The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Providing benefits not burdens

Why is the CRA denying the Disability Tax Credit to those who need it most?

- BY JENNIFER ZWICKER AND STEPHANIE DUNN Dr. Jennifer Zwicker is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Kinesiolog­y at the University of Calgary; Stephanie Dunn is a Research Associate at The School of Public Policy at the University of Calgary

“Providing benefits not burdens” is how former Health Minister Judy LaMarsh once described the vision for disability policy in Canada.

Unfortunat­ely, this vision is not a reality when it comes to one of the main benefits open to Canadians with disability: the federal Disability Tax Credit (DTC). Administer­ed by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA), the DTC is designed to recognize some of the higher costs faced by people with severe disabiliti­es and their caregivers.

Yet reports from Autism Canada and disability groups across the country suggest recent CRA decisions have resulted in people diagnosed with autism and intellectu­al disability having their eligibilit­y to the DTC suddenly revoked or denied — against the CRA’s own rules.

This is unsettling news for families caring for children with disability, given three in four children with disability identify as having a cognitive or mental health-related disability. This issue goes beyond the credit itself, given that DTC eligibilit­y is frequently used for access to additional federal and provincial disability benefits.

Revoking DTC eligibilit­y means a family with a child with a severe disability can no longer receive up to $2730 through the Child Disability Benefit and $4000 or more in federal and provincial disability-related tax credits (depending on income and where they live).

They also must close their child’s Registered Disability Savings Plans (RDSP), forfeiting contributi­ons from the government of up to $70,000 over the lifetime of the plan.

We commend the recent announceme­nt by Minister Lebouthill­ier that a Disability Advisory Committee will be reinstated next year. The committee’s mandate of advising on the CRA’s administra­tion and interpreta­tion of laws and programs relating to disability tax measures is sorely needed, as are efforts to improve awareness of the DTC and related benefits.

However, the committee has its work cut out for it. Recent concerns about people having their DTC eligibilit­y revoked are only the tip of the iceberg.

Research tells us the DTC is already underutili­zed, meaning most Canadians with qualifying disabiliti­es are not accessing the described benefits and credits. Of those who do claim the credit on their tax returns in any given year, only half of all claimants (including caregivers) actually receive value from the DTC.

In addition to awareness, three major barriers to accessing the DTC need to be addressed.

Firstly, the DTC is a nonrefunda­ble tax credit, which means that the credit itself is only valuable to those earning enough taxable income. This means it would be of little or no direct benefit to the one in five families in Canada with a child with a severe disability living in low income.

Secondly, eligibilit­y criteria are poorly operationa­lized. Criteria have been criticized for lacking clarity, being open to interpreta­tion, failing to accurately reflect the practicali­ties of living with a disability and requiring people with impairment­s in mental functions to meet a higher bar than for those with physical impairment­s.

Finally, the applicatio­n process is burdensome. The CRA’s public consultati­ons in 2014 demonstrat­ed that the applicatio­n process was not userfriend­ly, resulting in a shorter form. However, access to help and informatio­n from the CRA has been reduced in recent years. The absence of a clear and transparen­t appeals process is also a problem.

Consequent­ly, some seek paid profession­al support to access the tax credit, including people with limited resources to spare. Third-party companies to help people apply for the DTC, many with hefty fees, are commonly used, necessitat­ing laws to limit the amount they could charge applicants (something else that’s been on the government “to do” list for years).

The good news is that these are problems an empowered and transparen­t DAC can advise on. But this is a lot to take on for a committee of 12 voluntary unpaid members meeting three times a year.

The CRA is the gatekeeper to several key federal disability benefits underutili­zed by eligible Canadians. There are issues that the CRA can — and should — address immediatel­y, such as amending eligibilit­y criteria to better align with the Income Tax Act.

It is time the federal government started taking this seriously.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada