The Southwest Booster

Taxpayers, Students bailout University pension

- COLIN CRAIG CANADIAN TAXPAYERS FEDERATION

Not only are taxpayers bailing out the latest struggling government employee pension plan in Saskatchew­an, university students also get to pitch in this time.

Pensions can be complicate­d, so here’s a plain English descriptio­n of what’s going on at the University of Regina and why it’s not fair for taxpayers and students.

Back in 2006, University of Regina employees enrolled in the non-academic pension plan (support staff, not professors) put in 5.15 per cent of their salary into the university’s staff pension plan.

If an employee at the university had earnings of $38,835, they would put in $2,000 per year into the plan.

However, at the same time the University of Regina would match employee contributi­ons. In other words, students, through their tuition fees, and taxpayers through taxes provided to the university from the provincial government, would also put in $2,000.

Considerin­g 75 per cent of Saskatchew­an taxpayers working outside government don’t have a workplace pension plan, and have no one matching their retirement savings contributi­ons, you can see how sweet a deal that is for the employee. Not to mention most students would some day graduate and not have the same benefit themselves.

But it gets better...for employees that is, not students and taxpayers.

The type of pension plan non-academic employees enjoy actually guarantees them payouts for the rest of their life, no matter how long they live. So while people in the private sector without pensions have to worry about what could happen to their RRSPs when an economic slowdown takes a bite out of their savings, the university employees in the nonacademi­c plan don’t have the same worry. This obviously requires people managing the University of Regina’s plan to make a whole bunch of impossible guesses – how long will employees live? What will happen with the economy over the next forty years? What will happen with interest rates? Inflation?

Not surprising­ly the plan, like so many others built this way, hasn’t worked out and needs more money. As of 2008, the contributi­on rate went up to 6.5 per cent of their earnings. The rate increased again in 2010 to 7.75 per cent and is going up to 8.75 per cent as of January 1, 2014.

It may not seem like a big increase, but consider how it plays out money-wise. Hiking contributi­on rates to 8.75 per cent, means that taxpayers and students will no longer put in $2,000 like they did for an employee with earnings of $38,835 in 2008, they would now put in about $3,398. That’s a 69.9 per cent increase in terms of the amount put in. Multiply that by hundreds or thousands of employees and the money really starts to add up.

So what needs to change? The University of Regina needs to do something Saskatchew­an’s NDP did with most government employees back in the late 1970s. All new employees should be put in a new, less costly type of pension plan – one that doesn’t require constant rate increases and protects taxpayers from surprise shortfalls. It’s called a defined contributi­on plan.

It may not be as golden as the current plan, but even with matched contributi­ons of 5.15 per cent it would still be significan­tly better than most people enjoy.

One thing is for certain, the university needs a lesson in fairness. What’s going on now just isn’t fair for taxpayers or students.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada