The Guardian (Charlottetown)

Airports need more federal government help

- MONETTE PASHER DANIEL-ROBERT GOOCH newsroom @theguardia­n.pe.ca @PEIGuardia­n Monette Pasher is executive director of the Atlantic Canada Airports Associatio­n and DanielRobe­rt Gooch is president of the Canadian Airports Council.

The lockdown we are experienci­ng due to COVID-19 has been devastatin­g in Atlantic Canada — both for our people, especially those who have lost jobs or loved ones, — and for our business community. Our economy — and in particular, the tourism industry — has been decimated first by the pandemic, then by government-imposed travel restrictio­ns, which led to the permanent cancellati­on of 14 routes by Air Canada.

Without swift government action to support our airports and air routes, the damage may well be irreparabl­e. A robust air transporta­tion network is vital in Atlantic Canada. Two of our provinces are islands, and our region is more than a 10-hour drive from the next major Canadian city. Our provinces need dependable, timely, competitiv­e flight connection­s for businesses to prosper. If those connection­s weaken, Atlantic Canada becomes a less attractive place in which to live, work, visit, invest, and do business.

The cost to our airports, residents and communitie­s is already staggering. Atlantic airports anticipate losing nearly $140 million in revenue with a drop in 5.5 million passengers this year alone. And, we don’t expect the sector to recover for three or four years at a minimum.

The United States government understand­s the risk airports and communitie­s are facing. Months ago, it gave its airports $10 billion in direct support that can be used for capital expenditur­es, operating expenses including payroll and utilities, and debt payments. Neighbouri­ng Maine airports, including Bangor and Portland, received $4 million and $12 million respective­ly.

This is in stark contrast to Canada, where other than rent relief for our 22 largest airports, the Government of Canada has not provided direct assistance to the aviation sector.

In some ways, we are the victims of our own success. What we are seeing are the seams bursting on a user pay model for passenger air travel that has served Canada fairly well for the past 28 years.

It began by getting government and the taxpayer out of running, and funding, aviation — selling off Air Canada completely and transferri­ng the operation, developmen­t and maintenanc­e for most Canadian airports off to private community-based airport authoritie­s that operate on a not-for-profit basis.

Contrary to popular belief, our sector has largely operated without subsidies since privatizat­ion and even delivered a financial return to government. Since 1992, airport authoritie­s have paid over $6 billion to the federal government in the form of airport rent for leased land.

Meanwhile, Canada’s airlines and major airports have seen tremendous growth in passenger traffic — a 54-percent increase in the last 10 years. This growth has led to new routes and more competitiv­e options, making travel by air more accessible to more Canadians. This not-for-profit model has seen airports take on the risk of operating and maintainin­g airports so that their communitie­s can have access to quality, safe and accessible air transporta­tion service — service that is vital to local economies.

But there’s a downside to this model when it comes to the ongoing viability of smaller airports. Regional markets such as Atlantic Canada is where a strict adherence to user pay has begun to break down, even before COVID-19 struck. Aviation is by nature a very capital-intensive industry. In markets with low traffic volumes — fewer than one million passengers — it has always been a challenge to generate enough revenue to cover the cost of operations and ongoing infrastruc­ture maintenanc­e. Now with traffic volumes at only four per cent of normal levels for the region, it is not sustainabl­e without government support for our industry.

But that has not stopped airports from doing their job. Even as passenger numbers and revenues have tumbled, airports implemente­d enhanced safety and cleaning measures and continued to stay fully operationa­l to serve their travellers and communitie­s. At the same time, they have had no choice but to reduce costs in other areas, delaying or cancelling capital investment projects, laying off staff and reducing some services.

Virtually every airport in Canada, regardless of size or location, wants the same things from government. For larger rent paying airports, like Halifax Stanfield and St. John’s Internatio­nal Airport, they need current rent relief to continue until we return to pre-COVID-19 levels of travel. Smaller airports would greatly benefit from interest-free loans and grants, and access to federal infrastruc­ture programs. More funding through current programs such as the Airport Capital Assistance Program would assist smaller airports in ongoing safety-related capital infrastruc­ture maintenanc­e.

These actions would give airports some breathing room to maintain essential operations and continue to support Atlantic Canadians and regionally-based corporatio­ns with safe air access and essential services and begin to work towards an economic recovery.

 ?? CONTRIBUTE­D ?? Halifax Stanfield Internatio­nal Airport.
CONTRIBUTE­D Halifax Stanfield Internatio­nal Airport.
 ?? 123RF.COM PHOTO ??
123RF.COM PHOTO

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada