The Daily Courier

Sickle Point purchase in jeopardy

- Results are based on an online study conducted Jan. 13-18 by Insights West among a sample of 824 B.C. residents. The margin of error is +/- 3.4 percentage points. 19 times out of 20.

by using the clues already provided. The more numbers you name, the easier it gets.

The planned public purchase of a piece of land in the South Okanagan has hit a snag.

A total of 805 qualified elector response forms were received in opposition to a plan by the Regional District of Okanagan-Similkamee­n to borrow up to $3.5 million to buy Sickle Point, near Kaleden, the local government announced Tuesday. Under the alternate approval process, only 182 registered opponents were needed. Now, the RDOS must decide whether to hold a referendum or stop the process.

As 2021 begins with COVID-19 vaccinatio­n rollout plans in the news on a daily basis, a recent survey of B.C. residents shows that many aren’t entirely supportive of the current distributi­on plans and hold differing opinions about the prioritiza­tion of the list of initial recipients.

Unlike the support received for most of the previous provincial government initiative­s and policies relating to the pandemic, one of the policy plans has been met with significan­t opposition.

In fact, the majority of residents do not give the overall vaccinatio­n rollout plans a positive review, as 51% rate the overall rollout plan as ‘fair’ (31%), ‘poor’ (14%), or ‘very poor’ (7%), and only a minority (35%) rate the current plan as ‘good’ (30%) or ‘excellent’ (5%).

A similar rating is seen for the clarity of the order of who will get vaccinated as only 39% consider the clarity of the rollout plan/prioritiza­tion to be ‘good’ (28%) or ‘excellent’ (11%), while most (53%) provide fair, poor or very poor ratings.

While a majority approve of the fairness of the prioritiza­tion/who receives the vaccinatio­ns first (51% rate the plan as ‘good’ (34%) or ‘excellent’ (17%), there is a significan­t minority who are not in favour (38% rate it fair, poor or very poor.

Further, low scores are given to the execution of the plan to date as only 30% rate it good or excellent, while most (57%) provide lower ratings.

Despite concerns about the vaccine rollout plans and the order of recipients, the vast majority are ready to roll up their sleeves to be vaccinated when their time comes.

Most (80%) will ‘definitely’ (58%) or ‘probably’ (22%) get the vaccine when its available, and only very few indicate they are opposed to it (7% ‘definitely will not’ and 5% ‘probably will not’).

Older residents (55 years-plus) are more likely to ‘definitely’ get vaccinated (67%) than those in younger age groups (52% 18-34 and 53% 35-54 years).

The list of those who will receive the first vaccines is not without controvers­y, as there is strong support for placing a number of groups on the priority list ahead of some already there.

The first and highest ‘miss’ on the list is those with underlying medical conditions that put them at greater risk of severe illness from COVID-19.

In addition, about half think police (51%), teachers (50%), firefighte­rs (47%), other healthcare providers who are not on the original list (46%) and essential service workers (45%) should have been placed higher on the priority list.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada