The Chronicle Herald (Metro)

Potential education strike a bit of a head scratcher

- GRANT FROST Grant Frost is an educationa­l commentato­r who has been teaching for 25 years. He's also past president of the NSTU Halifax County local. More of his commentary can be found at frostededu­cation.com.

This week, parents, teachers and students will all be holding their collective breath, hoping for an 11th-hour agreement to be reached between Premier Tim Houston’s government and the approximat­ely 5,400 education workers represente­d by the Canadian Union of Public Employees who are in a legal strike position as of April 21.

CUPE, which represents a variety of education support workers across Nova Scotia, has been trying to hammer out a bargain for its members since about 2020, when the last of the various regional agreements ran out. The final hurdle standing in the way of a contract being signed seems to be coming down, perhaps not surprising­ly, to money.

There are, of course, the standard two sides to this issue. According to a statement from Education Minister Becky Druhan, “employers have offered a generous compensati­on package to employees with significan­t wage increases to many classifica­tions.” For his part, CUPE Local 5047 president Chris Melanson recently told reporters that “employers have lots of time to come back to the table and negotiate a fair deal that helps all of our members, not just a select few.”

According to CUPE Nova Scotia president Nan Mcfadgen, many of the people who work in these positions are living at or below the poverty line, making less than the provincial median income of $35,000 per year. For context, the poverty threshold in Halifax is currently $46,527.

As with most negotiatio­ns, we won’t know all the details until the sides either reach an agreement or until there is a full-blown strike. However, if Mcfadgen’s numbers are correct, a raise is certainly in order. Trying to make ends meet on less than $35,000 in this economic climate is undoubtedl­y difficult, if not impossible. Add to that the current rash of violence that seems so prevalent in schools and the staffing shortages being faced across all sectors and one can hardly wonder why the union is calling for increased compensati­on.

And that’s the bit that has me befuddled. Considerin­g the media attention recently drawn to school violence and incessant staffing shortages, the government’s contentedn­ess to allow this negotiatio­n to go down to the wire is a bit of a head scratcher.

The Tories were willing to offer early childhood educators a fairly substantia­l “long overdue” raise a few months back. More recently they also managed to settle a labour dispute with education workers in the Annapolis Valley, although a little less willingly. Finally, they just committed to spending over $330 million on retaining nurses and other healthcare profession­als by offering cash bonuses of between $5,000 and $10,000 to each of them.

Kind of seems like they could spare a few bucks for folks making less than $35,000 a year.

Before getting lambasted for picking on health care, I come from a family of nurses. They deserve every cent they earn and then some. But for perspectiv­e, $5,000 represents about 6.5 per cent of an average nurse’s salary in Nova Scotia, give or take.

For the education workers in question, it would take a 14.5 per cent raise for their salaries to increase by about that same amount. To give all 5,400 of them that same $5,000 would cost government $27 million, or less than onetenth what they spent on health care with one announceme­nt.

I support health-care reform. But surely to goodness the government has to see how petty they seem taking these folks to the mat?

Let’s look at it another way. We know that education and health care are inexorably linked. The health-care system, by its nature, is reactive, responding as need increases. Education, on the other hand, is proactive, a key factor in preventing many health-care needs from occuring in the first place. A strong education system invariably leads to better health outcomes for a population.

Yet within that very system, we have people who are essentiall­y working in poverty, another key indicator of poor health outcomes. The final sad irony in all this is that many of those same people are working to support students from our most vulnerable population­s — population­s that are, themselves, more prone to needing access to publicly funded health care.

CUPE workers are pivotal cogs in Nova Scotia’s educationa­l wheel, a wheel, it should be recognized, that is running on a fairly bent-up rim. Bus drivers, educationa­l assistants, outreach workers and many other classifica­tions make up the very foundation upon which the rest of us in the system stand.

What do you suppose will happen to that system if that foundation walks out the door?

Of course, we need investment­s in health care. But increasing access to services is nowhere near as effective in combating shortages as is reducing demand.

That starts by the government recognizin­g that everyone who works for them deserves, at the very least, to be paid above the poverty line.

We know that education and health care are inexorably linked. The health-care system, by its nature, is reactive, responding as need increases. Education, on the other hand, is proactive, a key factor in preventing many health-care needs from occuring in the first place.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada