Fa­ther-in-law passes the buck

The Expositor (Brantford) - - LIFE - AMY DICK­IN­SON Email: [email protected]­bune.com Twit­ter: @ask­ingamy

Dear Amy: Over the hol­i­days my wife and two young chil­dren were with my wife’s fam­ily (her mom, dad, sis­ter, broth­erin-law and their two chil­dren).

My sis­ter-in-law in­sisted that we or­der take-out in­stead of hav­ing a home­cooked meal. We or­dered in, and she paid for the meal.

Days later my fa­ther-in-law sug­gested that he and I should give her money for the meal ($47 each). I’m an­noyed by this for a few rea­sons: I have pur­chased sev­eral more ex­pen­sive take-out meals at fam­ily events and have never asked for (or been of­fered) com­pen­sa­tion.

This is also an ex­am­ple of an in­creas­ingly fre­quent sit­u­a­tion where my fa­ther-in-law ef­fec­tively dic­tates how my wife and I spend our money. For my son’s birth­day, he of­fered to cover half of the cost of mu­sic les­sons. It was a lovely idea but it also sad­dled us with an ad­di­tional ex­pense (I ended up pay­ing for all of the les­sons).

In my view, if he felt my sis­terin-law needed to be re­paid, he could have made the point at the time of the meal, or he could have cho­sen to take care of it him­self.

This is also an ex­ten­sion of a per­ceived dif­fer­ence in eco­nomic po­si­tion be­tween my wife and I, and her sis­ter’s fam­ily. As a re­sult, they tend to be treated more gen­er­ously by my in-laws. It is fine for them to treat their chil­dren how­ever they wish, but I don’t be­lieve that also con­scripts me to fol­low suit.

Am I just be­ing petty and cheap? — SON-IN-LAW Dear Son-in-law: Your fa­therin-law’s sug­ges­tions may sound like com­mand­ments to you, and you may feel pres­sured be­cause he is your fa­ther-in-law, but you are an adult and you can make a choice to get on board — or re­spond re­spect­fully: “Thanks for the sug­ges­tion. This is gen­er­ous of you. But I’ve picked up the check any num­ber of times; my the­ory is that these things even out in the end.”

You say that this has be­come a per­sis­tent is­sue; be­cause it seems you can ac­tu­ally af­ford to be more gen­er­ous, you should choose the path that causes you to feel the best about your­self. You can try to an­tic­i­pate, par­tic­i­pate and learn to tol­er­ate this ex­pec­ta­tion — and come off as mag­nan­i­mous and gen­er­ous — or you can po­litely push back and tol­er­ate the uncer­tainty that ac­com­pa­nies won­der­ing if you are be­ing stingy. Be­ing righ­teously cor­rect (as I sin­cerely be­lieve you are) doesn’t al­ways com­pen­sate for feel­ing petty.

Dear Amy: I re­cently ran into an old friend. We’ve known each other since child­hood, and dur­ing our years of friend­ship, our level of close­ness fluc­tu­ates.

Over the past 10 years we fell out of touch, due to fam­ily com­pli­ca­tions, a re­turn to school and a divorce (on my part), and work (on her part).

I was happy to see her re­cently and she seemed happy to see me. Be­cause we were both in a rush, I asked if she was on Face­book and she said yes.

I promised to con­tact her that way.

When I went to her Face­book page, I no­ticed her “add friend” but­ton was grayed out.

I “waved” at her through messenger, which is all I can do with­out a re­sponse from her.

I have heard noth­ing back, and she has not at­tempted to con­tact me.

I’m not sure if I’m be­ing snubbed, and don’t know what to do next. — IN THE GRAY Dear In the Gray: Your friend’s “add friend” but­ton might be in­ac­tive be­cause of her own pri­vacy set­tings. She might not re­al­ize that you are try­ing to add her as a friend. She might not re­al­ize that you are out there in the cy­ber fog, wav­ing wildly.

Give this one more try. Send her a card or an email (if pos­si­ble). Say, “It was so great to run into you again! Here’s my con­tact in­for­ma­tion in case you want to re­con­nect.” And then leave the con­nect­ing up to her.

Dear Amy: We have just sur­vived an­other hol­i­day sea­son with our lit­tle night­mare of a nephew, “Boo.” Boo and his folks live in an­other part of the coun­try and we all travel to spend a week at our an­ces­tral home over the hol­i­days.

Boo is six. His par­ents are won­der­ful peo­ple. Boo’s dad trav­els ex­ten­sively for work and his mom has de­cided to “home school” him. I’m not sure what this home school­ing con­sists of, be­cause al­though he is very bright and spir­ited, Boo doesn’t know how to play with other chil­dren, can’t share, take turns, sit still for meals or do a puz­zle.

My wife and I (and other fam­ily mem­bers) are all pretty sea­soned par­ents. We love this kid to bits, but we also dread see­ing him. We do see some mar­ginal im­prove­ment be­tween vis­its, but strug­gle bit­ing our tongue when this lit­tle dude is run­ning roughshod over other chil­dren (and adults) in the fam­ily. Any sug­ges­tions? — UN­CLE Dear Un­cle: The way you de­scribe “Boo’s” be­hav­ior, his chal­lenges are all re­lated to be­hav­ing in a “pro-so­cial” way. Yes, kinder­garten would def­i­nitely help. But his par­ents are tak­ing the tougher path.

When you see this lit­tle dude, force your­self to in­vite him on a kid-friendly out­ing (hope­fully with­out his folks). Choose an ac­tiv­ity that does NOT in­clude bright lights, loud mu­sic, or too much ad­ja­cent ac­tion. Take him on a short hike, go sled­ding or to a child-friendly gym. Cor­rect him if he is ag­gres­sive, re­di­rect him and demon­strate calm and con­sis­tent adult be­hav­ior.

Make a point of re­lat­ing: “Boo did re­ally well at first, but then he pushed his cousin. Our kids went through this stage ... do you want some sug­ges­tions?”

Even dur­ing brief vis­its, you could end up in­flu­enc­ing both “Boo” and his par­ents.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada

© PressReader. All rights reserved.