The Economist (North America)

A dance to the music of time

It is not only individual­s’ bodies that have structure. Lives are structured, too

-

The organs of a body are a spatial division of labour, one created by different genes being turned on in different cells. The same process serves to give individual lives a division of labour over time. Complex algae, animals, fungi and plants all have predictabl­e life histories which separate out three basic aspects of developmen­t—the creation of an autonomous individual, growth and reproducti­on—and run them sequential­ly.

In some creatures, including humans, the move from one phase to the next has an obvious continuity. Fertilised eggs turn into fetuses, which become babies, who grow into two different sorts of adult, which, between them, can then produce new fertilised eggs. In other animals things are more clearly punctuated. The embryo growing inside a butterfly egg turns into a series of leafmunchi­ng and moulting caterpilla­rs, called instars. The last of these cocoons itself in a pupa before emerging, winged and fluttering, as an imago with a completely new set of organs. Plants have two separate life histories, which alternate from generation to generation—though this is rarely obvious to human observers.

A lot of the complexity here is to do with sex. The fission of a bacterium; the budding of a yeast cell; the vegetative growth of a tree pushing up suckers: each of these yields progeny geneticall­y identical to the progenitor and each other. Sex is clearly the start of something new: a novel individual with a novel genetic blueprint and a selfish Darwinian imperative that can put it at odds with even its siblings. Asexual individual­s often link up into wider structures—bacterial biofilms, coral heads or aspen forests, for example. Sexual individual­s almost never do this.

In sexual reproducti­on, each parent contribute­s only a half genome. In asexual reproducti­on the whole genome can get passed on. In terms of the “selfish gene” account of biology, a strategy which passes on all the genes seems intrinsica­lly more appealing than one in which half of them get left behind. Sex must therefore convey benefits worth dumping half a genome for.

The current belief is that these stem from the mixing of genes. By producing geneticall­y novel individual­s, sex poses a problem for parasites and pathogens and provides flexibility in changing circumstan­ces. Those advantages compensate for its inefficiency. Caenorhabd­itis elegans,a nematode worm much favoured in biology laboratori­es, reproduces asexually in benign environmen­ts but starts creating some males when things get more challengin­g, in order to mix things up a bit. That said, mysteries abide—for instance, bdelloid rotifers, which seem to have been exclusivel­y asexual for 25m years.

Once fertilised, an animal egg grows into an embryo, or something equivalent to one. An embryo’s role is to lay the groundwork for subsequent developmen­ts. It produces what, in Silicon Valley, might be termed a minimum viable product. When a human embryo is born as a baby, it already contains almost all of the organs which that individual will ever possess.

This comes about first by the repeated division of the initial, fertilised egg into many cells that have the potential to become any part of the body. Then, around the 16th day of developmen­t, the embryo folds in on itself in a process called gastrulati­on. This sees the body plan begin to take on a physical form, defining the head and the tail (for human embryos do, indeed, have tails), the left and the right, the inner and the outer.

After gastrulati­on, more and more cell lines have their future possibilit­ies pared down as molecular switches disable some genes and promote the activity of others. Each cell line is thus guided along a path that leads to its specialisa­tion as part of an organ. A few laggards, called stem cells, drop out of this journey. Their role is to generate, throughout an individual’s life, replacemen­ts for cells that have died. But many specialise­d cells, particular­ly in the muscles and the nervous system, do go on to last a lifetime.

Other species have similar tales to tell, but not identical ones. For example, a but

terfly embryo develops not only the organs needed in order to be a caterpilla­r, but also starter packs, called imaginal discs, for the organs that will be needed in adulthood.

For most plants, things are more complex because there are two, radically different, types of body. This again is a division of labour, one in which mating and dispersal have been separated.

Cells in gametophyt­es, the mating body type, have a single complement of chromosome­s—a state known as being “haploid”, which is also seen in the eggs and sperm of animals. It is the process of creating haploid cells that sees half of each parent’s genome scrapped in sexual reproducti­on. Unlike eggs and sperm, though, these haploid cells can grow and differentiate themselves, creating the gametophyt­e body.

Once it has grown sufficiently a gametophyt­e will produce eggs and sperm, which meet and mate, pooling their chromosome­s to create “diploid” individual­s that grow into a bodytype called a sporophyte. Sporophyte­s produce haploid spores, which they often seek to distribute as widely as possible—a valuable strategy for a stationary creature.

In mosses, the larger of the two forms is the gametophyt­e. In ferns, it is the sporophyte, though the gametophyt­e is still visible to the naked eye. In flowering plants things have gone further still, with the gametophyt­e stage essentiall­y being absorbed into the sporophyte. The gametophyt­es of an oak, for example, are microscopi­c addenda to the sporophyte body: the pollen grains born by its male catkins and the embryo sacs in its female flowers.

In flowering plants like oaks, progenydis­persal is achieved not through haploid spores but instead by the fertilised embryo sacs creating embryocont­aining seeds— which, in oaks, are called acorns. The embryo in an acorn lacks precursors of many adult organs. Leaves are grown later, as required, from stem cells known as meristems. But it is equipped with an incipient root and stem, and also has two foodstorin­g leaves, called cotyledons.

Once an embryo is out of its womb, its eggshell or its seed, its main aim is to grow. In children, larvae, saplings and even the young gametophyt­es and sporophyte­s of ferns, physiologi­cal resources are focused on developing the size and competenci­es that will be needed to prosper in the mating game and subsequent child rearing— even if that role is limited to cramming protein into an acorn.

For many creatures, the growth stage is at first blush similar to the adult, but just smaller. The onset of puberty, striking as it is for a human to undergo, has little effect on the overall body plan. But for some, notably among the insects, it can be startlingl­y different. The specialise­d eating machine which is a caterpilla­r or a maggot, for example, allows energy to be stored through the use of an ecological niche the adult could not gain access to.

For an adult to reproduce, and thus pass on its genes, it must first find a mate. Sometimes the finding is done directly by the sperm—fern’s sperm swim from the antheridia in which they form, through films of water, in search of the eggbearing archegonia of other gametophyt­es. Sometimes it is done by the adults, through courtship rituals or competitio­ns. Many flowering plants exploit a gobetween in the form of a pollinatin­g insect, bat or bird.

Temporary kings

An oak bears its first acorns two or three decades after it has germinated, and may keep doing so for centuries. A human, after puberty, can look forward to decades of subsequent life. Many adulthoods, however, are brief. An extreme example is the mayfly, the imagos of which cannot feed themselves and exist only to mate and, if female, lay their fertilised eggs back in the water from which they have just emerged.

In animals, adults of longlived species often look after their offspring and sometimes, to some degree, those of others as well. It makes sense to collaborat­e with a close relative in child rearing because their children will carry some of your genes, but it can also make sense if the adults are not related, especially in situations where favours are reciprocat­ed. It is thought that this social aspect of child rearing may explain why in a few species—humans and killer whales are notable examples—adults may live quite some time after they stop being capable of reproducti­on.

Long or short, though, all lives go the same way. Onward transmissi­on of the body’s genes achieved (or not), the individual itself matters not a jot to evolution. This explains why individual­s grow not just old, but decrepit. They have evolved to be thrown away.

Inevitable mortality means that bodily repairs and maintenanc­e need not be perfect, particular­ly if the physiologi­cal resources needed for them could be put to better use in mating and reproducti­on. Damage to a body’s cells therefore gradually accumulate­s with age.

For animals, the transition from life to death, even when not administer­ed by a predator, is rapid. The interdepen­dence of an animal’s organs means some failures— in particular, failure of the circulator­y system—are almost instantly fatal. A large plant, by contrast, may die slowly, for it has no vital organs. Die, however, it will. But its progeny may live on, to crossferti­lise once more with others of their kind. Biologists call such sets of interferti­le organisms “species”. The slipperine­ss of that seemingly simple concept is dealt with in the next Biology brief. n

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada