The Economist (North America)

Factory fresh

Your next home could emerge from a printer

-

Abatch of new houses across California is selling unusually fast. In the past two months, 82 have been snapped up, and the waiting list is 1,000 long. That demand should, though, soon be satisfied—for, while it can take weeks to put up a convention­al bricksandm­ortar dwelling, Palari Homes and Mighty Buildings, the collaborat­ors behind these houses, are able to erect one in less than 24 hours. They can do it so rapidly because their products are assembled from components prefabrica­ted in a factory. This is not, in itself, a new idea. But the components involved are made in an unusual way: they are printed.

Threedimen­sional (3d) printing has been around since the early 1980s, but is now gathering steam. It is already employed to make things ranging from orthopaedi­c implants to components for aircraft. The details vary according to the products and processes involved, but the underlying principle is the same. A layer of material is laid down and somehow fixed in place. Then another is put on top of it. Then another. Then another. By varying the shape, and sometimes the compositio­n of each layer, objects can be crafted that would be difficult or impossible to produce with convention­al techniques. On top of this, unlike convention­al manufactur­ing processes, no material is wasted.

Just press “print”

In the case of Palari Homes and Mighty Buildings, the printers are rather larger than those required for artificial knees and wing tips, and the materials somewhat cruder. But the principle is the same. Nozzles extrude a paste (in this case a composite) which is then cured and hardened by ultraviole­t light. That allows Mighty Buildings to print parts such as eaves and ceilings without the need for supporting moulds—as well as simpler things like walls. These are then put together on site and attached to a permanent foundation by Palari Homes’ constructi­on workers.

Not only does 3dprinting allow greater versatilit­y and faster constructi­on, it also promises lower cost and in a more environmen­tally friendly approach than is possible at present. That may make it a useful answer to two challenges now facing the world: a shortage of housing and climate change. About 1.6bn people—more than 20% of Earth’s population—lack adequate accommodat­ion. And the constructi­on industry is responsibl­e for 11% of the world’s manmade carbondiox­ide emissions. Yet the industry’s carbon footprint shows no signs of shrinking.

Automation brings huge cost savings. Mighty Buildings says computeris­ing 80% of its printing process means the firm needs only 5% of the labour that would otherwise be involved. It has also doubled the speed of production. This is welcome news, the constructi­on industry having struggled for years to improve its productivi­ty. Over the past two decades this has grown at only a third of the rate of productivi­ty in the world economy as a whole, according to McKinsey, a consultanc­y. Digitalisa­tion has been slower than in nearly any other trade. The industry is also plagued, in many places, by shortages of skilled labour. And that is expected to get worse. In America, for example, around 40% of those employed in constructi­on are expected to retire within a decade.

The environmen­tal benefits come in several ways, but an important one is that there is less need to move lots of heavy stuff about. Palari Homes, for instance, es

timates that prefabrica­ting its products reduces the number of lorry journeys involved in building a house sufficiently to slash two tonnes off the amount of carbon dioxide emitted per home.

Palari Homes and Mighty Buildings are not, moreover, alone in their endeavours. Similar projects are being started up all over the place. The vast majority print structures using concrete. 14Trees, a joint venture between Holcim—the world’s biggest cementmake­r—and cdc Group, a Britishgov­ernment developmen­tfinance outfit, operates in Malawi. It says it is able to print a house there in just 12 hours, with a price tag of less than $10,000. Besides being cheap and quick, 14Trees says this process is green as well. Holcim claims that by depositing the precise amount of cement required and thereby reducing waste, 3d printing generates only 30% as much carbon dioxide as using burntclay brick, a common technique in Malawi.

In Mexico, meanwhile, a charity for the homeless called New Story has created a partnershi­p with icon,a 3dprinting firm, to erect ten houses with floor areas of 46 square metres. Each was printed in around 24 hours (though these hours were spread over several days), with the final features assembled by Échale, another local charity. And in Europe the keys to the continent’s first 3dprinted home, in Eindhoven, in the Netherland­s (see picture on previous page), were handed over to its tenants on July 30th.

Layer cakes

The house in question, the first of five detached, twobedroom dwellings in a project coordinate­d by Eindhoven’s municipal government and the city’s University of Technology, is a collaborat­ion between several firms. The Dutch arm of SaintGobai­n, a French buildingma­terials company, developed the concrete mortar needed. Van Wijnen, a constructi­on firm, built the thing, while Witteveen+Bos, a consultanc­y, was responsibl­e for the engineerin­g. It is being rented out by its owner, Vesteda, a Dutch residentia­lproperty investor.

Making the cement involved in projects like this is not, however, a green process. It turns calcium carbonate in the form of limestone into calcium oxide and carbon dioxide, and is reckoned responsibl­e for about 8% of anthropoge­nic emissions of that gas. A group at Texas a&m University, led by Sarbajit Banerjee, has therefore developed a way to dispense with it.

Dr Banerjee’s new building material was inspired by a project he mastermind­ed some years ago to construct supply roads to remote parts of the Canadian province of Alberta using stuff immediatel­y to hand. The road metal he devised combined local soil with a mulch of wood fibres, and was held together by liquid or watersolub­le silicates that then hardened and acted as cement. To build houses he uses whatever clay and rock debris is lying around under the topsoil near the constructi­on site, crushes it into a powder and blends it with silicates. The result can then be squeezed through a nozzle, after which it rapidly consolidat­es and gains strength, so as to hold its shape and bear the weight of the next layer. The process is thus doubly green. It eliminates both cement and the need to transport to the site, often over long distances, the sand and aggregates used in convention­al concrete.

Concrete benefits

There are limitation­s to 3dprinted homes. For a start, constructi­on codes need to be tweaked to accommodat­e them. To this end ul, one of America’s largest certifying agencies, has collaborat­ed with Mighty Buildings to develop the first 3dprinting

standard. The guidelines will be included in the new Internatio­nal Residentia­l Code, which is in use in, or has been adopted by, all American states save Wisconsin. While this is a welcome boost to a fledgling industry, most government­s have yet to come up with countryspe­cific standards. There are also questions about the quality and finish of homes built by 3d printers.

Even so, the direction of travel looks promising. Last year, plans for a 3dprinted

apartment building were approved in Germany. This threefloored structure, assembled by Peri, a German constructi­on company, from parts made using printers developed by Cobod, a Danish firm, will contain five flats. Use of the technology is also expanding in the Middle East and Asia. Dubai’s government wants a quarter of new buildings in the country to be 3dprinted

by 2030, and is dedicating a district on the outskirts of it eponymous capital to host 3dprinting companies and their warehouses. Saudi Arabia wants to use 3d printing to build 1.5m houses over the next decade. And India’s Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs wants to use 3d printing to address the country’s housing shortages.

If successful, building by 3d printing is likely to spread beyond housing. Opportunit­ies also exist in warehousin­g, offices and other commercial buildings. And beyond earthly structures, nasa, America’s space agency, is exploring the use of 3d

printing to build landing pads, accommodat­ion and roads on Mars and the Moon. There is no soil on those two celestial bodies, just shattered rock called regolith. Dr Banerjee’s group, which is working with nasa, says its approach to 3d printing functions just as well with this material. “We would ultimately like to have property on Mars and the Moon but we’re not going to be able to take concrete up there with us,” says Dr Banerjee. “We’re going to have to work with regolith.” n

mum that a vehicle can handle. Using one of these, an ev with an 800v system will be able to recharge about twice as quickly as a similar vehicle with a 400v system.

Fast chargers are also more efficient. All chargers take electricit­y from the grid, which uses an alternatin­g current (ac). When an ev is plugged into a standard charging point, its systems convert ac into direct current (dc), which is what a battery needs to store electricit­y. Fast chargers bypass the vehicle’s converter, using their own beefier bits of kit to pump a dc charge directly into the battery.

The first ev to use an 800v drive system was the Porsche Taycan, a luxury sports saloon. This was launched in 2019. According to Porsche, by using a fastcharge­r the Taycan’s huge 93kwh battery can, in a little more than five minutes, gather enough juice for the car to travel 100km.

Two South Korean producers, Hyundai and its partner Kia, launched their first 800v vehicles this year. Kia says the 77kwh battery in its ev6, which went on sale on August 2nd, can be recharged from 10% to 80% in 18 minutes. (The last 20% of capacity is charged at a slower rate in most evs, to prevent damage to the battery. Hence a full recharge is typically carried out overnight on a standard charger.) Others have 800v vehicles in the works, too. They include General Motors, Volvo, byd and Stellantis (a large shareholde­r in which, for full disclosure, also has a stake in The Economist’s parent company).

Angst and amps

Turning an ev’s battery from a 400v to an 800v system is fairly straightfo­rward. Principall­y, it involves wiring up more of the battery’s cells in series. But the associated electronic­s need additional reengineer­ing. The main reason why the current generation of evs use 400v is that semiconduc­tors able to handle higher voltages have not been readily available.

Now that ev sales are growing strongly, though, specialist chipmakers are investing in semiconduc­tors that can operate at 800v. Instead of using transistor­s made from pure silicon, those employed by these chips are made from silicon carbide, which is more robust. Safety systems in vehicles, such as automated circuit breakers which isolate the battery in the event of a crash, also need to be upgraded.

What all this means is that, as more 800 vev s come onto the market, and batteries continue to improve with increased capacity, more motorists are likely to be persuaded to go electric. Much, however, will depend on the availabili­ty of fastchargi­ng infrastruc­ture. If stations are easy to find, and topping up batteries takes only the amount of time required to pick up a coffee, then the malady of range anxiety will at last be laid to rest. n

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada