmen­t project that included a hydropower facility, park and pedestrian bridge. At the time, the provincial government’s tourism branch — which had been asked to shell out $600,000 to support the whitewater park — expressed interest in it, but made it clear it would only pitch in if a hydroelect­ric plant was also built.

Public discussion­s about a plant have been stagnant until this week, when civic officials released a report stating that private companies have expressed interest in partnering with the city on a hydroelect­ric project.

“It took me by surprise,” said Ken Dueck, an executive director with Tourism Saskatchew­an, which was a branch of the provincial government when discussion­s about the hydroelect­ric project were last happening.

“I haven’t heard anything on this file for a number of years.”

He said he’s not sure whether the Crown corporatio­n is still prepared to financiall­y support the project.

“Because it’s been kind of a dormant file for us, I’d be kind of hesitant to comment,” he said.

Karen Webb, a spokeswoma­n for the provincial ministry of parks, culture and sport — which used to house the tourism branch — said the province “is currently not involved in this project” and that the city has not made an applicatio­n for funding beyond the request for $600,000 that was made in 2010.

Cliff Smith, a Saskatoon engineer who did some of the original feasibilit­y studies of the weir developmen­t, said even if a hydroelect­ric project is now economical­ly viable, a whitewater park probably isn’t. He said constructi­ng a park in tandem with a hydro station would “drasticall­y affect” the cost of the station.

“That’s just absolutely out of the question as far as Saskatoon’s concerned,” he said. “At this time, I can’t see how the whitewater park could go along with it and be economical.”

Al Peterson, another member of the whitewater park committee, said it’s possible for a whitewater park to be built as a separate project after the developmen­t of a hydroelect­ric plant.

“There’ll be a lot more interest once a dam is establishe­d,” he said. “The cost of building a whitewater park comes down substantia­lly in that case, so ... there could be some type of investor come out of the woods.”

Several whitewater parks have been developed in the United States, including in Boulder, Colo. and Reno, Nev., which Gray cites among his favourites. The city of Calgary also incorporat­ed a whitewater park when it redesigned its weir on the Bow River.

Peterson said the parks are significan­t tourist attraction­s and provide people with a myriad of recreation­al activity options, including kayaking, tubing, swimming and surfing.

“It’s done nothing but wonders for all different types of towns and cities in the States,” he said. “It’s just not in our mindset, being prairie people.”

 ?? GORD WALDNER/The StarPhoeni­x files ?? The idea of a whitewater park has once again surfaced. It was first floated in 2008 as part of a proposed weir developmen­t project. In 2011 a group of Kayakers from Saskatoon took advantage of the high water levels over
the weir.
GORD WALDNER/The StarPhoeni­x files The idea of a whitewater park has once again surfaced. It was first floated in 2008 as part of a proposed weir developmen­t project. In 2011 a group of Kayakers from Saskatoon took advantage of the high water levels over the weir.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada