The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Mary Poppins with a camera

Vivian Maier was a master of street photograph­y

-

Yawning gaps in the life story of enigmatic Chicago nanny Vivian Maier, whose gritty street photograph­y became a sensation and the subject of an Oscar-nominated documentar­y only after she died, led to early depictions of her as a camerawiel­ding Mary Poppins who may not have fully grasped nor cultivated her raw talent.

But new research reveals the French-speaking Maier as obsessive about honing her craft starting in 1950. Within years, the self-taught Maier had so mastered photograph­y she often took just one shot to capture streetscap­e images heralded by critics more than five decades later.

Researcher Ann Marks showed her findings exclusivel­y to The Associated Press in advance of the release of her book “Vivian Maier Developed: The Real Story of the Photograph­er Nanny” this week. Marks drew on her access to 140,000 mostly unpublishe­d Maier photos as well as personal notes Maier kept and documents uncovered in public archives.

Maier’s Golden Era in the quality of her photograph­s ran from the mid-50s into the late 1960s in New York City, where she was born, and then Chicago. Her some 15-year burst of creativity steadily waned beginning around 1970. She died penniless and living alone at 83 in 2009.

It’s a fluke her photograph­y was ever discovered.

A key player in the discovery was John Maloof, a writer and historian who went on to help direct 2014’s “Finding Vivian Maier.” He bought a box full of Maier’s negatives and undevelope­d film at auction from a storage locker repossesse­d in 2007 because Maier was delinquent on the payments. He only later recognized their significan­ce. He learned of Maier’s whereabout­s from her obituary. He now owns 90 per cent of her work.

Even to those who knew her when she was alive, Maier was often an enigma. She was drawn to children but seemed incapable of forging relationsh­ips with adults. Marks also calls her an early feminist who “believed she could outdo any man.”

Her demeanour could be striking. She wore floppy hats and sometimes men’s shoes. She walked in marching style, arms swinging. She rarely smiled and complained Americans smiled too much.

Marks’ findings offer a credible answer to one mystery: Why did Maier only ever develop and print a tiny percentage of her photos?

Part of the explanatio­n, Marks says, was a hoarding disorder that became so severe that a floor in her apartment buckled under the weight of her newspaper collection. The act of taking pictures - snapshots of time saved on rolls of undevelope­d film - satisfied her urge to collect, psychologi­sts told Marks.

Among Marks’ findings was that Maier disliked the happygo-lucky main character in the 1964 Walt Disney movie “Mary Poppins.” Maier jotted one terse note about the story of the English nanny and the children she cared for: “Out of date, child servant relationsh­ip.”

But Marks’ main insight is how Maier threw herself into photograph­y at age 25.

She devoted years to experiment­ing with lighting and angles. She delved into books on photograph­y. She took nanny work for parents with an interest in photograph­y or other creative arts, including members of popular lounge act The Mary Kaye Trio.

By the mid-1950s, Maier had solidified her technique.

She was always on the lookout for good subjects. When she spotted one, she moved quickly. One child recalled embarrassm­ent at how Maier was oblivious to the discomfort of her photograph­ic targets.

Maier was a risk-taker. She ventured into crime-ridden areas alone at night to take pictures of vagabonds and even corpses. She invaded the private space of strangers without qualms, even tracking Frank Sinatra, Cary Grant and other Hollywood stars like a modernday paparazzi.

One of her most acclaimed photos - among thousands she never developed - was taken in 1957. It is of a young woman in a white dress who seems to float ghost-like toward a car at night. Examining the negatives, Marks could see Maier got it in one take.

One of her hallmarks was the use of a boxy, square-format Rolleiflex camera. Users hold it at waist level and look down into a viewfinder. That enabled Maier to move in, head down, and shoot before subjects knew what was happening. Marks writes that Maier’s camera choice made it “easier to operate as an outsider looking in.”

Marks also uncovered new evidence of a painful childhood.

Maier’s dad was an alcoholic; her mother, cold and distant. Before Vivian’s birth in 1926, her brother, Carl, was placed in a children’s home at the age of 5. He later said his parents “obviously didn’t want me.” He and Vivian were never close. He died childless at 57.

That Maier died with no close surviving heirs led to a legal tussle over copyrights to her increasing­ly sought-after photograph­s. A judge last year approved a copyright agreement between Maloof and Cook County, which represents Maier’s estate.

Maier’s childhood, which included years in France, haunted her into adulthood, and influenced her photograph­y. She showed an affinity for vulnerable children as subjects. Dolls also featured prominentl­y, harkening to her time in the 1940s sewing at New York’s Madame Alexander Doll Factory.

Maier had an aversion to any physical contact with adults. She once slugged a man who grabbed her when she stumbled. He suffered a concussion and sued. Maier also sometimes hit kids in her care as discipline, at least once prompting parents to fire her.

Her emotional distance makes her knack for conveying emotion through her photograph­y all the more remarkable.

But in the 1970s, her pictures lost their sense of intimacy. She began to stand back while taking them. She started photograph­ing inanimate objects, frequently newspapers.

The beginning of her creative decline coincided with the end of her happiest period, from 1956 to 1967, when she cared for three brothers in suburban Chicago’s Highland Park. The Gensburgs embraced her quirkiness, and she reveled in affection never received from her own family.

After she stopped working in the 1990s, she stopped taking photograph­s altogether. Online:

“Vivian Maier Developed: The Real Story of the Photograph­er Nanny,” http://amzn. to/2xFhIPT

 ?? (VIVIAN MAIER/ESTATE OF VIVIAN MAIER VIA AP) ?? This circa 1950 photo provided by the Estate of Vivian Maier shows one of the first photograph­s Maier took as she began to teach herself photograph­y while visiting France. New research about Maier shows the enigmatic Chicago nanny was obsessive about...
(VIVIAN MAIER/ESTATE OF VIVIAN MAIER VIA AP) This circa 1950 photo provided by the Estate of Vivian Maier shows one of the first photograph­s Maier took as she began to teach herself photograph­y while visiting France. New research about Maier shows the enigmatic Chicago nanny was obsessive about...
 ?? (VIVIAN MAIER/ESTATE OF VIVIAN MAIER AND JOHN MALOOF COLLECTION VIA AP) ?? This 1960s photo provided by the Estate of Vivian Maier and John Maloof Collection shows nuns on New York’s Fifth Avenue.
(VIVIAN MAIER/ESTATE OF VIVIAN MAIER AND JOHN MALOOF COLLECTION VIA AP) This 1960s photo provided by the Estate of Vivian Maier and John Maloof Collection shows nuns on New York’s Fifth Avenue.
 ?? (VIVIAN MAIER/ESTATE OF VIVIAN MAIER AND JOHN MALOOF COLLECTION VIA AP) ?? This 1956 photo provided by the Estate of Vivian Maier and John Maloof Collection shows a self-portrait of Maier in a series of mirrors at an unknown location.
(VIVIAN MAIER/ESTATE OF VIVIAN MAIER AND JOHN MALOOF COLLECTION VIA AP) This 1956 photo provided by the Estate of Vivian Maier and John Maloof Collection shows a self-portrait of Maier in a series of mirrors at an unknown location.
 ?? (VIVIAN MAIER/ESTATE OF VIVIAN MAIER AND JOHN MALOOF COLLECTION VIA AP) ?? This 1961 photo provided by the Estate of Vivian Maier and John Maloof Collection shows sailors standing in Chicago’s Union Station.
(VIVIAN MAIER/ESTATE OF VIVIAN MAIER AND JOHN MALOOF COLLECTION VIA AP) This 1961 photo provided by the Estate of Vivian Maier and John Maloof Collection shows sailors standing in Chicago’s Union Station.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada