The Daily Courier

Recognitio­n of cancer risk is tough battle

- By CAMILLE BAINS

VANCOUVER — Jenn Dawkins remembers the spring day in 2016 when she joined four other female firefighte­rs at British Columbia’s legislatur­e to lobby for the inclusion of breast cancer as a presumed occupation­al illness covered by the province’s health and safety agency for workers.

Dawkins was diagnosed with breast cancer three years later.

“I went through a mastectomy and four months of chemothera­py during the early stage of the pandemic,” she said. Reconstruc­tive surgery followed.

“This is an actual result of simply going to work and doing my job,” said Dawkins, who has since returned to fighting fires in Vancouver, where she has been employed for 22 years.

Dawkins now wants other firefighte­rs to be protected with legislatio­n that makes cancer a presumed occupation­al hazard because of exposure to known carcinogen­s. Her counterpar­ts in Quebec have the least protection of any jurisdicti­on in Canada.

Dawkins was covered for workers’ compensati­on benefits because a year after her trip to the legislatur­e, B.C. added breast cancer, along with prostate cancer and multiple myeloma, to the list of presumptiv­e cancers affecting firefighte­rs. That meant they no longer had to prove their disease was directly linked to a high-risk job.

British Columbia recently amended the Workers Compensati­on Act to include three more cancers — ovarian, cervical and penile — on a list that now totals 16 presumptiv­e cancers.

Cancers affecting the reproducti­ve system are being added across much of the country, as more women take on firefighti­ng. Benefits kick in after a certain number of years on the job, between five and 20 years in B.C., for example, depending on the type of cancer.

Each province and territory has its own list of cancers that are presumed to be linked to firefighti­ng because workers’ compensati­on legislatio­n is not federally enacted.

The Internatio­nal Associatio­n of Fire Fighters and the Canadian Associatio­n of Fire Chiefs are supporting Quebec member of Parliament Sherry Romanado’s recent introducti­on of a private member’s bill focusing on national standards for occupation­al cancers linked to firefighti­ng.

It says raising awareness is crucial to helping firefighte­rs identify early signs of cancer for testing and treatment and calls for regular screening for the disease.

Chris Ross, president of the Montreal Firefighte­rs Associatio­n, said he’s hoping momentum from the bill that has garnered wide political support will help push the Quebec government to add more presumptiv­e cancers.

The province did not recognize cancer as a high occupation­al risk for firefighte­rs until last year.

Quebec has listed nine cancers as being related to firefighti­ng, the lowest number in the country, and Ross said the associatio­n faced opposition to adding more cancers like leukemia, brain and breast cancer.

The associatio­n launched legal action against its workers’ compensati­on agency on behalf of firefighte­rs diagnosed mostly with brain, testicular and esophageal cancers as well as leukemia, Ross said. It has won all of its cases, about 10 so far, in Quebec’s labour law tribunal, and a dozen settlement­s have been made outside that process, he added.

“We decided about eight years ago that every single cancer that was recognized elsewhere we would litigate,” he said, adding that scientific evidence from multiple studies related to cancer among firefighte­rs had paved the way to victory.

Quebec has convened a medical committee to recommend which cancers could be included in future legislatio­n, he said.

However, Ross said that’s an unacceptab­le substitute for the “courage of politician­s” to take action in a province that treats firefighte­rs like “second-class citizens.”

“Ultimately, fires don’t burn differentl­y in Gatineau compared to Ottawa. It’s not like

you cross the bridge and suddenly they’re more cancerous,” he said.

In Ontario, 17 cancers are presumed to be linked to firefighti­ng.

About 55 firefighte­rs in Quebec are believed to have died of cancer in the last 12 years, but the figure is likely higher, Ross said.

Alex Forrest, captain of the Winnipeg Fire Department, said Manitoba was the first in Canada in 2002 to include five presumptiv­e cancers for firefighte­rs. It now lists 19 cancers, the same as Nova Scotia and Yukon.

Forrest, who is also a lawyer, helped draft the legislatio­n in all three jurisdicti­ons before moving on to Alberta and beyond as presumptiv­e legislatio­n expanded across the country.

He was invited to Australia in 2011 to present scientific evidence on the link between firefighti­ng and cancer and said he had also educated government­s and organizati­ons in Europe about the firefighte­rs’ exposure to carcinogen­s like arsenic, benzene and cadmium.

In 2012, Australia became the third country in the world, after Canada and most jurisdicti­ons in the United States, to adopt such legislatio­n.

Forrest said there’s a lack of knowledge among epidemiolo­gists about dangerous levels of carcinogen­s, including the highly flammable chemical benzene, which is present at most fires, whether they are garbage, kitchen or large-structure blazes.

Firefighte­rs’ protective gear can withstand upwards of 1,000 C, but it does not protect them from cancer-causing agents because their clothing has to “breathe,” Forrest said.

It’s not inhalation or ingestion of chemicals, but absorption of particulat­es through firefighte­rs’ skin and into their bloodstrea­m that is most dangerous, he said.

“Firefighte­rs, over a career, will go to hundreds of fires. And you see cell manipulati­on start occurring after three to five years, which predicts cancer outcomes.”

Tim Baillie was diagnosed with two cancers after he retired from his 27-year career as a firefighte­r in Surrey, B.C.

“I was through customs, getting on a plane going to Mazatlan. And it was like someone stabbed me in my right abdomen,” he said of his experience in 2016, when he learned he had kidney cancer. “I ended up going to the emergency ward and had a five-centimetre fully encapsulat­ed cancer growth in my right kidney.”

In 2021, he was diagnosed with prostate cancer, which, like the first cancer, was listed under presumptiv­e legislatio­n.

Baillie is hoping all provinces move forward to acknowledg­e the reality that cancer is a top killer of firefighte­rs.

“It always comes down to money,” he said. Municipali­ties that employed firefighte­rs pay only marginally higher workers’ compensati­on rates to protect those who put their lives at risk just by going to work, he said.

Firefighte­rs must also take on provincial government­s that are often slow to act, Baillie said.

 ?? The Canadian Press ?? Vancouver firefighte­r Jenn Dawkins, shown in a handout photo, lobbied for breast cancer to be included in British Columbia’s legislatio­n as a presumed occupation­al illness covered by the province’s health and safety agency for workers.
The Canadian Press Vancouver firefighte­r Jenn Dawkins, shown in a handout photo, lobbied for breast cancer to be included in British Columbia’s legislatio­n as a presumed occupation­al illness covered by the province’s health and safety agency for workers.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada