Saskatoon StarPhoenix

Another Winter Olympics for Calgary?

- Calgary group exploring economic feasibilit­y of bidding for 2026 Games vhall@postmedia.com Twitter.com/vickihallc­h VICKI HALL In Calgary

Nearly 30 years have passed since Hidy and Howdy roamed the streets of Calgary, but the footprint of the 1988 Olympics is embedded throughout the city.

The Olympic Oval at the University of Calgary still hosts speedskati­ng World Cups. The sliding track — made famous by the lovable Jamaican bobsled team — is still operating, with a $20-million facelift scheduled for next year.

WinSport’s Canada Olympic Park — Eddie the Eagle’s personal playground in 1988 — has the capacity to run Olympic moguls, aerials, slopestyle and halfpipe in freestyle skiing, and slopestyle, halfpipe and big air in snowboardi­ng.

The Saddledome — home to the 1988 Battle of the Brians — survived an epic flood and is still (barely) an NHL rink.

It’s by reusing those venues that Rick Hanson envisions a compact approach to manage both security and infrastruc­ture costs should Calgary bid for the 2026 Winter Games.

“We’re never going to justify huge capital costs based on 16 days nine years from now,” Hanson, chairman of the Calgary Bid Exploratio­n Committee, said Monday at a media roundtable to discuss the preliminar­y findings of the group exploring a potential Calgary bid for the 2026 Winter Olympics.

“In our mind, it’s hard to justify huge capital expenses for 16 days.”

Hanson is a former Calgary police chief who stepped down in 2015 to run for office (unsuccessf­ully) as a Progressiv­e Conservati­ve in the Alberta election. He concedes the cost of securing the Games is impossible to quantify given these uncertain times of Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin and Kim Jong Un.

And through opinion polls, Calgarians have let it be known that, while they might love the idea of another Olympics, they have little appetite for running up billion-dollar deficits to pass down to future generation­s.

The bid exploratio­n committee looks at the 2014 Sochi Games — and the outrageous $50-billion cost associated with Russia building an Olympic site from scratch — as an outlier. The average price tag for the previous three Winter Games in Vancouver, Turin and Salt Lake City is estimated at $3.2 billion, with about $1.5 billion each going to security and facilities.

By setting up five clusters — Stampede Park, the University of Calgary, WinSport (Canada Olympic Park), the Canmore Nordic Centre and Lake Louise and/or Nakiska — Hanson said security costs can be better contained with help from new surveillan­ce technology. And by drawing on the legacy facilities from 1988, infrastruc­ture costs are expected to be more manageable.

“Will there need to be some adjustment­s or some improvemen­ts? Sure,” Hanson said of Calgary’s legacy facilities. “But it’s not going to be anywhere near $1.5 billion.”

The Nakiska Ski Resort in nearby Kananaskis Country hosted the alpine events in 1988. That venue is under considerat­ion for 2026 along with the world-class Lake Louise Ski Resort, which is sure to create controvers­y given the potential environmen­tal impact of hosting Olympic races in a national park.

Should the federal government grant permission for the invasion of the five-ring circus, watch for the traditiona­l alpine events to take place at Lake Louise with skicross, snowboardc­ross and snowboard parallel giant slalom going to Nakiska.

The Canmore Nordic Centre, a gem left over from ’88, is the obvious host for cross-country skiing and biathlon.

The two big-ticket facilities missing from the Calgary area are an Olympic-regulation ski jump — the main tower at Canada Olympic Park is decommissi­oned and the wrong size — and a new arena (already under city council considerat­ion is constructi­on of a new home for the Calgary Flames north of the Saddledome).

“You do require two full-sized arenas to host the Games,” Hanson said. “So that’s just a fact.”

The ski jump is likely destined for another location away from WinSport, given the new size requiremen­t of 120 metres would force competitor­s to land on the Trans-Canada Highway. Given the lack of Canadian success and participat­ion in the sport, spending millions of dollars on a new facility will no doubt be contentiou­s should Calgary proceed with a bid.

All along, Hanson has repeatedly emphasized the bid exploratio­n committee has made no decisions on whether it makes sense for Calgary to proceed. It’s called an exploratio­n committee for a reason. But the time for researchin­g and dissecting the possibilit­y is drawing to a close, with a final report due in July.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada