New NAFTA hits a snag
MEXICO OBJECTS TO U.S. LABOUR INSPECTORS AS TRADE REP CLAIMS HE WAS BLINDSIDED
Atop Mexican trade negotiator flew to Washington for urgent talks Sunday as a hitch emerged in the U.S.-Mexico-canada Agreement, just days after it was signed.
Jesús Seade, undersecretary for North America in the Foreign Ministry, accused the United States of blindsiding Mexico by deciding to send up to five U.S. attaches to monitor labour conditions as part of the treaty.
That decision was included in implementing legislation sent to the U.S. Congress on Friday. The new treaty is intended to replace the North American Free Trade Agreement.
Mexico’s labour practices were a major sticking point in the final rounds of negotiations on the accord. U.S. unions — and their allies in the Democratic Party — pushed for tough enforcement of a new Mexican law that guarantees workers the right to elect their leaders and approve contracts. In the past, Mexican unions were often under the thumb of businesses and politicians, who kept a lid on workers’ wages.
During the talks, Mexico rejected a U.S. proposal for foreign labour inspectors, saying it would violate the country’s sovereignty. Instead negotiators agreed to establish three-member panels — made up of Mexican, American and other experts — to resolve disputes.
Seade said he had sent a letter to Robert Lighthizer, the U.S. trade representative, expressing “Mexico’s surprise and concern” about the language sent to Congress.
The decision to send labour attaches was “never mentioned to Mexico — never,” Seade told journalists on Saturday. “And, of course, we don’t agree.”
On Sunday, he was even more blunt. “We gained a lot in the trilateral talks, and because of this, the U.S. needs ‘extras’ that are NOT PART OF THE TREATY in order to sell it to its domestic audience,” Seade tweeted.
“Mexico will NEVER accept any measure that would see inspectors disguised for a simple reason: Mexican law prohibits it,” Seade wrote in a series of tweets, some of which were later deleted, adding for emphasis in another one: “NO INSPECTORS.”
The U.S. trade representative’s office did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
But Lighthizer told CBS News’s Face the Nation on Sunday that the treaty “was more enforceable and it’s better for American workers and American manufacturers and agriculture workers than it was before.”
Mexico’s Senate voted overwhelmingly Thursday to approve the treaty, just two days after it was signed by the three nations’ negotiators in the Mexican capital. But the labour issue has since blossomed into a political controversy here. Critics have charged that Seade was careless or naive.
“It was a serious error for Seade to have gone alone to the final negotiations on USMCA,” José Antonio Crespo, a political scientist at the Center for Research and Teaching in Economics wrote on Twitter. “If he had been advised by Mexican personnel, he wouldn’t have been tricked, or be pretending that he’d been tricked.”
Seade said Mexico would never accept foreign labour inspectors “for a simple reason: Mexican law doesn’t allow them.”
The Foreign Ministry noted in a communique that Mexico could reject any such diplomats the United States sought to post in the country.