Saskatoon StarPhoenix

Why does height still matter in dating world?

- JONATHAN WELLS LONDON DAILY TELEGRAPH

Last week, I created two online dating profiles. Both had exactly the same name, brief biography and three photograph­s — except for one small change. In the first, I said I was 5-7; in the second, 6-3.

In reality, I stand between 5-8 and 5-9. I’m certainly no Andre the Giant, but nor do I consider myself hobbitesqu­e.

Yet it would appear that for the majority of women, height is a crucial determiner in the search for a partner. My towering alter ego was “matched” 11 times, while my Lilliputia­n self received interest from just two women.

A brief search of women’s profiles on Tinder tells shorter men what they’ve long known — taller guys get the girls. Comments include: “You know what you call boys that are under six feet? Friends;” and “If u aren’t at least 6-3, I’m not interested.”

Even that cliched cornerston­e of what women look for in a man, “Tall, dark and handsome,” begins with a very heightist requiremen­t.

Don’t get me wrong, we can’t berate women for having “types.”

My question is this: why is it acceptable for a woman to shirk away from a shorter man, but when that same man declines the advances of a “larger” woman, he is labelled as a superficia­l pig?

Height and weight are both measuremen­ts. The only practical manner in which they differ is their permanence. A person’s height is considerab­ly more fixed than their weight — which makes it all the more unfair to judge. It’s not as if that man can just nip to his gym or lay off the cake to transform into modern culture’s towering image of attractive­ness.

Women are stipulatin­g superficia­l demands without fear of retributio­n. A friend of mine had a particular­ly crushing experience. He had been dating a girl who was a little taller than him for around three months when, the morning after a black-tie dinner and with no warning, she left him.

He told me: “I found out later that because she had been wearing these massive heels, she looked considerab­ly taller than me. And that was the reason she broke it off. One of her friends told her that from behind, it had looked like a mother walking her son to school.”

Many of the women’s profiles I encountere­d online included such blunt and bullheaded phrases as: “Don’t expect a reply if you’re under six feet;” “I only date tall men.”

What if they were demands being made by men of women’s weight? Jemima Wade, of online dating giant e-Harmony in the U.K., believes that judging prospectiv­e partners on their measuremen­ts, rather than other attributes, can only lead to misery.

She says: “Beyond ad hoc esthetics, the things that glue people together are similar values or beliefs, or a similar sense of humour or same ambitions or dreams. None have height or weight restrictio­ns.”

Perhaps female daters should wise up to their hypocrisy. If it’s entirely acceptable to use a measuring tape vertically, then so, too, should it be acceptable to wield it horizontal­ly. Or maybe it’s time we dialed down the outrage caused when asking someone about their weight.

 ?? JUNG YEON-JE/Getty Images ?? Apparently these enthusiast­ic fans of actor Tom Cruise, who’s 5 feet, 7 inches, didn’t get the memo about tall men.
JUNG YEON-JE/Getty Images Apparently these enthusiast­ic fans of actor Tom Cruise, who’s 5 feet, 7 inches, didn’t get the memo about tall men.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada