The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Time to rethink federal transfers system

- BY DAVID MACKINNON GUEST OPINION David MacKinnon is a senior fellow with the Frontier Centre for Public Policy and the Atlantic Institute for Market Studies.

It is time for a fundamenta­l course change by Atlantic Canadians with respect to equalizati­on and other regional subsidies. I recently made a presentati­on to independen­t senators in Ottawa on this subject in which I said that Canada’s regional subsidies were ineffectiv­e.

We’ve had a half-century of remarkably large subsidies to Quebec and Atlantic Canada, recently amounting to several thousand dollars per citizen per year in each of the Atlantic Provinces. Yet Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island are still at the bottom of a list of Canadian provinces and internatio­nal peers measured by economic output per person.

Quebec and Manitoba were only slightly better. Meanwhile, Newfoundla­nd and Labrador faces a grave financial crisis.

At the same meeting of the Senate, the Mowat Centre for Policy Innovation, a research institute associated with the University of Toronto, described the unfairness of this system, particular­ly in relation to Ontario.

The Mowat presentati­on showed that over the 10 years from 2007 to 2016, the net financial benefit from the federation for Atlantic Canada was $120 billion.

Ontario contribute­d $96 billion over this period, even though its manufactur­ing sector was encounteri­ng serious difficulti­es, including shrinking employment.

Many Ontario organizati­ons have expressed concern over the years about the scale of these problems, including the Ontario government, the Drummond Commission on Reform of Ontario’s Public Services, the Ontario Chamber of Commerce and others.

There’s also substantia­l concern about the impact on Albertans of their disproport­ionate net contributi­on to transfers.

This was a remarkable $228.6 billion between 2007 and 2016.

With rare exceptions, such as former New Brunswick premier Frank McKenna, there has been limited response to these concerns from political leaders in this part of the country.

When Atlantic leaders do defend the status quo, they usually appeal to historical events in the 19th century, such as Sir John A. Macdonald’s national policy, to justify current arrangemen­ts where Alberta and Ontario pay big for Atlantic Canada’s publicsect­or largesse.

What has been lacking in all these responses is any recognitio­n that the transfer system is unsustaina­ble - or that the subsidies should never be in place forever.

Most importantl­y, provincial programmin­g is less accessible in Ontario and in some cases Alberta than in equalizati­on-receiving provinces, something Atlantic Canada’s leaders have also failed to recognize.

So, major changes are needed. What should they be?

The first change should be to recognize excessive provincial government­s are the real barrier to growth in Atlantic Canada. They drive up taxes, lead to excessive infrastruc­ture, crowd out the private sector and produce government-driven economies that are out of phase with a marketdriv­en world.

Hospitals are a good indication of excessive infrastruc­ture that drives up costs and leads to high taxes that negatively impact growth. Nova Scotia has a hospital for every 22,000 citizens compared with Ontario, which has a hospital site for every 57,000 citizens.

The patterns in Newfoundla­nd and Labrador and P.E.I. are similar. New Brunswick has a hospital for every 30,000 people.

Similar excesses are evident throughout the public sector in Atlantic Canada. Government employment in Newfoundla­nd and Labrador as a portion of the provincial labour force is 40 per cent higher than the national average.

The second change should be to recognize that federal subsidies, including equalizati­on and many other arrangemen­ts, have failed to improve the fortunes of Atlantic Canada. They’re ineffectiv­e.

The third change is to recognize there are solutions for these grave problems that have been developed by many organizati­ons. They’re not easy solutions. The presentati­ons to the senators described some of them, including a reformed equalizati­on program that funds public sector restructur­ing, pilot projects on guaranteed income, improved methods of calculatin­g equalizati­on payments to provinces and several others.

Above all, we need regional leaders who are informed, brave and willing to take risks. The future of Atlantic Canada ultimately depends on whether good leaders emerge who can take the region on a better but different path.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada