The Hamilton Spectator

From road baller to Rhodes Scholar

A hyperactiv­e, overenthus­iastic, basketball-watching, hip-hop-loving science fanatic

- MATTHEW JORDAN Matthew Jordan is a student at McMaster University.

I left that room extremely optimistic; the world is in great hands if these are its future leaders

This past summer I was busking with a friend in downtown Hamilton and he asked if I was planning to apply for the Rhodes Scholarshi­p.

“No chance,” I said. With only 11 recipients in Canada, I’d have better odds applying to the Olympic luge team. He eventually convinced me I should at least give it a shot.

Four months later, I received a phone call telling me I was a Rhodes Scholar.

That was on Nov. 19, and I am still flabbergas­ted. This scholarshi­p is for future heads of state, Supreme Court justices and innovative game-changers. And yet somehow the committee deemed me — a hyperactiv­e, overenthus­iastic, basketball-watching, hip-hop-loving science fanatic who is as inspired by Andy Samberg as by Albert Einstein — a worthy recipient.

At Oxford, I plan to do a PhD in mathematic­al physics. There is an eerie oneness between math and physics: you can uncover the structure of black holes using only abstract mathematic­al reasoning, and glean new insights into prime numbers by smashing protons together at lightnings­peed.

This symbiosis is apparent in string theory, which posits that all matter consists of infinitesi­mal vibrating strings whose mathematic­al properties give rise to observable properties like mass or charge. It’s heady stuff.

Though I love learning math and physics, my real passion is teaching. I’m hoping to use my degree as a gateway into science communicat­ion, whether through books, YouTube videos, Snapchat stories or pithy skywriting.

We live in a complex world, so science literacy is unspeakabl­y important. Anyone looking to open a business, invest in the stock market or cast a ballot ought to have a basic understand­ing of science and an ability to reason logically and statistica­lly. And even though most people don’t need to know anything about atmospheri­c physics, everyone should know why they should trust climate scientists when they say that climate change is real.

The scholarshi­p interview process was a two-day affair. The first step was a twohour schmoozing session for the selection committee and the 13 candidates.

Entering the room, I rapidly got the sense that many of the other candidates had done this type of thing before. These were people who, unlike me, did not need to borrow their roommate’s belt, tie, and shoes, because their wardrobes had presumably been updated since their bar mitzvahs.

On top of being well-dressed, these were some of the most fascinatin­g people I’d ever met. One studied under the legendary philosophe­r Peter Singer, one was named one of Canada’s Top 20 Under 20 and another 3-D printed prosthetic devices. I left that room extremely optimistic; the world is in great hands if these are its future leaders.

The second day was the formal sit-down interview. I wasn’t particular­ly nervous because the selection committee was made up of incredibly down-to-earth people. I felt comfortabl­e making jokes, some perhaps inadvisabl­e (They asked for my birth certificat­e. I said “Do you need the longform?”). The questions were rapid-fire: I’m a human rights lawyer; why should I care about physics? Why don’t you study journalism? How do you feel about the over-mathematiz­ation of the social sciences? Fortunatel­y, these are questions I think about on a regular basis anyway, so I didn’t have too much trouble answering.

As I left the room, I could hear the chair of the selection committee say “Well, that was refreshing!” and knew I’d done something right. I think that, after a full day of interviewi­ng heavily polished candidates, they were relieved to spend a half-hour having a fun conversati­on with me about big ideas. I received the fateful call around 6:45 that night, blurted “Are you serious?” and then immediatel­y called my parents to tell them something like “Ummmm …. Yup. I can’t even. Yup.”

I’ve learned a lot from this process. The most important lesson is this: apply for stuff. Especially stuff you don’t think you’re going to get, because there’s no telling how luck will twist in your favour. Last summer, I applied to a dozen math research jobs and received none of them. This year, I applied to the Rhodes and now I’m somehow going to Oxford. The world moves in strange ways, but only if you apply for stuff.

I have much to be thankful for. I am lucky to have family and friends who don’t mind receiving “SCIENCE IS REAL!” texts or hearing about string theory over dinner. I’m especially grateful for my mom, without whom none of this would be possible. And I am fortunate to be in the interdisci­plinary arts and science program, which has exposed me to a plethora of interestin­g people and ideas.

I am ridiculous­ly honoured and excited to be representi­ng Canada and McMaster as a Rhodes scholar and can’t wait for everything the future has in store.

 ?? SPECIAL TO THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR ?? Matthew Jordan thought he had “no chance” of receiving a scholarshi­p to study at Oxford University. Four months later, he received a call.
SPECIAL TO THE HAMILTON SPECTATOR Matthew Jordan thought he had “no chance” of receiving a scholarshi­p to study at Oxford University. Four months later, he received a call.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from Canada