The Daily Courier

Feds must move on expungemen­ts

- RICHARD

Cannabis was legalized in Canada this October, but unfortunat­ely the federal government didn’t include one important piece in that legislatio­n: expungemen­t of the records of a half-million Canadians with criminal records for simple possession of cannabis.

These people are saddled with a criminal record for doing something that we now consider completely legal. And a criminal record is a serious problem—you are barred from internatio­nal travel, barred from many jobs, and even barred from many community volunteer positions such as coaching.

In Toronto, 15 per cent of people on social welfare cite “Need for a Record Suspension” as a key barrier to employment. Renting an apartment with a criminal record can be a problem.

My colleague Murray Rankin, MP for Victoria, has tabled a private member’s bill in the House of Commons that would expunge these records, and I spoke in favour of the bill last Friday. For their part, the government is suggesting that they may introduce legislatio­n next year allowing those with possession records to apply for pardons, but expungemen­t is much more appropriat­e and effective in this case than pardons.

First, pardons are time-consuming and expensive. Applicants must wait at least five years after the end of their sentence before applying. From there, they must pay $631 and fill out a lengthy form that requires them to submit informatio­n from police stations and local courts. After that it usually takes about two years to hear if you’re successful. The government has said that planned legislatio­n may change these rules for cannabis possession records.

Secondly, pardons, or record suspension­s as they are now called, don’t eliminate criminal records—they simply separate them into a different category. Border agents or police officers will likely be able to see that someone has had a criminal record for possession and a subsequent pardon. What is needed here, what would be a truly just solution, is to eliminate the record altogether—expungemen­t.

Expungemen­t is usually carried out for groups of people who have criminal records for acts now considered legal, especially groups that have faced historical injustices. This is certainly the case for cannabis conviction­s, which have been given disproport­ionately to marginaliz­ed Canadians, especially visible minorities.

If you’re an Indigenous person in Regina, you’re nine times more likely to have a possession record than if you’re non-Indigenous; in Vancouver you are seven times more likely. If you’re black in Halifax, you’re five times more likely to have a possession record than if you’re not black, in Toronto that figure is three times more likely.

These figures have absolutely no relation to the rate of cannabis use in different groups, or in different parts of the country.

It’s time to fix these unjust criminal records. It’s been done in several U.S. states—California, Vermont, Delaware and North Dakota—and it should be done in Canada.

I sincerely hope the government supports this expungemen­t bill that would clear the unjust criminal record for these Canadians so that they can get this millstone off their necks.

Richard Cannings is the MP for South Okanagan-West Kootenay and member of the NDP caucus.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada