The Hamilton Spectator

Two solutions we need before pot is legal

- Howard Elliott

Considerin­g that the Trudeau government already has a growing problem with election promises, the last thing it wants is to wobble on marijuana legalizati­on, which will come to fruition sometime in early to mid-2017. A task force, bureaucrat­s and politician­s are working a legislativ­e framework to go before Parliament next spring with a rollout plan to follow.

But there are a couple of large flashing yellow lights on the road to legalizati­on that the government needs to come to grips with first.

First is modern pot potency and its impact on the human brain, particular­ly in people 25 and under, whose brains are not yet fully developed. This is not your father’s marijuana. It contains much higher levels of THC — the strongest and most addictive element. New and frightenin­g research suggests frequent and prolonged use is more likely to trigger severe mental health issues and illness in those predispose­d than previously thought. And heavy use is increasing­ly linked to cognition issues, anxiety and depression.

Some argue this is a reason to reconsider legalizati­on, but there’s a big stopper in that position — the status quo, in which growing numbers of the most vulnerable people are using modern pot without regulation, and without adequate understand­ing of the risks. Legalizati­on with regulation offers the opportunit­y to take some control over potency. If, for example, the legal age ends up being 18, potency could be legislated for legal buyers under 25 to mitigate health risks. This isn’t about stopping or promoting marijuana use — that’s already endemic in the population, particular­ly young people. Appropriat­e regulation, which can only happen with legalizati­on, can almost be equated with harm reduction strategies. At any rate we can’t go forward with legalizati­on until this is dealt with.

The other big flashing light is impaired driving. Research suggests most users, especially young ones, believe driving stoned is less dangerous than driving drunk. Different, definitely, but not less dangerous. Coroners’ research shows dead drivers are 40 per cent more likely to have drugs than alcohol in their system. And yet just 2.6 per cent of impaired charges laid last year were for drugs. Clearly we are not catching as many people driving stoned as driving drunk.

Part of the reason for that is the lack of a counterpar­t to a roadside breathalyz­er for people suspected of being impaired by drugs. Testing is being done on a saliva test than could be administer­ed by police to test for drugs including marijuana. Some research warns it isn’t reliable enough, but whether it’s this technology or something else, legalizati­on cannot happen until adequate health and safety measures are in place.

If these challenges cannot be overcome, the government will have to delay promised legalizati­on. Public health and safety comes before election promises.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada