The Chronicle Herald (Provincial)

Contaminat­ed site management questioned

- FRANCIS CAMPBELL THE CHRONICLE HERALD fcampbell@herald.ca @frankscrib­bler

Nova Scotians want assurance that contaminat­ed sites across the province are managed properly so as not to pose a health threat, a Progressiv­e Conservati­ve MLA told a public accounts committee Wednesday.

“The perennial, pre-eminent question before us here at this committee through the report of the auditor general is the question of is the province appropriat­ely managing contaminat­ed sites,” said Tim Halman.

“Obviously, we know Nova Scotians want that assurance.”

The auditor general's report from July 2020 certainly did not provide that assurance and it's unclear that the committee meeting did, either.

Then acting auditor general Terry Spicer reported in July 2020 that the province doesn't have a good grasp on assessing, managing and monitoring contaminat­ed sites despite risks posed to human health and the environmen­t.

Spicer reported that while multiple department­s have different responsibi­lities in relation to contaminat­ed sites, a co-ordinated approach of how to deal with the sites was lacking.

Paul Lafleche, deputy minister of the provincial department­s of Lands and Forestry and Transporta­tion and Active Transit, said at the committee Wednesday the AG'S recommenda­tion for an oversight body to implement a consistent, co-ordinated approach for assessing and managing known contaminat­ed sites has been addressed by establishi­ng an interdepar­tmental advisory group.

Lafleche is chairman of the deputy minister committee that is accountabl­e to the premier and cabinet, a committee that approves direction and provides oversight for the advisory group's work.

The advisory group membership includes senior officials from Lands and Forestry, Agricultur­e, Inclusive Economic Growth, Energy and Mines, Nova Scotia Lands and the Nova Scotia Health Authority.

Apparently unconvince­d that the advisory group inspires the confidence Nova Scotians seek, Halman said, “there are definitely a lot of moving parts to this.”

The auditor general identified those moving parts nearly two years ago in an audit that focused on Lands and Forestry and Transporta­tion, the department­s the auditor said administer­s most of the provincial­ly owned contaminat­ed sites.

“Each department had different processes to identify sites, not all potentiall­y contaminat­ed sites were tracked, and historical informatio­n was not readily available,” Spicer's statement said at the time.

Spicer said ongoing monitoring and tracking of sites are important to ensure management has appropriat­e informatio­n to make resourcing decisions, and to assess potential risks arising from future activities on the site.

“We also found that the province does not have a process to prioritize site evaluation­s and remediatio­n,” the AG stated. “Provincial resources, both funding and staff time, are limited; therefore, prioritizi­ng the use of provincial resources is essential.”

As of March 31, 2019, the province recorded a $372.1-million liability for contaminat­ed sites and was responsibl­e for tracking 127 sites, the auditor found.

Connie Roney, manager of environmen­tal services for the province, said Wednesday each department has legal responsibi­lity for managing contaminat­ed sites and the advisory group has been establishe­d to share best practices and ideas about managing sites.

“Every year, department­s prepare a list of contaminat­ed sites, they go to the finance and treasury board and the additional work of the advisory committee is to provide a consistent approach to developing lists and then to work toward a consistent approach to assuring that the guidelines in the treasury board manual are being consistent­ly applied in developing estimates for those contaminat­ed site liabilitie­s.”

The auditor general found in 2020 that one in four recommenda­tions from a 2010 audit had not been completed. He added four more recommenda­tions in 2020 and Lafleche said the oversight recommenda­tion and two others have been met.

Roney said another recommenda­tion, to complete an inventory of known and potentiall­y contaminat­ed sites the province is responsibl­e for, falls under the purview of each individual department.

Lafleche said the third AG recommenda­tion that suggests the province implement a risk-based approach to assess and prioritize all known and contaminat­ed sites falls to the shared expertise of the advisory group to “address compliance under the contaminat­ed sites regulation­s.”

Stephen Macisaac is president and CEO of Nova Scotia Lands, the Crown corporatio­n that assists provincial department­s for engineerin­g and constructi­on of large-scale industrial remediatio­n.

Macisaac said the corporatio­n is currently active in three major locations, with the operation, remediatio­n and redevelopm­ent of the Sydney Steel plant site, the remediatio­n and redevelopm­ent of the former Bowater Mersey Paper site in Liverpool and the former DSME Trenton site.

He said the corporatio­n is also involved in long-term monitoring and maintenanc­e of former industrial sites.

“In addition to our own sites, Nova Scotia Lands have become involved over the years in providing these same services to several other government department­s,” Macisaac said. “We currently manage the Boat Harbour remediatio­n project on behalf of Nova Scotia Transporta­tion and the Montague Mines and Goldenvill­e mine site tailings closures in HRM and Guysboroug­h County for Nova Scotia Lands and Forestry.

Macisaac said the $290-million Boat Harbour remediatio­n is well underway and is currently at a federal assessment process, the Montague and Goldenvill­e mines projects are still at the planning stage and the former abandoned mine site assessment project is in the prioritiza­tion and assessment stage.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada