Saskatoon StarPhoenix

Province needs new low-carbon strategy

Rural and Indigenous communitie­s stand to benefit, Diane Adams writes.

- Diane Adams, an environmen­tal health expert and a 2017-18 fellow in Action Canada’s Your Energy Future program, is a graduate student in the University of Saskatchew­an’s School of Public Health.

Saskatchew­an has a new premier and a new cabinet. Now, the province needs a fresh outlook on carbon pricing. It must include a made-in-Saskatchew­an carbon pricing plan.

Early signals from Premier Scott Moe suggest the government remains ready for a war with Ottawa on carbon taxation. Fighting the federal government is a battle Moe won’t likely win.

While this approach might win political points at home, it will leave Saskatchew­an stuck with a carbon tax framework designed by Ottawa. That framework won’t be tailored to the province’s priorities, such as protecting important industries like oil and gas.

Ottawa’s plan will be a carbon levy, like Alberta’s system. This type of carbon pricing is commonly known as a carbon tax, where taxes are collected on fossil fuels and high-emitting industries, and Ottawa decides how to redistribu­te the revenues.

Saskatchew­an’s business community doesn’t think a tax is the right approach. In 2016, the Saskatchew­an Chamber of Commerce surveyed their members about carbon pricing. Sixty-five per cent of respondent­s said they believe a cap-and-trade regime would be a better fit for the province if carbon pricing became mandatory.

Cap-and-trade is an alternativ­e to carbon taxation. It’s the approach used by Ontario and Quebec. In this case, a province caps its emissions each year and companies trade carbon pollution allotments in a marketplac­e.

The new made-in-Saskatchew­an climate plan, released late last year, already shares some elements of a cap-and-trade system. If that plan isn’t updated to include carbon pricing, we will all pay a carbon tax instead.

Saskatchew­an’s rural communitie­s and industries must be protected from the shocks of sudden price increases under carbon pricing and remain competitiv­e with jurisdicti­ons that aren’t pricing carbon, like the United States.

But if Saskatchew­an fails to develop a carbon pricing plan, it also loses out on hundreds of millions of federal dollars earmarked for clean developmen­t through the Low-Carbon Economy Fund.

That fund, combined with carbon tax revenues, could help lay the foundation for a lower-carbon, resilient and prosperous Saskatchew­an economy. For Saskatchew­an’s rural and Indigenous communitie­s, a long-term low-carbon vision is needed, unobstruct­ed by short-term political gains.

In March, a group of Action Canada fellows (including myself ) will release a policy report called Friends in Low (Carbon) Places: Supporting Clean Economies for Rural and Indigenous Canadians. For this report, young experts in rural and Indigenous economic developmen­t shared their vision for low-carbon rural economies.

They said they want economies based on low-emission natural resource industries, including renewable energy, mining, agricultur­e — even oil and gas. They want economies and infrastruc­ture that support goals like human health, a healthy natural environmen­t, strong social connection­s and wealth.

They want rural economies that can compete in a global digital world but said poor education and basic infrastruc­ture stand in the way.

They did NOT say carbon pricing stands in the way. They’re ready to compete in a low-carbon economy.

Saskatchew­an’s leaders should call on Ottawa to deliver on the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommun­ications Commission (CRTC)’s ambitious high-speed rural internet targets. The CRTC recently called high-speed internet a basic public service.

Saskatchew­an should also ensure the federal infrastruc­ture bank covers public transit, water, energy and transporta­tion projects that benefit rural communitie­s.

Infrastruc­ture investment­s in low-carbon lifestyles and economies will make rural communitie­s desirable and healthy places to live for generation­s to come.

Our new premier should demand the federal government act to close educationa­l and economic gaps between Indigenous peoples and the rest of Canada.

The future of rural Canada relies on the success of Indigenous people and communitie­s, and Ottawa has failed them for too long.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada