The Economist (North America)

Alabama’s execution method

-

Nitrogen hypoxia per se is not an inherently painful or stressful experience (The Economist explains, January 27th). In fact what makes pure nitrogen so dangerous is that a leak which displaces enough breathable air can cause death with virtually no perceptibl­e symptoms as the victims lapse into unconsciou­sness. For this reason, facilities using gases like nitrogen or helium are required to install alarms that warn of dangerousl­y low oxygen levels in the event of a leak.

The problem with Alabama’s execution method is that the active participat­ion of the prisoner, in the form of volitional breathing, is required to administer the lethal agent. This is worse than ordering the condemned prisoner to push a button that will initiate his own death. It is more akin to the plight of a drowning person, who will hold his breath knowing a rapid death will ensue when he can no longer do so.

The intense and primal drive to breathe, which makes suicidal hypoxia by breathhold­ing physiologi­cally impossible, is presumably one of the reasons why waterboard­ing was considered by the CIA to be such a compelling threat during sessions of “enhanced interrogat­ion”.

Notwithsta­nding the near universal condemnati­on of capital punishment in democracie­s, the experience of a prisoner during the initial minutes of this procedure can be expected to resemble that of being waterboard­ed, or forced to maintain a painful stress position under threat of death.

RICK HOGE

Associate professor in neurology and neurosurge­ry

McGill University

Montreal

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada