The Daily Courier

Royal family pays its fair share

-

Dear Editor:

Re: “Royal couple selfish,” (Herald/Daily

Courier letters, Jan. 17).

The writer demonstrat­es a common misconcept­ion — that taxpayers pay for the Royal Family. In fact, the combined estate of the Royal Family is managed independen­tly by a private firm and more than pays the way of the Royal Family.

The Queen and Prince Charles pay a great deal of income tax, even though they are exempt. The British government pays a minimal stipend which is a leftover from the era when the monarchy was not selfsuppor­ting.

Security is mostly a government responsibi­lity as the military is integral to the ceremonial that surrounds the monarchy, but the estate can certainly afford to cover this cost if indeed it does not already.

I am sorry I do not know the details of the security of the Royal Family. This is perhaps an indication that the security is, in fact, effective. I’m not sure.

With regard to the issue of selfishnes­s, it’s interestin­g that binary thinking still abounds. The writer’s personal knowledge and approval of the Queen et al seems to preclude the idea that, in areas of conflict, both sides can have valid points and concerns. I suspect that there is so much of the story that we are not aware of that judgement is premature.

It may be a case of selfishnes­s or it may be enlightene­d self-interest. The fact that they are willing to continue to perform some royal duties suggests to me that they are protecting their personal lives and willing to become financiall­y independen­t to do so.

In regard to the last point, I agree that it should not cost Canadian taxpayers anything beyond what any other resident of our fine country is accorded.

I must also say that the Daily Courier does an outstandin­g job of bringing issues forward and stimulatin­g dialogue — this discussion being a small example. In any case, continue the good work — an informed populace is the bedrock of a functionin­g democracy (any comments regarding how well ours is or is not working not withstandi­ng). Pat Wahl Kelowna

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada