The Guardian (Charlottetown)

UNEQUAL ACCESS FOR CITIZENS, DEVELOPERS

-

The Dec. 21 Guardian's Jeers column did us great service by pointing out the massive shortcomin­gs residents face in the planning and developmen­t process. They are left entirely to their own devices when it comes to understand­ing the nuts and bolts of municipal bureaucrac­y. An engaged citizen must invest time, energy, dogged persistenc­e and patience to wade through reams of documents, attend/ watch council and committee meetings, decipher bylaws, review agendas and minutes. Meanwhile, developers have access to a variety of resources — an Official Plan, land use maps, zoning bylaws — not to mention an entire planning department to evaluate their proposals well in advance of any public notice. This paradox has resulted in citizen disilllusi­onment and apathy. Improving civic engagement must include reforms that make democracy more equitable. How? Through active public participat­ion. Public participat­ion is a partnershi­p between the public and its municipal administra­tion. True public participat­ion means ensuring citizens – individual­s and groups alike – are heard, respected, and their input has a genuine influence on decision-making and outcomes that might affect them. It’s time we demand that city councils give us the same advantages they grant developers and businesses. Municipali­ties must acknowledg­e the fundamenta­l rights of the public to influence the decisions that affect them and to participat­e in the developmen­t of their community. It’s time for Charlottet­own to lead the way and establish an official independen­t public consultati­on process.

Barbara Dylla, Charlottet­own

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada